Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 29122015 9896.jpg

File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 29122015 9896.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2016 at 06:23:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:07, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 08:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ A kind of japanese mood, I would say...--Jebulon (talk) 10:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support canceled, in favor of the other version. I don't want both pictures shoud be featured.--Jebulon (talk) 00:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, you are right, @Jebulon. Any time, I visit that wooden water slide tower, the same thoughts surround me. Kind of Zen ... eradiates lots of tranquility. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The "alternative" is even better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice view --Rjcastillo (talk) 12:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 20:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support moved to alternative -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Tranquil and poetic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ — Julian H.^✈ 14:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since the other one will be featured: Neutral. — Julian H.^✈ 10:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  Oppose Sorry, Johann, the subject and lighting are nice but the composition isn't quite working. A distant landscape like that is crying out for a wider aspect ratio and I think you've kept it tall because of the reflection. In this format it seems unbalanced. The distant hills on the right aren't contributing and it sort of sags in the middle (though the arrangement would work well in a magazine with writing on the right). The little stick at the bottom keeps catching my eye and should be cloned out. IMO, you've taken a much better picture, though I think it also can be improved with a 16:9 crop. I've uploaded that: File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 25122015 9840 169crop.jpg. You might not want an Alt at this stage, and the the other photo was taken on an different date, so perhaps some would complain. What do you think? -- Colin (talk) 20:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  Question Why don´t you nominate the suggested image as FP for Johann, Colin? Not as alternative, as a separate nomination. --Hubertl 20:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok lets run both nominations at the same time, to allow people decide which (or both) to support/oppose. See Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 25122015 9840 169crop.jpg.

@Uoaei1, Hubertl, Jebulon, Yann, and Iifar: -- Colin (talk) 20:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin Falbisoner, Medium69, Rjcastillo, Livioandronico2013, and Daniel Case: -- Colin (talk) 20:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Code, George Chernilevsky, Σπάρτακος, Cayambe, and Christian Ferrer: -- Colin (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek, Julian Herzog, and ArionEstar: -- Colin (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment - Thanks for the ping. Yes, the second picture is definitely more beautiful and harmonious than the first. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Comment By rules: "Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer." Other nomination has 17 support votes and no oppose -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment George Chernilevsky: In this case it´s different IMO, these two pictures are different, not just the motif, also different days. So there are two different photos, not two different versions of one picture. --Hubertl 14:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure, but i like both photos very much. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Those are two different images taken two different days, only the subject and the photographer are the sames. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]