Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Cecilia (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg

File:Santa Cecilia (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2016 at 17:18:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 18:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ralf Roleček 19:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support both versions are fine with me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I sorta prefer the original version but as was said above both versions look good. Reguyla (talk) 20:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 01:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version

Info I thought to explain the light matter (White balance, for example), however, I thought that showing the problem with an image would be easier --The Photographer (talk) 18:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good also. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ralf Roleček 19:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perhaps still better -- Spurzem (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 22:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - With the caveat that I wasn't there, this version looks better to me. Neither version is near perfect, as the lower right and left corners are fuzzy, but I'm willing to tolerate that in view of the quality of the resolution of the fresco. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC) - I can't support this alt version with the photographer stating that the colors are wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support both versions are fine with me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this one. w.carter-Talk 08:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zcebeci (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too yellow, too warm.--Jebulon (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like warm colors. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support On the whole this works better. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Reguyla (talk) 20:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 19:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support ----Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose wrong colors --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 16:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If color were an intrinsic property of an object, and it was only the perceived color that changed under different lighting conditions, you could match the object’s intrinsic color in printed output, say, under any lighting conditions, and the colors would then match under all conditions. However, because color is not an intrinsic property of the object but rather a sensation, the only thing you can match is the sensation that a particular color induces in your visual sensory system. That sensation will change under different lighting conditions, and it will usually change differently for different objects. So the best you can do is match colors under specific lighting conditions --The Photographer (talk) 02:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /J e e 03:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

The chosen alternative is: File:Santa Cecilia (Rome) - Ceiling alt.jpg