Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sarcophaga carnaria, Sète 05.jpg
File:Sarcophaga carnaria, Sète 05.jpg, featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2015 at 09:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera
- Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer 09:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer 09:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 11:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support--LivioAndronico (talk) 12:27, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Brilliant. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 13:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Nice capture. --Laitche (talk) 14:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- weak oppose Nice attempt, but not sure this ranks among our best (see File:Sarcophaga sp male.jpg). Background is too cluttered, I'm not a fan of front flash light, and the details are missing (and it's already quite small to begin with). - Benh (talk) 15:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- The example is too good, Christian is not Makro Freak :) --Laitche (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Mmm... not yet. --Laitche (talk) 17:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Better to set the bar high right ? ;) Yes I'm pretty sure one has to be very skilled to get this result. But getting a better background and lighting is possible. Stopping down to f/22.0 might have been too much. The supposed gain in DOF is cancelled by quality lost. - Benh (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I thought f/22 and busy background when I voted but I ventured to support. And yes, your thoughts and opinions are yours, no problem :) --Laitche (talk) 17:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Better to set the bar high right ? ;) Yes I'm pretty sure one has to be very skilled to get this result. But getting a better background and lighting is possible. Stopping down to f/22.0 might have been too much. The supposed gain in DOF is cancelled by quality lost. - Benh (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- The example is too good, Christian is not Makro Freak :) --Laitche (talk) 17:15, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Mmm... not yet. --Laitche (talk) 17:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Rainbow unicorn (talk) 19:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good, but the specimen noticed by Benh is better, therefore I think in this case that one FP in enough.--Jebulon (talk) 19:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 18:57, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 16:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Diptera