Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 14 2015
-
- Nomination Lymantriinae (caterpillar) --Vengolis 03:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Orsotriaena medus --Vengolis 03:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gea spinipes --Vengolis 03:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sweeties Donuts in Commerce, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 02:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture "Steinerner Fischer" at the Benediktinerplatz, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Renaissance portal of the town hall on Neuer Platz #1, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Overdoor at the former Society of Jesus College on Karfreitstrasse #14, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace on Neuer Platz #14, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade ornament at the building on Benediktinerplatz #3, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Das Kavalierhaus im Park vom Schloss Caputh. Das Kavalierhaus hat als Baudenkmal die Nummer 09190003. --Nightflyer 21:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 22:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Impression aus dem Schlossgarten Caputh in Brandenburg. Der Garten hat als Baudenkmal die Nummer 09190003. --Nightflyer 21:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 22:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vauban Embankment, Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 20:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Very nice late afternoon colors. --Hubertl 21:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine Bildstock in Trier, Germany (1673). --Palauenc05 18:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Yes.--Jebulon 22:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Seiser Alm in South Tyrol, with the mountains of Langkofel group in the background --Moroder 17:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination view to Reine and Gravdalsbukta with a rainbow by Ximonic --Olivier LPB 16:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose beautiful composition but the overexposition is too disturbing --Christian Ferrer 17:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway viaduct across the river Saale in Ziegenrück in Thuringia --Ermell 13:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination AC Cobra sportscar --Ermell 13:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Decline sorry but the crop... --Ralf Roletschek 18:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW 700 Coupé at Isetta Meeting in Bad Wörishofen, Alfred-Baumgarten-Street -- Spurzem 12:39, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Michael church, Linás de Broto, Huesca, Spain --Poco a poco 11:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very nice and very good quality--Lmbuga 11:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cantalloc subterranean aqueducts, Nazca, Peru --Poco a poco 11:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 12:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vauban Embankment, Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 11:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Die Schellenbeck entlang der Kleingartenanlage Schellenbeck in Wuppertal. By User:Ies --Atamari 10:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Decline It isn't sharp, sorry --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Karlstraße in Wuppertal. By User:Ies --Atamari 10:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Katholische Hauptschule an der Bundesallee in Wuppertal. By User:Ies --Atamari 10:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sigmaringen, Erker am Fidelishaus --Berthold Werner 10:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination In memory of Celestino "Ito" Formoso Vidal. Monte Louro, Louro, Muros, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 10:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination aerial view of Campeche, Yucatan, Mexico --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination aerial view of city Perote between Mexico D. F. and gulf coast --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination aerial view of Campeche, Yucatan, Mexico --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Airbus A320 XA-INJ of Interjet in Mexico City --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. A lot of dust in the background ... --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloß Caputh, Spiegelsaal --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sigmaringen, Statue am Fidelishaus --Berthold Werner 08:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mary Magdalene church in Wójtowice 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mary Magdalene church in Wójtowice 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mary Magdalene church in Wójtowice 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Starków --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination West wing of Biebrich Palace as seen from west. --Code 07:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Biebrich Palace as seen from south west. --Code 07:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East wing of Biebrich Palace as seen from west. --Code 07:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain D, Artist: Edmund Paul Andreas Hofmann von Aspernburg. This is one of four Triton- and Najad fountains at the Maria-Theresien-Square in Vienna. --Hubertl 07:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:43, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hofkapelle Kompatsch, Nauders, Tyrol --Hubertl 07:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:43, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South face St. Florian abbey, seen from garden of prelates --Isiwal 07:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gevorkian Theological Seminary 2. Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia. --Halavar 07:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wedding tent. Zvartnots, Armavir Province, Armenia. --Halavar 07:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eketorps borg (Gräsgård 45:1) a fort from the iron age on Öland --Jopparn 06:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Semporna, Sabah: TM Lahad Datu (Telekom Malaysia Lahad Datu Branch)) --Cccefalon 04:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)* Comment leaning out on the right side.. --Hubertl 05:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the hint, Hubertl --Cccefalon 15:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC) - Promotion very good now. --Hubertl 16:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Semporna, Sabah: TM Lahad Datu (Telekom Malaysia Lahad Datu Branch)) --Cccefalon 04:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)* Comment leaning out on the right side.. --Hubertl 05:55, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Langkawi, Malaysia: Langkawi Cable Car, Top Station on Gunung Machinchang --Cccefalon 04:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Langkawi, Malaysia: Langkawi Sky Bridge at Gunung Machinchang --Cccefalon 04:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandakan, Sabah: IOI Sandakan Biomass Power Plant --Cccefalon 04:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ceiling fresco of the Imperial Staircase at Altenburg Abbey (Lower Austria) --Uoaei1 04:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of Zwettl Abbey Church, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination North wing of the cloister at Zwettl Abbey, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Junonia lemonias --Vengolis 03:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lombard capital at the cloister of the Benedictine Abbey, Millstatt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque arcade with Lombard capital at the cloister of the Benedictine Abbey, Millstatt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen, Nordkirchen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The interior of The Arcade in Cleveland, Ohio (United States). --Michael Barera 01:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 07:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canna plant's ripe fruits at Rajbiraj, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 14:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. And congratulations to your start with a real DSLR cam. I guess, you can see the big difference to the unfortunate smartphone uploads. --Cccefalon 04:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks alot & yeah! this is true.--Tulsi Bhagat 13:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle Budatín, Slovakia --Pudelek 22:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teotihuacán, Mexico --Ralf Roletschek 15:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment At least three visible dustspots, maybe more. Please check (before nominating next time, if possible...--Jebulon 21:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 09:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Support Daddy says that crop at right is unfortunate, but the pic is good enough for QI.--Jebulon 21:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lima Cathedral, Peru --Poco a poco 18:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 19:03, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A view of the Trinity River from the GeO-Deck of Reunion Tower in Dallas, Texas (United States). --Michael Barera 03:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment IMO the image is tilted CW. --XRay 04:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Tilt corrected. Michael Barera 01:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Weak Support Better, but not the best sharpness and contrast.--XRay 09:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery, Tulcán, Ecuador --Poco a poco 22:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support There is a category for Topiaries.--Jebulon 23:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Masthuggskyrkan (church). --ArildV 09:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Tilted in ccw direction and it will need some perspective correction Poco a poco 20:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks.--ArildV 20:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
You didn't upload any new version Poco a poco 19:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC) Done and uploaded.--ArildV 07:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Masthuggskyrkan (church). --ArildV 09:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Sankt Botvids kyrka (church). --ArildV 20:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Not really convincig, can you at least crop out the bottom left car Poco a poco 21:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC) - Review Thank you for your review but I think the contrast between the church and the ordinary residential district is interesting (that is the point of the image). I dont want to remove more of the foreground and the left house. --ArildV 21:52, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination: Sankt Botvids kyrka (church). --ArildV 20:33, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Avaste bog. Kruusamägi 00:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK. --C messier 18:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Avaste bog. Kruusamägi 00:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose IMHO, too unsharp. --C messier 18:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Avaste bog. Kruusamägi 00:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose IMO, too shallow DOF, sky is blown. --C messier 18:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Allamanda cathartica at Rajbiraj, Saptari, Nepal --Tulsi Bhagat 05:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not really sharp (shallow DOF), jpeg artifacts. --C messier 18:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coast of Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 16:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manor in Stary Wielisław, outbuilding 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK for me, despite losing sharpness towards the left. --C messier 18:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fortress Ehrenbreitstein, Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany --XRay 03:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Perspective overcorrected, buildings lean out. --C messier 15:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Fixed Thanks. You're right. It's fixed now.--XRay 06:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --C messier 19:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Convent Hamicolt, Rorup, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 17:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Walls leaning out a bit. --C messier 15:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Fixed Thanks for your hint. It's fixed now.--XRay 06:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --C messier 19:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Avaste bog. Kruusamägi 00:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment I would cut the blurry bottom. --C messier 17:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC) Done I made a crop. Kruusamägi 22:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Support OK. --C messier 19:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:Schönbrunn_vase_NE_Gloriette.jpg edit
- Nomination Stone vase in the gardens of Schönbrunn, NE of Gloriette. --Herzi Pinki 08:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I disagree, the shadows are much too dark. Please check the monitor. Easy to fix! --Hubertl 08:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support QI for me, sorry, can´t see an advantage in brightning, IMO the vase looses it´s contour then --Isiwal (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral Some areas are drowned in darkness, but small enough to accept them. Technically not a superior image, but ok. However, I find the description of the image inappropriate. The lady seems to be the main motif of the compo, reducing the meaning of the vase to a sheer requisite. By that, it is more a photo for the family album. Perhaps it should be named "Tourists in Schönbrunn"? --Cccefalon 14:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment the lady is de minimis. The vase is protected (as all of Schönbrunn) and it is the main object in my composition, it is set in context, which by no doubt is a touristical context. The composition follows the Rule of Thirds, also with the alley on the left side. I nominated the image as we all have been asked to nominate more images for QI to improve the rate of QI images by Austrian photographers. It is not important for me, whether this images gets promoted or not. It may be a bad photo for a vase, but it is definitely not the image of a lady. Sorry to bother you. About the dark areas I will have a look, but I'm still waiting for some technical explanation by Hubertl. The histogram on my monitor is ok. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- You are not bothering, Herzi. I know, that we might have different opinions about the compo, but I am fair enough, not to cast an oppose vote because of this. As I said, it is technically ok. Thanks for contributing your images! It's always a pleasure to see them. --Cccefalon 17:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- What exactly needs more technical explanation as I wrote already? Here and on your Discu. I don´t have that time to explain something, which I know for sure, that you certainly know what it means. Please don´t play one of your typical, wellknown games: "I don´t understand what you´ve said." --Hubertl 18:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help and understanding
- What exactly needs more technical explanation as I wrote already? Here and on your Discu. I don´t have that time to explain something, which I know for sure, that you certainly know what it means. Please don´t play one of your typical, wellknown games: "I don´t understand what you´ve said." --Hubertl 18:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- You are not bothering, Herzi. I know, that we might have different opinions about the compo, but I am fair enough, not to cast an oppose vote because of this. As I said, it is technically ok. Thanks for contributing your images! It's always a pleasure to see them. --Cccefalon 17:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Hubertl 07:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
File:2015.07.07.-22-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg edit
- Nomination Bruch-Weide oder Knack-Weide - Salix fragilis --Hockei 16:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose Noise artefacts. --C T Johansson 16:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Revenge I think. --Hockei 16:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Revenge I think. --Hockei 16:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Well, there are some, but not really dominant. However, if he wanted to revenge, he better pointed out the chromatic aberrations and the partly problematic bright background. Fixable imo. --Cccefalon 16:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Done I reprocessed the image from scratch, courtesy of the RAW that Hockei sent me. Alle adressed issues - Johanssons as well as mine - should be met now. Please C T Johansson, review again. As editor, I won't cast a vote. --Cccefalon 19:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Maybe I'll rework it again later. Even though I find Cccefalon's version better than mine. --Hockei 05:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --Hubertl 06:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
File:2015.07.07.-21-Mulde Eilenburg--Bruch-Weide.jpg edit
- Nomination Bruch-Weide oder Knack-Weide - Salix fragilis --Hockei 16:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose Noise artefacts. --C T Johansson 16:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Revenge I think. --Hockei 16:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Maybe I'll rework it again later. --Hockei 05:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --Hubertl 06:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Pilze_Nähe_der_Hexenstühle_Kastelruth_3.jpg edit
- Nomination Amanita battarae mushroom in Kastelruth. --Moroder 22:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 14:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
OpposeSorry, but the subject is much too small for this large picture. Too much space with other ordinary vegetation around it. Visibly details are not enough for me. Not QI IMO. --Hockei 15:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)- The purpose is to show the mushroom in it's natural environment as you can read from the filename and the description. Nothing wrong with it!?. Why shouldn't that be QI?--Moroder 09:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry again. But I only can say what I think and feel when I view a picture. For me it's not more than a snapshot. I hope another opinion will appear here. --Hockei 16:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Don't be angry at me but I believe reviewers should think more and feel less, which means be more specific. Snapshot is not a good compliment ;-) cheers --Moroder 16:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral Not angry. After the felt twentieth time review I change my vote to neutral. I'm missing more pictures of this mushroom, especially one or two close ups or macros in various views in combination to this here. Your intention to show this mushroom with this standalone picture is not convincing. Therefore I used the expression "snapshot". I doubt the seriousness. It's just my opinion. Good or not good shall not be my problem anymore. --Hockei (talk) 11:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Don't be angry at me but I believe reviewers should think more and feel less, which means be more specific. Snapshot is not a good compliment ;-) cheers --Moroder 16:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry again. But I only can say what I think and feel when I view a picture. For me it's not more than a snapshot. I hope another opinion will appear here. --Hockei 16:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Nice picture. I find here very interesting information about the environment of this lonely mushroom. For instance, the fact it is alone is interesting by itself, IMO. Technicaly good.--Jebulon 19:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Hubertl 19:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)