Oppose Please read Commons:Valued_image_scope#Buildings: When appropriate, the building scope can be divided in a "XXX (exterior)" scope and a "XXX (interior)" scope, thus leading to two independent VI nominations for two independent scopes. [...] Additional scopes can exceptionally be proposed if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest (for instance a remarkable crypt or sanctuary).
There is already a VI-nomination for the interior of Kreuzeskirche. Can you please explain what on this Belfry is so special that it deserves an own scope? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 20:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support, useful and best in scope. The bells and their installation are of interest independently of the interior of the church itself. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support While I admire Capricorn4049 and holding VI's to a high standard and they are a reward, I feel this part of the building has notability in and of itself. I can see someone looking for a picture of the bells themselves. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
