User:Cephas/Archives 2023

Copyright status: File:Achillea millefolium 15-p.bot-achille.miro-4.jpg

Copyright status: File:Achillea millefolium 15-p.bot-achille.miro-4.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Achillea millefolium 15-p.bot-achille.miro-4.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Achillea millefolium 15-p.bot-achille.miro-1.jpg
• File:Achillea millefolium 15-p.bot-achille.miro-2.jpg
• File:Achillea millefolium 15-p.bot-achille.miro-3.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Base map for File:Oceanodroma markhami map.svg

Can you list what base map you used for File:Oceanodroma markhami map.svg on the file page? Thanks-- Therapyisgood (talk) 20:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Done. Cephas (talk) 23:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poecile atricapillus CT 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Picoides villosus f CT 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamiasciurus hudsonicus CT 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boucles d'oreilles 11-o.lau-F174.LA1001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boucles d'oreilles - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F175.LA975-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:58, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collier - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F081.LA899-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:58, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bracelet 11-o.lau-F180.LA1029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 17:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bandeau 11-o.lau-F258.LA983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bas-relief 11-o.lau-F122.LA953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buteo lineatus JRVdH 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buteo lineatus JRVdH 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accipiter cooperii JRVdH 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accipiter cooperii JRVdH 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 15:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Accipiter cooperii JRVdH 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice work --Mister rf 15:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canne de chef - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F217.LA874 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canne de chef - détails 11-o.lau-F217.LA874 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canne de chef - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F216.LA872 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celosia spicata 'Flamingo Feather' Zonotrichia leucophrys JRVdH 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 17:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corvus brachyrhynchos UL 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dryocopus pileatus UL 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 16:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dryocopus pileatus UL 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 16:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casse-tête - détails 11-o.lau-F129.LA861-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 13:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boucles d’oreilles 11-o.lau-F176.LA1079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 13:43, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâton de danse 11-o.lau-F052.LA942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 13:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâton de danse 11-o.lau-F050.LA1046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 13:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthis flammea UL 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthis flammea UL 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Mister rf 00:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthis flammea UL 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthis flammea Spinus tristis UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 13:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spinus tristis UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthis flammea UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthis flammea UL 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --痛 23:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casse-tête - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F129.LA861-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bracelet de bénitier 11-o.lau-F123.LA931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --痛 05:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erythronium americanum ULaval 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forest road UL 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice series. Do you have photos of this road in other seasons, too? -- Ikan Kekek 15:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forest road UL 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not as sharp as the other one and maybe with just a bit of blowing in the brightest highlights, but still good. -- Ikan Kekek 15:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maianthemum racemosum UL 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinacea purpurea Spinus tristis JRVdH 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinacea purpurea Spinus tristis JRVdH 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinacea purpurea Spinus tristis JRVdH 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Melospiza melodia JRVdH 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Melospiza melodia JRVdH 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâton de danse 11-o.lau-F019.LA1130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceinture - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F221.LA1009-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canne de chef - détails 11-o.lau-F216.LA872 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bandeau frontal - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F212.LA977-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DoF low, category for the location (museum) missing --XRay 09:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC) Comment It is part of the Lau of Malaita collection, which is a collection shared by Université Laval library museum collections and Collections of the Musée de la civilisation --Cephas 22:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC) Don't explain, add the category, please. --XRay 15:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)  Comment @XRay: I have checked the categories. The Cephas' comment is relevant as the category "Université Laval library museum collections" (the museum) includes the category "Lau of Malaita" (one of the collections in this museum). Our policy for categories recommends avoid adding both including and included categories to the same image. --LexKurochkin 07:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Ups. Sorry. So IMO (weak) support. --XRay 11:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota monax UL 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota monax UL 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota monax UL 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota monax UL 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinacea purpurea Spinus tristis JRVdH 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice work --Mister rf 13:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthis flammea Spinus tristis UL 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice work --Mister rf 10:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthis flammea Spinus tristis UL 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice work --Mister rf 10:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cartouchière - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F169.LA1140-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:40, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceinture de guerrier - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F135.LA935-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceinture de guerrier - détails 11-o.lau-F135.LA935-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coupe Vanier UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota monax UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 02:33, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melospiza melodia JRVdH 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota monax UL 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota monax UL 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Myiodynastes hemichrysus

Hello friend. This map has to be updated, see both IUCN and eBird. Two ssp formerly in Myiodynastes chrysocephalus now assigned here, but this latter map is OK. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 11:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

A very late Thanks!! Hector Bottai (talk) 12:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coiffe de plumes 11-o.lau-F238.LA943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 11:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melospiza melodia JRVdH 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota monax UL 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 11:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oenothera biennis Spinus tristis JRVdH 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 12:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oenothera biennis Spinus tristis JRVdH 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 12:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oenothera biennis Spinus tristis JRVdH 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 12:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persicaria polymorpha Zonotrichia leucophrys JRVdH 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 12:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinacea purpurea Spinus tristis JRVdH 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bunch of flower at the left bottom should be cropped, what is in flying in the middle of the image? I'd clone it out. --Poco a poco 17:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Galessandroni 11:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collier 11-o.lau-F079.LA1127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Contenant à chaux - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F071.LA911-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spizella passerina ULaval 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamias striatus UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamias striatus UL 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamias striatus UL 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 15:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamias striatus UL 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 15:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flèche - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F085.LA926-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flèche - détails 11-o.lau-F085.LA926-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flûte 11-o.lau-F153.LA1103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flotteur de pêche 11-o.lau-F056.LA962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 09:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flotteur de pêche 11-o.lau-F055.LA1073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very well done! --Augustgeyler 10:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cartouchière - détails 11-o.lau-F169.LA1140-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceinture de guerrier - détails 11-o.lau-F135.LA935-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Galessandroni 18:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamiasciurus hudsonicus JRVdH 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamiasciurus hudsonicus JRVdH 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer saccharum UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochet de danse 11-o.lau-F145.LA990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Javelot - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F086.LA865-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leurre de pêche 11-o.lau-F057.LA962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer saccharum UL 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanita jacksonii UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 08:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamias striatus UL 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --痛 05:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamiasciurus hudsonicus UL 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --痛 05:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de Laukeni 11-o.lau-F105.LA918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanita jacksonii UL 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanita virosa UL 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer saccharum UL 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now --Imehling 07:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer saccharum UL 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer saccharum UL 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer saccharum UL 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice quality. Picture elements are very balanced. --Ra'ike 12:56, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Javelot - détails 11-o.lau-F086.LA865-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Javelot dentelé (détails) 11-o.lau-F143.LA864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parure nasale 11-o.lau-F266.LA1006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parures d'oreilles - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F270.LA1075-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parures d'oreilles - détails 11-o.lau-F270.LA1075-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:09, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! (Cotoneaster pictures)

Thank YOU very much !!! :-)) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:3035:810:403A:1:0:192D:8025 (talk) 23:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Celle qui a vu Courtois Fontaine.jpg

File:Celle qui a vu Courtois Fontaine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

186.172.118.169 22:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Japanese knotweed

Hi Cephas/Archives 2023, I came here to thank you for uploading the two files at the bottom of my post after seeing an article in the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/food/2023/may/27/squirrel-haggis-and-japanese-knotweed-reach-uk-menus-as-invasive-species-trend-grows and came to commons to check if we have any pictures of knotweed dishes pictures and found both of yours at:

• 

and

• 

Thanks again, Ottawahitech (talk) 16:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello Ottawahitech,

I didn't took the pictures, but I did uploaded them! Cephas (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Some help with svg maps

Hello, Cephas, I've been trying to make some svg range maps for sunbirds, and the ones I'm making are running into some errors. They display fine on Wikipedia and in the Commons preview, but when I open them from Commons, they display an error message (although I can still see the map fine). I learned how to use Inkscape very recently, and so I can't really figure out what's going wrong. Could you check and see if you can figure out the error? (links to maps 1, 2, 3 for reference) AryKun (talk) 15:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello Pinging @AryKun, I don't see anything wrong with your map. --Cephas (talk) 10:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Okay, must just be something wrong with my device. Thanks! AryKun (talk) 13:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Map edit request

Hi Cephas - another map edit request, please: File:Estrilda astrild map.svg to add a distinction between natural range (Subsaharan Africa, including islands in the Gulf of Guinea; retain as dark green), and feral distribution (everywhere else; dark grey or some other similar fairly inconspicuous colour). Thanks! - MPF (talk) 19:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks! - MPF (talk) 22:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Laval University misidentified images

Hi Cephas - I found a whole set of 35 misidentified images of Gleditsia triacanthos labelled as Robinia pseudoacacia from your Laval University upload, which need renaming and the descriptions correcting. I've put them in a temporary category Category:Gleditsia triacanthos misidentified as Robinia pseudoacacia as I don't have time to deal with them myself. Would it be possible for a robot to be set to reclassify them all? After it is done, the category can be deleted. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Pinging @MPF: I take care of it, thanks! --Cephas (talk) 12:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Pinging @MPF And what about the series Gleditsia triacanthos 15-p.bot-gled.tria-xxx in Category:Gleditsia triacanthos, should they be send in Catetory:Robinia pseudoacacia?

Many thanks! Their series Gleditsia triacanthos 15-p.bot-gled.tria-xxx are all correct; the leaves are the same as the ones I tagged :-) Of course most of their Robinia pseudoacacia (another 86 files!) were correct too, it was only the 35 I tagged that were misidentified - MPF (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Urocitellus richardsonii GNP 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Urocitellus richardsonii GNP 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lithobates catesbeianus PP.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lithobates catesbeianus PP.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Campephilus haematogaster vs. splendens

Hi friend, Campephilus splendens (new map needed) is split from C. haematogaster (map to be reviewed). Goods maps at IUCN for both. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 18:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Hector Bottai (talk) 20:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Xenops minutus vs. genibarbis

Hello, Xenops genibarbis (map OK) is split from X. minutus (map to be reviewed). Goods maps at IUCN for both. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 18:21, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Hector Bottai (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus GNP 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus GNP 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Tyrannus tyrannus

Hello. This very common and popular bird has a map (not yours) but is not accurate, no color descriptions, etc. I think it deserves one same style as other migratory birds. Good maps at IUCN and eBird. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 21:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Done. Cephas (talk) 16:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Hector Bottai (talk) 11:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sturnella neglecta GNP 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sturnella neglecta GNP 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bison bison bison GNP 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bison bison bison GNP 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Pseudosaltator rufiventris

Hello! Couldn't find a map for this very scarce bird. Good ones both Iucn and eBird. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 11:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Another very late Thanks! Hector Bottai (talk) 12:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sayornis saya GNP 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sayornis saya GNP 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cynomys ludovicianus GNP 21.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cynomys ludovicianus GNP 21.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leiothlypis peregrina Malus sp JRVdH 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leiothlypis peregrina Malus sp JRVdH 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Junco hyemalis UL 09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Junco hyemalis UL 09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Yet another map edit request!

Hi Cephas - File:Chamaea fasciata map.svg, the northern boundary is incorrect; there are no records for Washington, as the species is so sedentary that they cannot cross the Columbia River from Oregon into Washington (example ref: https://www.birdforum.net/opus/Wrentit ). Could you correct the map, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! It does go right up to the south bank of the Columbia River in Oregon (about another mm on your map, please!) - see e.g. iNaturalist mapping. And one more, please :-) File:Leucophaeus atricilla map.svg, the breeding area (resident purple, rather than wintering blue) should extend further south to include "West Indies, islands off Yucatan Pen., islands n of Venezuela, Trinidad and Tobago and to French Guiana" (ref.: IOC). Thanks again! - MPF (talk) 15:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Automolus cervinigularis split from ochrolaemus

Hello friend. Definitive split approved at IOC, Clements/eBird. Good maps for both at eBird. A. cervinigularis, new map, A. ochrolaemus to be reviewed. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 02:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!--Hector Bottai (talk) 11:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Asthenes sclateri lumped with Asthenes wyatii

Major classifications (IOC, Clements/eBird) lumped A. sclateri into A. wyatti. I suggest a new map merging both maps, because many wikis will take long time to update taxonomy. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 01:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!--Hector Bottai (talk) 11:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Pachyramphus salvini split from albogriseus

Good morning, more recent Clements/eBird 2023 changes. Good maps for both at eBird, P. salvini new map; P. albogriseus to be reviewed. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 13:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!--Hector Bottai (talk) 02:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Chlorophonia musica split in three

More changes. Chlorophonia musica (Current map is Euphonia musica), now Hispaniola only, split into C. sclateri (Puerto Rico) and C. flavifrons (Lesser Antilles). Goods maps at eBird. . Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 01:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Great! --Hector Bottai (talk) 18:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Sporophila iberaensis

Map needs review, new non-breeding area in southwest Brazil, see eBird map. Thanks Hector Bottai (talk) 17:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!--Hector Bottai (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Trogon rufus split

Trogon rufus split into T. rufus, T. tenellus, T. chrysochloros and T. cupreicauda at both IOC and Clements/eBird. Good maps at eBird. Spanish wiki on-going construction; wikispecies done. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 18:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!--Hector Bottai (talk) 21:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Nesotriccus murinus (former Phaeomyias murina) split

Nesotriccus murinus (former Phaeomyias murina) split into N. murinus (southern) and N. incomtus (northern). Good maps at eBird. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Perfect! --Hector Bottai (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

South America maps

Hi Cephas - all the South America bird maps (example File:Picumnus dorbignyanus map.svg) include the whole continent and offshore islands, so have a very tall portrait shape. This means they create lots of whitespace at wikispecies as they stretch well down past the text, pushing the Commons link and taxon identifiers half-way down to the centre of the earth. I realise it's a big task, but would you be able make landscape-shape copies of them, cropping just above and below the species' distribution so the map copies are much wider than tall? Let me know if it is feasible. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 18:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Pinging @MPF I understand that there is a page layout problem in wikispecies. I think that the problem should be solved at that level and not by modifying all maps. Aside from the fact that it would be a lot of work, I think it doesn't make sense to adapt an image format to compensate for a layout problem in a particular wikimedia project. The issue should be brought back to the administrator of wikispecies. --Cephas (talk) 19:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Apologies for the late reply, the ping didn't work (no idea why!) and I only just saw this now. It isn't a 'page layout problem', it is just that the nature of wikispecies is that pages do not have a lot of text, so tall images very quickly extend below the lowest text. - MPF (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

✴ Happy Holidays, Simon ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Map request

Hi Cephas - on File:Myiopsitta monachus map.svg the map includes the native range, plus just one (Florida) of the many areas worldwide where there are feral populations. Could you edit the map to either remove Florida (my preference), or alternatively to make it global with all the feral populations included (with different colours for native and feral!)? Thanks!

PS all the best for Christmas! - MPF (talk) 23:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! And another, please: File:Tigrisoma lineatum map.svg the species has expanded significantly south, throughout Paraguay and the Buenos Aires area of Argentina; see IUCN and iNaturalist sightings (click 'Map'). Thanks! - MPF (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks! And another needing a spot of revision, File:Cyanocitta stelleri map.svg the distribution in California is less extensive than it should be; compare this map from the California NatureMapping Program. Thanks again! - MPF (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)