Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Сержант Пеппер!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Кажется, этот дом к Коробовской фабрике и к Вяземским отношения не имел. Коробовская фабрика - это выше по Баумана, два двухэтажных дома внутри квартала, их с улицы почти и не видно. Kaluga.2012 (talk) 12:03, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Сержант Пеппер,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Сержант Пеппер,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 116. Троицкая церковь в Доможирке на берегу Чудского озера..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality --Halavar 16:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 593. Остафьево. Беседка (нач. 19 в., восстановлена в 2000-х г.г.)..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame of the wire and camera, but Sergeant Pepper took a good picture.--Jebulon 18:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Демьяново. Хозяйственные службы и флигели..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support QI, good picture IMO, but the tree of the right has minor CAs--Lmbuga 21:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
In any case, it's QI for me--Lmbuga 21:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Успенская церковь бывшего Епифанского монастыря (18 в)..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bit noisy but ok overall --Poco a poco 19:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Торжок. Борисоглебский монастырь. Свечная башня (1809, перестр. в 1860-е)..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Методика edit

  • Вижу ваши снимки из Переславля, из Данилова монастыря, однако никак не могу понять методику. Скажите пожалуйста, зачем вы сделали их именно так? Какой принцип заложен в композицию, в выбор освещения и ракурсов? Спасибо за подсказку. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Волжская башня (1658-69)..JPG edit

 
File:Волжская башня (1658-69)..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Николай Васильевич Белавин (talk) 07:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Reply