Hi, fellow Hebrew Wikipedian. I see you also discovered WikiCommons. :-) MathKnight 17:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

As you can tell from my belated response, I haven't really discovered it. user:דניאל צבי 13:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

! אתה בצרות edit

...kidding :) Gridge 16:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC). רגע, עוד לא עשיתי כלום... Daniel Tzvi 16:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Madaba Jerusalem Mosaic Closeup.jpg edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done. Daniel Tzvi 06:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 360b1c578b3e2948e4bded63ddbe6aa4 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category: Gesetzl Geschützt edit

I do not understand the sense of this curious named category?

„gesetzlich geschützt“ means in German “law protected”. A possible abbreviation is „gesetzl. geschützt“ (with fullstop respectively dot and lower case letter at the beginnings). But in this way it means nothing!? And what is it good for?--Kürschner (talk) 11:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Its good for nothing - it just shows that I don't know German, and I thought that Gesetzl Geschützt is the name of the illustartor. I'll have the category deleted. Daniel Tzvi 18:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Theodor Herzl? ;) --Kürschner (talk) 18:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:David Yeshaya Silberbusch.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:David Yeshaya Silberbusch.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:David Yeshaya Silberbusch.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 03:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Avraham Schwadron.jpg edit

 
File:Avraham Schwadron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ldorfman (talk) 22:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply