Open main menu

Please review new License status on Logotipo Fundación BambergEdit

Hi JuTa,

I've just updated the license as didn't include it on the first revision.

Could you just check if everything is Ok?

Regards

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Japeon (talk • contribs) 17:24, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Aporto información sobre licencia imagen y derechos de autor imagenes Bertha TrujilloEdit

Hola @JuTa me dejaste un aviso en mi página de discusión sobre los derechos de autor de una imagen Bertha Trujillo. Es mi primera aportación a commons por lo que no estoy muy familiarizada con el proceso.

Cuando subí las tres imágenes puse el enlace del sitio web de dondelas obtuve, son recorte de un video cuya licencia de derechos en la misma web indica que no se ha podido evaluar. Esta información la puse en la imagen, junto con la explicación que te escribo aquí. No discuto si es correcto o no el borrado, pues acepto lo que me indicas. Quisiera aportar la información para evitar el borrado, o al menos aprender mejor el procedimiento, ¿por favor puesdes ayudarme? enlace del lugar original del recorte (video):

Fecha 13 de abril de 1956 Fuente Biblioteca de la Universidad de Virginia, Colección de películas de noticias WSLS-TV (Roanoke, VA), de 1951 a 1971 https://dp.la/item/d6f0df9761f364baf8e87456c2c2e047 Autor Desconozco

esto es lo que pone en la web original: Standardized Rights Statement This Rights Statement should be used for Items for which the copyright status is unknown and for which the data provider has not undertaken an effort to determine the copyright status of the work. http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/

y este es el enlace sobre los derechos de autor que se indica en la misma web:

https://rightsstatements.org/page/CNE/1.0/?language=en


y esta la web de donde obtuve las magenes y que aporté a las imagenes com he indicado mas arriba: https://dp.la/item/d6f0df9761f364baf8e87456c2c2e047

Espero que sea suficiente información, o al menos sea válida

muchas gracias por tu comprensión y ayuda, un saludo --Ytha67 (talk) 10:12, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Ytha67, there images are very likely still protected by copyright. If they realy got published anonymously they are likely protected till 70 years after publication - otherwise till 70 years after the death of the author. For a start of reading about commons copyright rules please see Commons:Copyright. regards --JuTa 10:21, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


Muchas gracias por la respuesta, en la web indica que es de 1956, no se decir más acerca de la información que se indica en la web de la Universidad de Virginia, puedo buscar por si encuentro otras fuentes del video o la fuente original. ¿quieres decir que no es válida entonces? ¿dispongo de algún plazo para encontrar otras fuentes?
Thank you very much for the response, on the web indicates that it is 1956, not to say more about the information that is indicated on the website of the University of Virginia, I can search if I find other sources of the video or the original source. Do you mean that it is not valid then? Do I have a deadline to find other sources? saludos --Ytha67 (talk) 10:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ytha67, you have a week to correct the license information on the file description pages. Copyright laws vary from country to country. For Commons they must be free within the USA and the country of origin. If you can find a valid license template on Commons:Copyright tags you might add that license to the file description pages. regards. --JuTa 10:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


Gracias por el tiempo adicional. He encontrado esta información en la web de EEUU, reconozco mi ignorancia para comprender si a licencia es hasta 2018, transcribo la información:
Thanks for the additional time. I have found this information on the US web, I acknowledge my ignorance to understand if the license is until 2018, I transcribe the information:
 Copyright 2008-2018 Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
 You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
 You can obtain a copy of the License at
   https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 limitations under the License.

saludos --Ytha67 (talk) 10:55, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Ytha67, I dont think the University of Virginia cannot apply any license to those images, because they didnt created them. regards --JuTa 10:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
PS and according Commons:Copyright_tags/Country-specific_tags#Colombia the images must be minumum 80 year old, the means created before 1939. regards --JuTa 11:04, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Muchas gracias por tu ayuda, hasta aquí llego, a pesar de encontrar la fuente original del video en España, sería la filmoteca nacional, y de que este documento es de autor desconocido, las leyes Españolas se apropian del derecho de autor por estar publicado en la filmoteca nacional, por lo que entiendo que es imposible su uso, tendría derecho de difusión siempre y cuando abone un canon por mi parte. La ley permite su uso para investigación, pero creo que es complicarse demasiado. Reitero el agradecimiento, entiendo que las imagenes deban ser eliminadas si no cumplen con la politica de W Commons. Estaré más atenta en otra ocasión. Saludos
Thank you very much for your help, until here I arrived, despite finding the original source of the video in Spain, it would be the national film library, and that this document is an unknown author, the Spanish laws take ownership of the copyright because it is published in the national film library, so I understand that its use is impossible, I would have the right to broadcast as long as I pay a fee for my part. The law allows its use for research, but I think it's too complicated. I reiterate the gratitude, I understand that the images should be eliminated if they do not comply with the W Commons policy. I will be more attentive on another occasion. Regards --Ytha67 (talk) 12:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

PR tertiary shieldsEdit

Hello! I'm currently interested in the fact that the files called PR_tertiary_XX.svg (where XX is a number) are renamed or deleted in favor of Ellipse_sign_XX.svg. The reason is that the files in the Puerto Rico tertiary highway shields category have the same design as those found in the Elliptical route shields category, and in this last category are all the files that are needed to cover all the numbers missing in the Puerto Rico tertiary highway shields category. For that reason I took the liberty of using the duplicate template in the files that I made.

I send you this message because I don't know if I did well to place that template or any other change previously made. I thank you in advance for any help you can give me in this situation. Yamil Rivera (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Well, they were binary identicly. Maybe you add the required description and categories. --JuTa 06:15, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

I want this image to be uploaded by cropping.Edit

I want your help to upload this photo File:Chajing Khunou.jpg

by cropping, how to upload again by cropping this photo again Awangba Mangang (talk) 06:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
use the crop tool. regards. --JuTa 06:05, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Kategorien für NachnamenEdit

Warum müssen jetzt doch wieder manuell Kategorien für Nachnamen gesetzt werden, obwohl die Nachnamenkategorie auch über wikidata geliefert wird? Wir bei DEFAULTSORT nicht mit Doppelpunkt gearbeitet statt Pipe --NeverDoING (talk) 15:37, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi NeverDoING, wenn in den Vornamen Umlaute o.ä. vorkommen, werden die Einträge dort falsch sortiert. Dann muss man eben (nochmals) manuell kategorisieren und sortieren. Gruß --JuTa 21:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Das ist klar, auch wenn ich nicht verstehe warum die Software entsprechend geändert wird. Aber warum muss dann die Kategorie für die Nachnamen noch einmal manuell eingefügt werden? --NeverDoING (talk) 21:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Ja, weil dort sonst eben falsch sortiert würde, z.B. Vorname Ägidius wäre nach Z sortiert und nicht unter A. Die Wikidata-Box sortiert ja automatisch in den Surname Kategorien nach Vornamen, und wenn dort Umlaute o.ä. vorkommen ist dort die Sortierung falsch, außer man kategorisiert nochmals manuell mit korrekter Sortierung. Gruß --JuTa 21:13, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Schau mal, wo Category:Ágoston Schmidt in Category:Schmidt (surname) einsortiert ist. Gruß --JuTa 21:16, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Das weiß ich ich meinte es auch nicht. Schau mal in [1] warum hast Du da die Nachnamen-Kategorie wieder eingefügt (+ Jacques-Joseph-Francois)?--NeverDoING (talk) 21:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Ich habe die Nachnamens-Kategorie wieder eingefügt, weill die Person dort sonst über die wikidata box unter ihrem Vornamen mit Sonderzeichen einsortiert würde, sie sollte jedoch ohne Sonderzeichen sortiert werden, und somit die Sortierung falsch wäre. (Ich wiederhol mich). In François ist ein ç. Wenn in Category:Vogüé (surname) also z.B. noch ein Jacques-Joseph-Franz dazukommt, würde der François danach einsortiert, sollte aber davor stehen. Gruß --JuTa 21:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Warum wird dann nicht die Software angepasst. Es macht doch keinen Sinn den Vorteil von wikidata infobox zu nutzen und dann doch bei jedem kleinen Sonderfall wieder alles manuell machen zu müssen. Kopfschüttel - Gute Nacht!--NeverDoING (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Du kannst gerne einenen "Feature-Request" starten. Ich hab' aber wenig Hoffnung dass der bald realisiert würde. Gruß --JuTa 21:51, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "JuTa".