Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 34 super héros!

-- 20:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, 34 super héros!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

COM:OVERCAT edit

Hello 34 super héros!

Thank you for uploading files on Commons.

Please add images to most relevant categories, for example Category:Aircraft of the French Air Force‎, not in generic ones like Category:Air force of France. Generic categories could be easily become overcrowded and useless for search.
Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 16:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

RAID pics edit

Bonjour Bapti (je ne suis pas hyper doué en anglais et puis on est entre francophones).

Bizarre, bizarre... Depuis quand il y a un copyright concernant le logo d'une entité gouvernementale (une administration publique) ? En principe, il n'y a que le travail personnel du photographe qui peut être copyright... Sinon tous les insignes et logos d'administrations civiles ou militaires seraient copyright... Si ça ne concerne que le travail du photographe, il suffit de prendre soi-même la photo (d'un insigne du RAID ou même d'une autre photo le représentant) et ça devient une photo personnelle... --34 super héros (talk) 07:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re.
Le logo du RAID est présent sur le site de la Police Nationale (du Ministère de l'Intérieur); à priori, je n'ai pas vu de mention de copyright (ce qui est logique)... Qu'en penses-tu ? --34 super héros (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour,
J'ai supprimé le logo du RAID dans une série d'images importées par un même contributeur. Celle qui m'a mis la puce à l'oreille, c'est une image des troupes créditée à l'AFP, donc clairement une violation des droits d'auteurs. Sauf erreur, ce logo est aussi sous droits d'auteurs classique, c'est en tout cas le régime par défaut en l'absence de mention contraire (les logos des administrations civiles et militaires françaises ne sont pas sous licence libre et importés sous régime de fair use sur Wikipédia en français).--Bapti 15:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Bonsoir (il se fait tard),
Merci de m'avoir éclairé... --34 super héros (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Caserne (ancienne EAI), Montpellier..JPG edit

 
File:Caserne (ancienne EAI), Montpellier..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 09:08, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Caserne Av Lepic Montpellier (ancienne EAI).JPG edit

 
File:Caserne Av Lepic Montpellier (ancienne EAI).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 09:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Franck Passi 83.jpg edit

 
File:Franck Passi 83.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

92.133.127.245 15:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Photo volée par le quotidien ML. edit

merci de m'avoir signalé cette utilisation abusive, je vais sûrement leur envoyer une lettre --Benoit-caen (talk) 20:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Flickrworker (talk) 22:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Coccinelles MHR championnes 2014.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coccinelles MHR championnes 2014.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 17:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Les choses sont pourtant très claires : le fichier vient de cette page Flickr (sous licence CC BY-SA 2.0)... Je viens de modifier la page en mettant le lien, mais la source était déjà indiquée clairement; simplement, il n'y avait pas le lien direct et c'est vrai que j'ai renommé la photo (il n'y avait que des chiffres). --34 super héros (talk) 17:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Daniel Kirkpatrick ou Pierre Bernard edit

Bonjour ! Je viens de voir tes messages, merci pour ta vigilance et tes corrections :) Léna (talk) 15:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bruno Martini edit

Bonjour 34 super héros,

En octobre 2015, vous avez ajouté un photo de Bruno Martini, verrez ici. Vous avez marqué et nommée le photo comme datant de 'juillet 2015'. La data exif et la date que vous avez mis comme date sont '21 juillet 2014'. Pourriez-vous regarder à cette date et changer le nom du photo ou la date dans la description? Merci en avance, RonnieV (talk) 14:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour RonnieV, la bonne date est bien 2015, mais la date exif était fausse. L'appareil photo n'avait plus de batterie et s'était éteint et j'avais mal re-initialisé la date (bad date reset of the camera). 2015 est la vraie date. Cordialement. --34 super héros (talk) 11:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour 34 super hëros,
Merci de votre explication et de la correction de la date. Cordialement, RonnieV (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply