User talk:Ajepbah/Archive/2016

Nachnutzungsanfrage

Hallo Ajepbah, falls du das Bild nicht sowieso auf der Beo hast, dann schau mal hier File talk:Lutherkirche (Hamburg-Wellingsbüttel).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo @Túrelio: , danke für den Hinweis. --Ajepbah (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Nachträgliche Positionsbestimmung per OpenStreetMap?

Moin Ajepbah! Gibt es in OSM die Möglichkeit, aus der Karte die geografische Position eines Ortes zu ermitteln? Bei Google Maps geht das sehr einfach, bei OSM bin ich bisher dran gescheitert. Und das ist sehr schade, denn die OSM-Karten sind viel viel besser als die Google-Karten. Man kann nachträglich deutlich besser erkennen, wo man war, vor allem wenn man "draussen" war, man sich also an Feldwegen, Waldrändern oder Bächen orientiert hat. Ich muss mich jetzt immer mit der gröberen Schätzung aus den Google-Karten begnügen. Aber ich werde demnächst auch damit experimentieren, GPS-Tracks aufzunehmen, dann hat sich das Problem vielleicht für mich bald erledigt. Viele Grüße --Dirtsc (talk) 07:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo @Dirtsc: , wenn Du auf die Karte doppelklickst, sollte in der URL die aktuelle Position angezeigt werden. Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 20:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Danke für die Antwort. Wenn ich mit dem Fragezeichen-Cursor an eine beliebige Stelle klicke scheint das zu funktionieren. Ich hatte gehofft, man würde das etwas deutlicher sehen, aber so geht es ja auch. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 07:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Am Freitag ist dann mein Experiment zum aufzeichnen eines GPS-Tracks mit dem Smartphone gelungen. Heute habe ich auch die Daten als EXIF in die entstandenen Fotos schreiben lassen. Damit bin ich Dir zwar ungefähr 3 Jahre hinterher, Du konntest das ja schon bei der Heißluftballonfahrt, aber ich glaube, so dürften einige zukünftige Fototouren schon einfacher werden. Gerade wenn ich in Grünanlagen fotografiere. Ich habe jetzt übrigens Aufzeichnung und Zuordnung mit myTracks gemacht, weil HoudahGeo, das Du damals empfohlen hattest, die Fotos nicht korrekt auf die Spur verteilt hatte. Schade eigentlich, denn es hat eine übersichtlichere Oberfläche als myTracks. Viele Grüße --Dirtsc (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Schön, dass es funktioniert hat. Ich verwende für die Zuordnung der Trackdaten den GeoSetter, der eine einfache Positions-Korrektur aufgrund der Abweichung GPS-/Kamera-Uhr ermöglicht. --Ajepbah (talk) 14:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Using Albrechtstraße 7 (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Gebäude Schweriner Straße.Südfassade.1.ajb.jpg

Hi Ajepbah,

I will use your photo of Albrechtstraße 7 in a talk to my colleagues in order to visualize the fisheye effect. Thanks for releasing it under a CC license!

Cheers, Martin

Hi Martin, thanks for information ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 19:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Private Nutzung eines Fotos der Feuewache Blankenese

Halli Hallo Mein Name ist Gretel Dwenger und auf der Suche nach Gebäuden, die mich in meiner Kindheit begleiteten. Mein Vater war bis zu seiner Pensionierung bei der Berufsfeuerwehr in Blankenese und die letzten Jahre an der Wache in Osdorf beschäftigt. Wir als Kinder waren oft zu Besuch in Blankenes an der Wache. Nun meine Frage Dürfte ich eines evtl. auch zwei Ihrer Bilder als Malvorlage (Kreidezeichnung) benutzen. Selbstverständlich erhalten Sie von mir ein Foto meines Werkes zugesendet. Ich bitte Sie auch, meine Bilder in meinen Block (http://gretelskleinegalerie.blogspot.de/)bzw. auf meiner Homepage (http://gretels-kleine-malschule.npage.de/) veröffentlichen zu dürfen. Ich würde mich über eine Antwort freuen

Mit freundlichem Gruß Gretel Dwenger gretel050558@yahoo.de

Hallo Frau Dwenger, gerne dürfen Sie meine Bilder als Vorlage für Ihre Zeichnungen benutzen ;-) Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Vielen, vielen Dank dafür Mit freundlichem Gruß Gretel Dwenger

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo Ajepbah,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Glückwunsch!

Das erste WLM-Bild 2016 ist von Dir! Eine Minute schneller als der Bremer Kollege. Und gerade das ist als Hamburger natürlich eine besondere Genugtuung. Viel Spaß weiterhin, --Dirtsc (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

:-) --Ajepbah (talk) 22:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Schon wieder das gleiche wie jedes Jahr...

Kann man nicht mal einen Bot schreiben, der es unmöglich macht, bei WLM Motive wie File:Hamburg, Speicherstadt, Wasserschloss -- 2016 -- 3230-6.jpg hochzuladen? Der Sinn war doch mal, Sachen zu fotografieren, für die es noch keine Bilder gibt, oder? Bis heute Abend, --Dirtsc (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Ajepbah!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handelsschule Am Lämmermarkt (Hamburg-St. Georg).Keramisches Objekt 2.2.29328.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jenisch-Haus (Hamburg-Othmarschen).1.18006.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Ajepbah!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

und herzlichen Dank für deine wunderbaren Fotos aus Lübeck! --Concord (talk) 23:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

gerne doch ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 07:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilandskirche (Hamburg-Uhlenhorst).Turm.Uhr.2.24409.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 09:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Dom (Lübeck-Altstadt).Westfenster (Quinte).Detail.2.201.ajb.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom (Lübeck-Altstadt).Westfenster (Quinte).Detail.2.201.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:02, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Süd (Hamburg-Altstadt).04.29971.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and great composition.--ArildV 07:49, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sprinkenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Innenhof.3.29135.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Kreisornamente.2.Südflügel.Mitte.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handwerkskammer (Hamburg-Neustadt).Haupttrakt.Fassade.Schmuckmauerwerk.12703.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haynstraße 2, 4 (Hamburg-Eppendorf).Portal.1.29253.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilandskirche (Hamburg-Uhlenhorst).Turm.4.24409.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilandskirche (Hamburg-Uhlenhorst).Turm.Uhr.1.24409.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality to me. If you see something I missed, please move this to Consensual review. -- Ikan Kekek 18:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.01.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Kreisornamente.1.Südflügel.links.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Kreisornamente.5.Nordflügel.links.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Vogel Phönix.2.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a dust spot --A.Savin 13:17, 6 October 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for review, dust spot removed. --Ajepbah 17:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC) OK with me --A.Savin 16:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haynstraße 2, 4 (Hamburg-Eppendorf).Portal.Detail.1.29253.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haynstraße 31 (Hamburg-Eppendorf).Eingang.20458.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boltenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Dachterrasse.Detail..29123.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really exciting but good quality --Poco a poco 08:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boltenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).3.29123.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haynstraße 29 (Hamburg-Eppendorf).Eingang.20457.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 14:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 73-77 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Von-Höveln-Gang.Wappen.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Only weak support: sharpness is borderline IMO --A.Savin 17:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC){o}until identification.--Jebulon 12:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)sufficiently identified now.--Jebulon 16:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 73-77 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Von-Höveln-Gang.Wappen.links.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 7 October 2016 (UTC){o}until identification.--Jebulon 12:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)sufficiently identified now.--Jebulon 16:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 73-77 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Von-Höveln-Gang.Wappen.oben.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC){o}until identification.--Jebulon 12:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)sufficiently identified now.--Jebulon 16:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 73-77 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Von-Höveln-Gang.Wappen.rechts.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 7 October 2016 (UTC){o}until identification.--Jebulon 12:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)sufficiently identified now.--Jebulon 16:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Petri (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).Turm.2.14919.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Points tower had been a little sharper, but good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Petri (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).Turm.Uhr.14919.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Petri (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).Portal.Detail.1.14919.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michaelis (Hamburg-Neustadt).Turm.13855.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jenisch-Haus (Hamburg-Othmarschen).Südfassade.Portikus.18006.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jenisch-Haus (Hamburg-Othmarschen).Südfassade.Detail.2.18006.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jenisch-Haus (Hamburg-Othmarschen).Westfassade.18006.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Instenhäuser (Hamburg-Othmarschen).6.30392.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuer Kamp 31 (Hamburg-St. Pauli).Treppenaufgang West.Relief.13328.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I love that relief, which looks like an Art Deco representation of the dignity of this kind of labor. If it had more nearly pinpoint focus and was in less glary light, I would have been tempted to nominate it for FP. But as it is, it's good quality and a nice QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagerstraße 9 (Hamburg-St. Pauli).Detail.06.13288.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagerstraße 9 (Hamburg-St. Pauli).Detail.02.13288.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough to be a Q1photo, only the corner might have ben less sharper --Michielverbeek 06:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserturm Sternschanze (Hamburg-Sternschanze).2.19117.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dithmarscher Straße 1 (Hamburg-Dulsberg).2.22709.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction needed --A.Savin 23:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment @A.Savin: Thanks for review. The converging lines are intended - I wanted to accentuate in particular the broad projective roof of this 1950s ensemble. --Ajepbah 18:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment Just a comment for your answer, in my opinion by giving more room and correcting the perspectives, you'd have given more accentuation to this particular architecture --Christian Ferrer 20:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Support in fact fine for me --Christian Ferrer 20:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilandskirche (Hamburg-Uhlenhorst).Fenster.1.24409.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Doesn't have pinpoint focus, but good enough for QI. Nice motif. -- Ikan Kekek 09:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilandskirche (Hamburg-Uhlenhorst).Hof.2.30988.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - I think the overall quality of this picture is good enough for QI. Although the water spouts are out of focus, as in the detail picture, they're a much smaller percentage of the picture. However, if anyone disagrees, please feel free to take it to Consensual Review. -- Ikan Kekek 09:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 49 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Bruskaus Gang.Portal.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 37 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Fassadendetail.3.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 37 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Fassadendetail.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilehaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Blick von Osten.2.29132.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilehaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Innenhof.1.29132.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilehaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Burchardstraße.Detail.2.29133.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilehaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Burchardstraße.3.29133.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 73-77 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Von-Höveln-Gang.Eingang.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 1 dustspot in the sky --Christian Ferrer 06:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)  Done @Christian Ferrer: Dust spot removed, thanks for the hint --Ajepbah 17:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haynstraße 2, 4 (Hamburg-Eppendorf).Portal.Detail.4.29253.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:24, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denkmal für die Gefallenen beider Weltkriege (Hamburg-Altstadt).2.11980.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flakbunker IV (Hamburg-St. Pauli).Detail.1.13188.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brahmskontor (Hamburg-Neustadt).Johannes-Brahms-Platz 1.Treppenhaus.8.29190.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The center of the picture is IMO a bit overexposed, but good quality and... very nice!--Lmbuga 17:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.02.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Detail.2.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction. Please have a look to the top. --XRay 11:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint! --Ajepbah 12:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)  Support Thank you.Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Vogel Phönix.1.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Kreisornamente.6.Nordflügel.Mitte.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flakbunker IV (Hamburg-St. Pauli).Detail.5.13188.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schule Curschmannstraße (Hamburg-Hoheluft-Ost).07.29577.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (though unforunately the plaque on the right is cropped). --Tsui 07:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handelsschule Am Lämmermarkt (Hamburg-St. Georg).Keramisches Objekt 2.1.29328.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handelsschule Am Lämmermarkt (Hamburg-St. Georg).Detail.8.29328.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well worth seeing composition. --Tsui 07:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Seefahrt (Hamburg-Altstadt).3.29139.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Elbstraße 281 (Hamburg-Ottensen).Getreidespeicher.2.15283.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 11:58, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altonaer Kaispeicher (Hamburg-Ottensen).5.15274.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:15, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Elbstraße 39 (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).16216.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:15, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Elbstraße 27 (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).2.16542.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 11:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bugenhagenkirche (Hamburg-Barmbek-Süd),Turm.Westseite.Uhr.22360.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trostbrücke (Hamburg-Altstadt).Skulptur 'St. Ansgar'.1.12071.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very hard lighting by clear sun is not the best choice for such objects. In all other matters very good, so QI. --Smial 09:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trostbrücke (Hamburg-Altstadt).Skulptur 'St. Ansgar'.2.12071.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very hard lighting by clear sun is not the best choice for such objects. In all other matters very good, so QI. --Smial 09:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Marien (Lübeck-Altstadt).Dachreiter.3.827.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat tight crop at left side. But ok for QI --Smial 08:53, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.03.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.04.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Detail.1.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Vogel Phönix.3.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo,

hiermit möchte ich Dir im Namen der Jury zu Deiner erfolgreichen Teilnahme am diesjährigen Denkmal-Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland ganz herzlich gratulieren.

Insgesamt wurden in diesem Jahr rund 39.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen hochgeladen und für die Bebilderung von Artikeln und Listen in der Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt. Aus dieser großen Zahl heraus erreichten Deine obigen tollen Fotos Plätze unter den Top 100 – ein Erfolg, der dementsprechend hoch einzuschätzen ist.

Die 100 Bilder aller Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger kannst Du Dir hier anschauen.

Ich hoffe, dass der Wettbewerb Dir mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet hat wie uns. Auf ein Wiedersehen im Jahr 2017!

i. A. --Nicola (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denkmal für die Gefallenen beider Weltkriege (Hamburg-Altstadt).4.11980.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flakbunker IV (Hamburg-St. Pauli).Detail.6.13188.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brahmskontor (Hamburg-Neustadt).Johannes-Brahms-Platz 1.Treppenhaus.2.29190.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 06:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miramar-Haus (Hamburg-Altstadt).3.29138.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miramar-Haus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Portal.3.29138.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mohlenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Detail.29134.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mohlenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Hermes (Kuöhl).1.29134.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Petri (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).Turm.1.14919.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodelschwinghkirche (Hamburg-Winterhude).3.crop.24406.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuer Kran (Hamburg-Altstadt).4.11777.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 11:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaffeebörse (Hamburg-HafenCity).Börsensaal.Detail.1.12424.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Kaffeebörse (Hamburg-HafenCity).Börsensaal.3.12424.ajb.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaffeebörse (Hamburg-HafenCity).Börsensaal.3.12424.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 10:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Kaffeebörse (Hamburg-HafenCity).Börsensaal.Glasmalerei.2.12424.ajb.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaffeebörse (Hamburg-HafenCity).Börsensaal.Glasmalerei.2.12424.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 10:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handwerkskammer (Hamburg-Neustadt).Giebel.Innungsflügel.Kleine Seejungfrau.12703.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Handwerkskammer (Hamburg-Neustadt).Haupttrakt.Großer Saal.Fenster (Czeschka).Detail.1.12703.ajb.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handwerkskammer (Hamburg-Neustadt).Haupttrakt.Großer Saal.Fenster (Czeschka).Detail.1.12703.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (Too?) Enough supply pixels, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handwerkskammer (Hamburg-Neustadt).Haupttrakt.Fassade.Detail.2.12703.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handwerkskammer (Hamburg-Neustadt).Giebel.Haupttrakt.1.12703.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit tight that crop for my taste but still OK. --Basotxerri 07:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilehaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Burchardplatz.Detail.07.29133.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks all right. A bit noisy, but resolution is high, so that's not too bad. It's also difficult to get the focus right here, and not aim at the grid fence in front of the subject - you did that well. --Peulle 07:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Süd (Hamburg-Altstadt).01.12060.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kajen 6 (Hamburg-Altstadt).Fassadendetail.11870.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good idea. The focus is not pinpoint, but I think this is pretty clearly a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boltenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Fassadendetail.2.29123.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurt-Schumacher-Haus (Hamburg-St. Georg).Treppenhaus.Detail.13746.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Sprinkenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Innenhof.1.29135.ajb.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Smial (talk) 07:41, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

@Smial: Thank you for nomination :-) --Ajepbah (talk) 23:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Da nich für. Du lieferst nu seit Jahren Bilder im Bereich "solide" bis "Spitze" ein, ohne billige Effekte, und beim Sichten in der Vorjury für WLM2016 waren die für mich unter all dem, sorry, Schrott jedesmal eine Freude und Erholung. Da müssen auch FP-Bapperl her, finde ich. --Smial (talk) 07:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Danke, das ist mal eine Aufmunterung ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Schwebender Engel mit betend erhobenen Händen.3.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kunstmann.Trauernde.4.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Fensterumrahmung.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Kreisornamente.4.Südflügel.Mitte.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptfeuerwache Berliner Tor (Hamburg-St. Georg).Fassade Westphalensweg.2.29205.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptfeuerwache Berliner Tor (Hamburg-St. Georg).Schlauchturm.1.29205.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Two dust spots on the sky, but OK anyway --A.Savin 12:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment Dust spots removed - hopefully the correct ones ;-) Thank you for the hint! --Ajepbah 19:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptfeuerwache Berliner Tor (Hamburg-St. Georg).Westphalensweg 1.Schriftzug.1.29205.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus der Seefahrt (Hamburg-Altstadt).2.29139.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Brightness is on the high side and focus is not pinpoint, but I think a consensus would consider this in the QI range. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Petri (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).Portal.Detail.2.14919.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodelschwinghkirche (Hamburg-Winterhude).5.24406.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stellahaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).1.29126.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sprinkenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Innenhof.1.29135.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice (i.e. give it a try at FPC) --Poco a poco 06:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stellahaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Detail.29126.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilehaus und Sprinkenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).1.29133.29135.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chilehaus (Hamburg-Altstadt).Bauschmuck.Kuöhl.Burchardplatz.Detail.03.29133.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brahmskontor (Hamburg-Neustadt).Johannes-Brahms-Platz 1.Treppenhaus.7.29190.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:47, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uhrmacherfachschule (Hamburg-Ottensen).Uhr.16041.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.09.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Elbstraße 27 (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).Silo.2.16542.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seemannshöft (Hamburg-Waltershof).1.13167.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat noisy, but still OK for me. There's a spot in the sky, could you remove it, please? --Basotxerri 09:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @Basotxerri: Thank you for review: Some birds stamped out, slightly denoised --Ajepbah 11:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Lucasbosch 14:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seemannshöft (Hamburg-Waltershof).Detail.2.13167.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handelsschule Am Lämmermarkt (Hamburg-St. Georg).Detail.1.29328.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miramar-Haus (Hamburg-Altstadt).4.29138.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neue Burg 1 (Hamburg-Altstadt).4.12069.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dithmarscher Straße 1 (Hamburg-Dulsberg).1.22709.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Süd (Hamburg-Altstadt).07.12060.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schule Alter Teichweg (Hamburg-Dulsberg).Treppenhausturm.Wappen.2.22669.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharp focus to main object --Michielverbeek 07:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schule Curschmannstraße (Hamburg-Hoheluft-Ost).10.29577.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilandskirche (Hamburg-Uhlenhorst).30988.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object, but I think the church is a bit overprocessed --Michielverbeek 06:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)  Question What kind of overprocessing do you mean exactly? --Ajepbah 19:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC) I think it is too white, especially the tower. Also the white of the windows is quiet strong. I think it is an improvement if you would make the church a bit darker --Michielverbeek 06:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @Michielverbeek: Thank you for review - white reduced, is it better now? --Ajepbah 20:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC) Yes it is looking a little better, a week support --Michielverbeek 06:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.07.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boltenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Dachterrasse.1.29123.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurt-Schumacher-Haus (Hamburg-St. Georg).Eingang.13746.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högerdamm 27, Woltmanstraße 24 (Hamburg-Hammerbrook).14138.14149.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neue Burg 1 (Hamburg-Altstadt).5.12069.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.05.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check the image. IMO it'S too bright. --XRay 07:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @XRay: Thank you for review. Is it OK now, or should I reduce the brightness even more? --Ajepbah 12:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 12:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.08.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check the image. IMO it's too bright. --XRay 07:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @XRay: Thank you for review. Is it OK now, or should I reduce the brightness even more? --Ajepbah 12:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 12:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Ohlsdorf (Hamburg-Ohlsdorf).Neues Krematorium.Uhr.Ostseite.29622.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kajen 10 (Hamburg-Altstadt).2.11871.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurt-Schumacher-Allee 16 (Hamburg-St. Georg).13747.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom (Lübeck-Altstadt).Marcussen-Orgel.crop.201.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty good, but would you consider lowering the light from the windows and sharpening and/or reducing noise a bit? -- Ikan Kekek 06:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @Ikan Kekek: : Thank you for review, lights and noise reduced. --Ajepbah 20:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Arguably, the highlights on the organ may be reduced a bit more than necessary, but that's certainly an improvement overall. -- Ikan Kekek 22:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trostbrücke (Hamburg-Altstadt).Skulptur 'St. Ansgar'.3.12071.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montanhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Eingang.11874.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finanzamt Steinstraße (Hamburg-Altstadt).Fassade Bugenhagenstraße.Detail.1.29132.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brahmskontor (Hamburg-Neustadt).Johannes-Brahms-Platz 1.Treppenhaus.4.29190.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 49 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Bruskaus Gang.Portal.Wappen.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsichtbrücke (Hamburg-Winterhude).Seite Außenalster.Detail.1.28987.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsichtbrücke (Hamburg-Winterhude).Seite Außenalster.Pfeiler.Detail.1.28987.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 19:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dohlenweg 17 (Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord).Eingang.Detail.22912.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lagerstraße 9 (Hamburg-St. Pauli).Detail.04.13288.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom (Lübeck-Altstadt).Dachreiter.1.201.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, too warm/purple colors. --C messier 11:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @C messier: Thank you for review, WB adjusted. --Ajepbah 22:37, 16 November 2016 (UTC)  Support OK now. --C messier 09:52, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Große Elbstraße 281 (Hamburg-Ottensen).Getreidespeicher.15283.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with more contrast. --XRay 07:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gehrckens Hof (Hamburg-Altstadt).2.11776.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it's leaning in on both sides. Please check your image. Thank you. --XRay 07:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Ermell 22:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @XRay: Thank you for review, perspective corrected (building only - the wall in foreground is not vertical) --Ajepbah 22:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuer Kran (Hamburg-Altstadt).1.11777.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 29-37 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Giebel.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Süd (Hamburg-Altstadt).03.29971.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dampfeisbrecher Stettin (Hamburg).3.14851.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alsterarkaden (Hamburg-Neustadt).29944.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerlöschboot Feuerwehr IV (Hamburg).crop..29049.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom (Lübeck-Altstadt).Türme.201.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and sharp all the way up --Daniel Case 03:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Repsoldstraße 45 (Hamburg-Hammerbrook).Turm.14134.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be better with more sky over the top. --XRay 13:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Behn-Brunnen (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).Okeanide (Giesecke).4.15289.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Behn-Brunnen (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).Okeanide (Giesecke).5.15289.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bei den Mühren 66 (Hamburg-Altstadt).1.11778.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bei den Mühren 66, 69 (Hamburg-Altstadt).1.11778.11779.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sprinkenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Eingang Burchardstraße 14.1.29135.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sprinkenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Eingang Burchardstraße 14.3.29135.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sprinkenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Portal Johanniswall 4.29135.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit sharper, but still a Quality Image. -- Ikan Kekek 06:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sprinkenhof (Hamburg-Altstadt).Südfassade.29135.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good idea, and the quality is quite adequate, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 06:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schule Löwenstraße (Hamburg-Hoheluft-Ost).Eingang.Löwenstraße.2.29252.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective, white parts are well done --Michielverbeek 06:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptfeuerwache Berliner Tor (Hamburg-St. Georg).Bei der Hauptfeuerwache 4.Eingang.1.29205.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kellinghusens Park (Hamburg-Eppendorf).Luchs (Bauer).1.29581.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsichtbrücke (Hamburg-Winterhude).Seite Außenalster.1.28987.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kieler Straße 69 (Hamburg-Altona-Nord).Eingang.Figuren.3b.15368.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kieler Straße 72 (Hamburg-Altona-Nord).Fassadendetail.15336.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kieler Straße 74 (Hamburg-Altona-Nord).Fassadendetail.16202.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 29 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Giebel.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 33 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Giebel.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 35 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Giebel.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS 'Bleichen' (Hamburg-Kleiner Grasbrook).Detail.14876.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hubbrücke (Magdeburg).Mittelteil.Blick nach Westen.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition --Michielverbeek 19:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwebefähre Osten.4.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The top crop is very tight - I'll give it a weak support vote. --Peulle 19:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleibrücke Lindaunis.Blick vom Schneiderhaken.Brückenöffnung.4.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindenallee (Jersbek).1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schule Scheplerstraße (Hamburg-Altona-Altstadt).3.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albinmüller-Turm (Magdeburg-Werder).Detail.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is a little questionable. I'd feel more comfortable if you'd sharpen it a bit before I promote. -- Ikan Kekek 09:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @Ikan Kekek: Thank you for review - sharpness parameter in LR increased. --Ajepbah 15:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Better, thank you, and good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 22:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom (Magdeburg-Altstadt).Ansicht Neue Strombrücke.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo. Good combination of the cathedral and its environment --Michielverbeek 08:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg (Nürnberg-St. Sebald).Kaiserburg.Heidenturm.fw13.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 08:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brahmskontor (Hamburg-Neustadt).Johannes-Brahms-Platz 1.Treppenhaus.6.29190.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I like the composition, but IMO it's not sharp enough. --XRay 06:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)  Done @XRay: Thank you for review, new (hopefully enough) sharpened version. --Ajepbah 18:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)  Support I think it's OK. Thank you. --XRay 06:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.10.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 07:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.Baggård.3.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.Gavl.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.Tårn nordfløj.2.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 31 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Giebel.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wahmstraße 37 (Lübeck-Altstadt).Giebel.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.06.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.Port.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Østlige orangeri.1.707-112730-2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Portbygning.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm quite bothered by the unsharp foreground, but that's not the subject, and the rest of the picture is very sharp. Ergo, quality image. -- Ikan Kekek 08:44, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.01.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Gård.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Forpagterbolig.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Orangerier.3.707-112730-2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective, quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 07:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.Ur.1.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, and good enough quality for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.Skilt.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.Tårn sydfløj.Vindfløj.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.Tårne.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.11.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Hovedbygning.04.707-112730-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Østlige orangeri.Facade.707-112730-2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Portbygning.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tustrup gravpladsen (Norddjurs Kommune).1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 15:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tustrup gravpladsen (Norddjurs Kommune).Fritstående dyssekammer.3.47887.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 15:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tustrup gravpladsen (Norddjurs Kommune).Runddysse.05.47885.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Small focus problem and sky noise, however, good quality --The Photographer 15:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tustrup gravpladsen (Norddjurs Kommune).7.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Amazing and lovely, nice quality --The Photographer 15:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auning Kirke (Norddjurs Kommune).5.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The white looks almost blown, but the detail really is there so good quality. --W.carter 21:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auning Kirke (Norddjurs Kommune).2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auning (Norddjurs Kommune).Hospital.1.707-113350-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auning (Norddjurs Kommune).Hospital.2.707-113350-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Løvenholm Herregård (Norddjurs Kommune).3.707-112111-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Løvenholm Herregård (Norddjurs Kommune).Hjørnetårn.707-112111-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Løvenholm Herregård (Norddjurs Kommune).2.707-112111-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Løvenholm Herregård (Norddjurs Kommune).Østfløj.3.707-112111-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Løvenholm Herregård (Norddjurs Kommune).Østfløj.1.707-112111-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe someone else will determine that some small areas are blown, but to me, it's good quality and a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 13:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Løvenholm Herregård (Norddjurs Kommune).Sydfløj.2.707-112111-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The one possible problem I see is what is either a hole or a dust spot in a cloud, but I'm not sure which. Have a look, but I went ahead and promoted this, regardless. -- Ikan Kekek 13:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)  Done @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for review - dust spots removed --Ajepbah 19:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auning Kirke (Norddjurs Kommune).Ur.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mejlgård (Norddjurs Kommune).3.707-100368-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 06:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mejlgård (Norddjurs Kommune).Gavl.707-100368-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mejlgård (Norddjurs Kommune).Portbygning.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Nikhilb239 06:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mejlgård (Norddjurs Kommune).Tårn.2.707-100368-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Nikhilb239 06:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Løvenholm Herregård (Norddjurs Kommune).Sydfløj.1.707-112111-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Highlights are blown; please fix that. Otherwise, I would have to decline the nomination, which would be a pity. -- Ikan Kekek 13:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)  Done @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for review - highlights reduced --Ajepbah 19:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC) That's a big improvement. The flowers are still very bright, but it was obviously a very sunny day. I consider this a QI now. -- Ikan Kekek 14:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mejlgård (Norddjurs Kommune).7.707-100368-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mejlgård (Norddjurs Kommune).5.707-100368-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mejlgård (Norddjurs Kommune).4.707-100368-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe it's better whole little darker, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 06:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mejlgård (Norddjurs Kommune).2.707-100368-1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bønnerup (Norddjurs Kommune).Havn.1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:23, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bønnerup (Norddjurs Kommune).Havn.3.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bønnerup (Norddjurs Kommune).Havn.4.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo, I like the blue colour of this pic --Michielverbeek 06:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bønnerup (Norddjurs Kommune).Havn.5.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bønnerup (Norddjurs Kommune).Havn.7.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bønnerup (Norddjurs Kommune).Havn.9.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glesborg Kirke (Norddjurs Kommune).1.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glesborg Kirke (Norddjurs Kommune).Tårn.2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balle (Syddjurs Kommune).Kalkovne på Rugårdsvej.01.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balle (Syddjurs Kommune).Kalkovne på Rugårdsvej.08.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balle (Syddjurs Kommune).Kalkovne på Rugårdsvej.05.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balle (Syddjurs Kommune).Kalkovne på Rugårdsvej.06.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Standort Fraenkelstraße der Stadtteilschule Barmbek

Moin Ajepbah,

Du hast als Oberkategorie Category:Built in Hamburg in 1931 eingefügt. Laut der dortigen Geschichtstafel wurde das Gebäude aber 1929/30 errichtet. Hast Du eine Qelle, dass das Gebude tatsächlich erst 1931 fertiggestellt wurde (eröffnet wrde die Schule meines Wissens tatsächlich erst zum Schuljahresbeginn Ostern 1931). --Mogelzahn (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Mogelzahn,

ich habe die Jahreszahl aus dem Werkverzeichnis von Maike Bruhns: Bauschmuck bei Fritz Schumacher: ein Kaleidoskop der Künste. Auf S. 701 steht als Auftraggeber FHH 1929-1931. Dies bezieht sich dann wohl nicht unbedingt auf die Bauzeit, Teile das Bauschmiucks datieren von 1931 (z. B. Knabe auf Schildkröte und die Wandbilder). Im Werkverzeichnis des Katalogs Hartmut Frank (Hrsg.): Fritz Schumacher, Reformkultur und Moderne findet sich auf S. 292: Auftraggeber Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg 1929-30. Alles in allem wohl etwas unklar - zumal, wenn man sich für eine Jahreszahl entscheiden soll/muss ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 20:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Und was machen wir nun damit? --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Wenn man "Built in" auf die Fertigstellung des Gebäudes bezieht passt wohl 1930 besser als 1931. Insofern wäre ich für Umkategorisierung ... --Ajepbah (talk) 20:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Forsvarstårn.6.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Forsvarstårn.Mursten.3.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Forsvarstårn.7.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Bro og forsvarstårn.2.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Forsvarstårn.Mursten.1.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Forsvarstårn.Mursten.4.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

WLM 2016

Moin! Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur Platzierung unter dem Top 58 bei Wiki Loves Monuments! --XRay ^talk 07:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis - in die Broschüre der Jury hatte ich noch gar nicht geschaut. Viele Grüße --Ajepbah (talk) 07:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Forsvarstårn.5.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It might have made the picture more expressive little more contrast, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Forsvarstårn.Mursten.5.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Vejdæmning.Blik mod øen.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent composition, maybe for FP? Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammel Estrup (Norddjurs Kommune).Orangerier.7.707-112730-2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:22, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glesborg Kirke (Norddjurs Kommune).2.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The right is leaning in, otherwise good. --Palauenc05 07:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)  Done @Palauenc05: Thanks for review - perspective corrected --Ajepbah 21:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC) GQ --Palauenc05 22:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Forsvarstårn.4.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Mindesten for C. M. Smidt.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Vejdæmning.Blik fra forsvarstårn.1.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The wall on the right ride is very bright, think you could tone that down a bit? W.carter 12:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)  Done @W.carter: Thanks fore review, wall toned down --Ajepbah 16:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC) Very nice. Good quality. --W.carter 19:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalø Slotsruin (Syddjurs Kommune).Mur.3.125359.ajb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same problem here, some details are very glary, if you could just tone them down a bit that would be better. W.carter 12:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)  Done @W.carter: Thanks fore review, I have reduced the lights --Ajepbah 16:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC) Very nice. Good quality. --W.carter 19:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)