Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, AlexLeeCN!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Shixia School Building index.jpg

edit
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Shixia School Building index.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Guangzhou Grandview Huanshi Center.jpeg

edit
 
File:Guangzhou Grandview Huanshi Center.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LumHoTsing (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

About the comic What if Steam is blocked

edit

I have contacted the author, and he has published the comic on pixiv.net with description containg declaration of licensing by CC-BY 4.0. I have also changed the source to the pixiv link. You may know this and remove the missing permission template. --CCPSupporter (talk) 14:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

On https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:What_if_Steam_is_blocked_1.png ,https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:What_if_Steam_is_blocked_2.png ,https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:What_if_Steam_is_blocked_3.png and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:What_if_Steam_is_blocked_all.png .--CCPSupporter (talk) 14:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
@CCPSupporter:   Re-checked. Regards.--AlexLeeCN (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

已更新「心火不熄,創作不死!」作者資訊

edit

已經更新了文件File:心火不熄,創作不死!.jpg的來源信息,並提供了更加具體的來源說明。這些圖片來自公共領域,在抗議中被廣泛使用,請重新審查該文件並考慮移除No source since模板。謝謝! 古拉不是德古拉 (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

無法更新「創作不死」 「227事件」 作者資訊

edit

上述圖片為很久以前的抗議資訊,已難以查證具體來源,但可以確信它們在抗議活動中被使用和傳播,請重新審查該文件並考慮移除No source since模板。謝謝!古拉不是德古拉 (talk) 19:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

關於侵害著作權的指控

edit

All the images you propose to delete have significant historical and educational value. These images meticulously document the context and circumstances of specific protest activities, making them crucial for studying and understanding the events.

These images have been widely used in protest activities, becoming important materials for the event and playing a vital role in the dissemination of public knowledge.

Due to their unique documentation of the real scenes of specific protest activities, the content of these images cannot be replaced by others.

Using these images will not negatively impact the economic interests of the original authors, as they come from the public domain, and the authors have strongly implied their desire for these contents to be widely disseminated for non-commercial purposes.

Therefore, these images comply with the principles of fair use and should not be deleted.I did not infringe any copyrights either.古拉不是德古拉 (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

關於三份連署書的著作權問題

edit

這是三份公開抗議連署書,根據台灣法律完全不會有任何版權疑慮,任何人都可以自由使用 古拉不是德古拉 (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply