Bdamokos
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image Tagging Image:Bendera nsembilan.png
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Bendera nsembilan.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 03:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Bendera nsembilan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Hello Bdamokos, you asked why {{Hu}} does not work in Category:Migmatite and Category:Staurolite. It was not working because in the text was a equal sign (=), and this is not allowed in the internationalization templates. I've changed the equal sign to ->. --GeorgHH 13:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
FlickrLickr account
editHello Bdamokos,
a while ago you requested a FlickrLickr account. Please e-mail me at Eloquence AT gmail DOT com so that I can send you your account information (username and password). The Wikimedia e-mail feature is notoriously unreliable.--Eloquence 14:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Vaiaku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Image deletion warning | Image:Kép-Mestersegek_unnepe_2004,nemezek_001.jpgKép-Mestersegek_unnepe_2004,nemezek_001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Re: Képek a huwikiről
editszia! oké, majd igyekszem. legtöbbször saját fotókat töltök fel, átvenni csak ritkán szoktam a wikikből. Alensha 00:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
bot
editIt reads description of images at articles in Wikipedia, and it copies the text. That's all. I have thought to run the bot for others languages very soon. --Emijrp 22:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
The welcome bot
editThere was a period where it wasn't operating, so people who registered during that time didn't get a welcome message, but it has started up again. You can still put a manual welcome if you beat the bot. :) If I use the no-source script, I edit their page again and put a welcome message as well. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Review a change
editHello. Could you please review this change it seems to be Hungarian and I feel that it's nothing ontopic. At least it's at the wrong position (bottom). Thanks. --87.230.112.222 20:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
It was anote stating that he is the creator of the image. I am reverting it, as he was anonymous, but I don't know.. It seems unlikely that he was the creator of the said image, so I left him a note asking him to log in, so we could communicate with him. Regards, --Bdamokos 20:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Vaitupu.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Vaitupu.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 15:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Re: CommonsDelinker
editShould be fixed in the latest version. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Also fixed in latest svn :) -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- And fixed again :) Feel free to ask me if anymore problems occur; I'm happy to fix them. -- Bryan (talk to me) 15:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Aix_galericulata_Hannover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Image
editAbove image is included under the Military of Sweden category... how does the picture realte to Sweden? Regards --Malin Tokyo (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 2ca60708b2fdc9818a9af0bd600184ed
editI am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Image deletion warning | Image:Népszava_cover_of_1956_nov_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 14:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Népszabadság_cover_of_3_nov_1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Magyar_Nemzet_cover_of_3_nov_1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Magyar-Nemzet-1956nov3-csapatmozd-x.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:23, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Magyar_Függetlenség_cover_of_3_nov_1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Magyar_Függetlenség_cover_of_2_nov_1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Magyar_Világ_cover_of_2_nov_1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Népszava_cover_31_Oct_1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Nepszava-1956nov3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
File tagging File:Opera_interior_budapest.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Opera_interior_budapest.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Opera_interior_budapest.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Hotcat
editA hotcat nem alkalmas sablonok kategorizálására, mert használ noinclude-ot. Lásd pl. [1]. --Tgr (talk) 09:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:SAAF_flag.png
editThis media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SAAF_flag.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:SAAF_flag.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- I checked the original image at en.wikipedia, it had no original source and was just tagged with a deprecated template. The reason you are notified about this image is that you uploaded it here. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 17:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking, next time maybe notify the original uploader at enwiki, he might have some idea. (Also considering that the svg version is PD, the .png version would have the same status if we discount sweat of the brow, which as I know, we usually do.) --Dami (talk) 18:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
editHello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
International Photoworkshop
editHello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010.--Prolineserver (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Új szócikk létrehozása 2.theora.ogv was uncategorized on 26 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
The graph file
editThank you very much! Steven Walling at work 22:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Out of the goodness of your heart...
edit...can you take 5 minutes and help with this maybe? :D -- notafish }<';> 22:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
File:LiggingTepuka.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:Felt Pethő Rózsa.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Felt Pethő Rózsa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Felt Pethő Rózsa.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File:Nuclear Power Plant 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |