User talk:Carlos yo/Archive 10

Archive 5 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia del Niño Jesús de Praga, Santiago 20200209 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cuartel Borgoño, Santiago 20200209 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de los Dolores, Viña del Mar 20210725 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:46, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gimnasio Municipal de La Cruz 20210819 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Just ok in terms of sharpness --Poco a poco 08:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Túnel San Pedro 20201105 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odeón, Quillota 20210822 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Árbol caído, Quillota 20210822 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, interesting sculpture. -- Ikan Kekek 02:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gobernación Provincial, Quillota 20210822 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Jesucristo de los SUD, Quillota 20210822 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Quillota 20210822 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital Biprovincial Quillota Petorca, Quillota 20210822 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Santa Lucía, Santiago 20210905 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Instituto de Neurocirugía Dr. Alfonso Asenjo, Providencia, Santiago 20210905 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Instituto Oncológico de la Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Providencia, Santiago 20210905 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Busto de Arturo Prat, Plaza Juan XXIII, Providencia, Santiago 20210905 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 03:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Germain Autos, Providencia, Santiago 20210905 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Tajamar, Providencia, Santiago 20210905 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres Carlos Antúnez, Providencia, Santiago 20210905 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Carozzi, Quilpué 20210917 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support A bit of unsharpness on the left but OK IMO. --King of Hearts 01:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación Quilpué, Quilpué 20210923 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 01:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación Quilpué, Quilpué 20210923 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Escudo de la ruta 60 ch en la cruz

Hola buenas tardes Carlos Figueroa necesito el escudo de la ruta 60 ch en la cruz a la altura salida pocochay la cruz de autopista Los Andes por favor la foto 190.8.107.157 19:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Celeste Hostal, Cerro Alegre, Valparaíso 20201102 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de San Enrique con Templeman, Cerro Alegre, Valparaíso 20201102 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio del Ministerio de las Culturas, las Artes y el Patrimonio, Valparaíso 20201102 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio de la Gobernación Regional, Valparaíso 20201102 158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
QI if you remove the dust spot in the top right corner --Poco a poco 16:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
  Done Carlos yo 15:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Municipal de Las Condes, Santiago 20220619 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preuniversitario Pedro de Valdivia, Santiago 20220621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave, Santiago 20220619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Matriz Küpfer Hermanos, Santiago 20220621 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:01, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio de la Sociedad Nacional de Agricultura, Santiago 20220619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura Parque Inés de Suárez, Providencia, Santiago 20220618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ministerio de Bienes Nacionales, Santiago 20220618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa Estadio Escuela de Carabineros, Providencia, Santiago 20220618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan Evangelista, Santiago 20220619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fundación CLEC, Oficina Regional para América Latina y el Caribe, Santiago 20220621 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de la Real Audiencia, Santiago 20220619 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua Sucre, Ñuñoa, Santiago 20220618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Núñez Casanovas, Santiago 20220625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 22:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Aldunate, Santiago 20220625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 22:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a José Miguel Infante, Santiago 20220625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 22:15, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caracol Ñuñoa Centro, Ñuñoa, Santiago 20220618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 07:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo de la Iglesia Universal del Reino de Dios, Santiago 20220619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality --Domob 15:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Denuncia

Disculpa ¿Por qué has denunciado mis fotografías? No pertenecen al portal prensa fútbol, has hecho tal denuncia y son fotografías propias editadas porque son de partidos pero son propias, incluso puedes ver las originales en nuestro portal eseaene.cl.

Saludos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javier Fake (talk • contribs) 17:09, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Consulta

Hola Carlos, ¿como andas? He visto que eres tú quién crea las indumentarias del fútbol chileno. Me gustaría saber como las desarrollas y de esa forma ayudarte en ese ítem. De antemano muchas gracias. Saludos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Losdelcerroadicto (talk • contribs) 22:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Disculpas por la Foto

Hola, pido disculpas por la foto subida. Estoy buscando la manera de borrarla sino que la borre directamente Wikipedia. Si usted es el autor de la misma le solicito suba alguna usted, solo para la completar mas o menos la info de Pablo.

Saludos y gracias — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arizonateamo (talk • contribs) 15:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Creación de equipaciones

Hola Carlos, He visto que eres tú quién crea las indumentarias del fútbol chileno. Me gustaría saber como las desarrollas. Saludos

File:Escudo no oficial de La Estrella.svg

 
File:Escudo no oficial de La Estrella.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bedivere (talk) 02:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Kiosko Valparaíso 20200207 23.jpg

 
File:Kiosko Valparaíso 20200207 23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Эlcobbola talk 19:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Bus tmv

Publicar el bus TMV línea 216 200.124.48.199 18:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fundo Lo Venecia, Quillota 20220621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campo de Prisioneros Melinka, Puchuncaví 20220621 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Íñiguez, Santiago 20220625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 17:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Ochagavía, Santiago 20220625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Tucapel Jiménez, Santiago 20220625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua de José Gervasio Artigas, Santiago 20220625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio de la Bolsa de Comercio, Santiago 20220625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Hotel Dresden, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casona Puyó, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Gratitud Nacional, Santiago 20220626 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Lord Cochrane, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Dmartin969 19:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Corporativo de Metro de Santiago 20220625 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. -- 21:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de los Sagrados Corazones, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Eguiguren Yrarrázaval, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Ignacio, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Morandé Campino, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Dieciocho 109, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Edwards Hurtado, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Piwonka, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Nuestra Señora del Perpetuo Socorro, Santiago 20230312 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Nuestra Señora del Perpetuo Socorro, Santiago 20230312 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support The left crop could have been better, I believe, but still QI to me --Poco a poco 13:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Entel, Santiago 20230312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a los Héroes de Iquique, Santiago 20230312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:50, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Alessandri Besa, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Hindustán, Santiago 20220626 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio de Avenida España 503, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia del Monasterio de la Santísima Trinidad, Santiago 20220529 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Pilar, Santiago 20220529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa Encuentro Continental de Jóvenes, Los Andes 20211009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colegio Hispano Americano, Santiago 20220529 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Smith Miller, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 23:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca de la Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Independencia, Santiago 20220529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cité Capitol, Independencia, Santiago 20220529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:45, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Bicentenario, Vitacura, Santiago 20200314 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Simón Bolívar, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La búsqueda, Parque Bicentenario, Vitacura, Santiago 20200314 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Bicentenario, Vitacura, Santiago 20200314 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 01:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cine Teatro Municipal, Llay-Llay 20211009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 05:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Cámara Chilena de la Construcción, Las Condes, Santiago 20220417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque nativo, Parque Bicentenario, Vitacura, Santiago 20200314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Percepción, Parque Bicentenario, Vitacura, Santiago 20200314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua de Arturo Prat, Parque Bicentenario, Vitacura, Santiago 20200314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Vidaurre 1647, Santiago 20220626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ex Central de Leche, Santiago 20230312 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volare, Parque Bicentenario, Vitacura, Santiago 20200314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Génesis, Las Condes, Santiago 20220417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rampa de las Flores, Las Condes, Santiago 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WeWork Apoquindo 5950, Las Condes, Santiago 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 22:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadio Italiano, Las Condes, Santiago 20211024 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La búsqueda, Parque Bicentenario, Vitacura, Santiago 20200314 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estadio Municipal Nicolás Chahuán Nazar, La Calera 20220319 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 16:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estadio Municipal Nicolás Chahuán Nazar, La Calera 20220319 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neptuno y Anfitrite, Santiago 20220627 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Escudo no oficial de La Estrella.svg

 
File:Escudo no oficial de La Estrella.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 15:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Picaresque, Recoleta, Santiago 20230324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Detail level is just over the bar --Poco a poco 21:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant Carmencita, Recoleta, Santiago 20230324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cementerio Católico, Recoleta, Santiago 20230324 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facultad de Gobierno Universidad de Chile, Santiago 20230417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Maybe a bit more brightness would do the image good? --Vasmar1 17:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for the review. --Carlos yo 21:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 05:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmacia La Botica Cubana, Recoleta, Santiago 20230324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escuela Básica Arturo Alessandri Palma, Estación Central, Santiago 20230327 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio CorpGroup, Las Condes, Santiago 20230326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Brasil, Las Condes, Santiago 20230326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospital de Niños Roberto del Río, Independencia, Santiago 20230326 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please, export it again with more resolution, this version only has 0,4 MPx --Poco a poco 06:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for the review. --Carlos yo 12:51, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Nueva Las Condes, Las Condes, Santiago 20230326 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio IBM, Providencia, Santiago 20230305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Nueva Santa María, Providencia, Santiago 20230323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me. An English description would be fine. --Milseburg 14:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio de República 517, Santiago 20220626 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Bus TMV viña jpg

Bus del recorrido 210 del transporte metropolitano de Valparaíso en viña del mar Nico12456 (talk) 16:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Kit body kor06.png

 
File:Kit body kor06.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Methewle (talk) 11:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Kit body kor06.png

 
File:Kit body kor06.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Methewle (talk) 15:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Consulta

Buenos días. Quisiera consultarle sobre la imagen del Huachipato 1967, File:Huachipato_1967,_Revista_Estadio,_Chile.jpg, que recientemente ha sido marcada como posible infracción de copyright. Dado que es speedy deletion, no tengo apelación por el momento, así que, de momento, prefiero consultarle directamente por esta página. La imagen que subí es la misma imagen disponible en [1], página 312 del PDF, disponible en el sitio web Memoria Chilena, de las ediciones 1261 y 1662 de la Revista Estadio, año 1967, digitalizadas por el sitio web memoriachilena.gov, a mi entender, en dominio público al ser libremente publicada en línea por un sitio gubernamental.

Tengo entendido que la imagen, que no cita más autor que la misma revista Estadio, cuya fecha de publicación, de 1967, en base a lo dicho en la ley vigente a la creación de la época (Ley 9549, hoy derogada. La ley número 17.336, del año 1970, ley que la reemplazó, da plazo de protección de 30 años después de la muerte del autor, pero no es retroactiva), tenía una protección de la vida de autor y de 50 años a la muerte del autor, plazo ya cumplido (2017), por lo que estaría libre de dicha protección al encontrarse cumplido el plazo de la ley.

File:Clásico 1959.jpg Esta imagen tiene la misma procedencia, del sitio web memoriachilena y la Revista Estadio en su versión digitalizada, siendo aceptada. En base al criterio usada esa imagen subida a Commons y a los argumentos que anteriormente expuse, pido reconsiderar la petición de borrado. ¡Saludos y tenga un excelente día! Ardije (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, IagoQnsi (talk) 01:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Obertura Teletón 2023 38.jpg

 
File:Obertura Teletón 2023 38.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateus2019 (talk) 08:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Renombrar el nombre de fichero

Hola, Carlos:

Cuando puedas, por favor, hay que modificar el nombre de fichero en el Wikimedia Commons que le puse el aviso para suprimir una parte final del nombre de fichero (numero "2" y los "()"), por lo que había subido el fichero de que la imagen esta bien editada por el otro usuario, pero había un antiguo fichero (era lo que edité y subí yo) que lo ha suprimido por decisión propia, con el motivo de la mala edición de imagen (tiene que ser mas grande de lo normal, aunque me di cuenta que fue mi error). En cuando tengas el hueco libre para echar un vistazo, la dirección del fichero para modificar es el siguiente: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logotipo_del_Ministerio_de_Transportes_y_Movilidad_Sostenible_(2).svg

Muchas gracias por corregir y un saludo. Autopistero20502020 (talk) 22:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Ruta 5 los vilos

Ruta 5 pasada por los vilos con el letrero la serena y los vilos concesion autopista del Aconcagua 190.153.194.119 13:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Edificio central Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, Valparaíso 20200207 42.jpg es en Category:Government buildings in Chile, pero ¿es parte del gobierno? es:Instituto de Fomento Pesquero dice que es "una corporación de derecho privado sin fines de lucro y con un rol público". - Jmabel ! talk 21:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Por favor, ¿puede Vd. responder? - Jmabel ! talk 08:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Hi Carlos yo. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: omitting the subpage, transclusion, year, month, day, and notice to the page creator. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." The subject Daniela Ceballos is an active player, has two Wikipedia biographies, and has a Wikidata item. It is likely that a free photo of her will emerge from her activity in front of crowds during her play for Deportes Antofagasta.[1]   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

References

No picture, no category IMHO. --Carlos yo (Discusión) 13:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Bruno Iacoponi, Estadio, 1946-11-16 (183).jpg

 
File:Bruno Iacoponi, Estadio, 1946-11-16 (183).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 03:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Carlos yo/Archive 10".