Ciaran.london

Copyright status: File:Theresa May official portrait.jpg

Copyright status: File:Theresa May official portrait.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Theresa May official portrait.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell.jpg

Copyright status: File:Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Donald Dewar Cabinet.jpg

Copyright status: File:Donald Dewar Cabinet.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Donald Dewar Cabinet.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Marsha de Cordova full size Official Parliamentary Photo.jpg

Copyright status: File:Marsha de Cordova full size Official Parliamentary Photo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marsha de Cordova full size Official Parliamentary Photo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Official portrait of Karen Bradley crop 2.jpg

Copyright status: File:Official portrait of Karen Bradley crop 2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Official portrait of Karen Bradley crop 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:06, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Stop removing the new user page uploads by yourself

It's there for a reason, for review by others. Praxidicae (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

I don’t want my picture to be on this. Stop adding it without my permission . Ciaran.london (talk) 10:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is abusing multiple accounts (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Should you wish to return to editing, keep it to one account.--Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "I would like to be unblocked - I didn’t know that having multiple accounts was against Wiki rules. And if I’m unblocked, I would only operate from this account and make constructive edits. Ciaran.london (talk) 14:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)" Decline reason: "You are not blocked for having multiple accounts ("I didn’t know that having multiple accounts was against Wiki rules"), but rather for "abusing multiple accounts"--a rather important distinction. As of the creation of Politicsnerd123, 28 December 2020, you had received numerous notifications related to inappropriate or unacceptable copyright information. Politicsnerd123's very first upload was another image with such an issue. This is considered an abusive use of multiple accounts; the second account continues disruptive editing (copyvios) with a "clean slate" and thus inherently avoids the scrutiny and increased expectations of a highly-notified master. COM:BP requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Neither are on offer here and, indeed, the true underlying abuse (copyright issues) is not addressed. Notions of unfairness because of lack of knowledge are nonsense per the aforementioned notifications, the guidance of the UploadWizard (used by the user), basic reading comprehension, and ignorantia juris non excusat. (Verily, you are not being punished, but rather prevented from continuing the disruption resulting from a demonstrated failure to understand issues.) Эlcobbola talk 19:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

Comment The block is meant to be a preventative measure to stop the abuse of multiple accounts (in this case).

• How do we know that you won't do it again?
• The reason we blocked you for a month is to let you have time to consider your actions - why should we reduce this duration? Gbawden (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

• I won’t do it again. I am going to make myself Crystal clear: I would like to be unblocked as I didn’t know that having multiple accounts was against Wiki rules. I will only operate from this account and make constructive edits.

• I don’t think it’s fair for me to be blocked as I didn’t have knowledge of the polices in place on having for having multiple accounts. Ciaran.london (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jon Kolbert: pinging as a courtesy Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Must've missed the notification! My apologies. Any admin can feel to reverse/review the block should they see fit. It was only a temporary block, much unlike the indef they got on enwiki. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Nicola Sturgeon in 2017.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Nicola Sturgeon in 2017.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 01:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

File:First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon, US President Joe Biden and President of Malawi Lazarus Chakwera.jpg

File:First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon, US President Joe Biden and President of Malawi Lazarus Chakwera.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

219.78.190.155 02:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)