Dabbelju

Danke für die Korrekturen bei den Kategorien bei vielen Bildern von mir!--<span style="background:#CCFFFF;color:#0099FF;">&copy;WinG</span> 15:28, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Interwikilink

Hi, das Entfernen des Interwiki-Links war sicher nur ein Versehen. Bitte sei in Zukunft etwas vorsichtiger. -- Danke & Gruß, aka 23:16, 2 December 2005 (UTC)--Dabbelju 12:59, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, in diesem Fall war es beabsichtigt, weil ich einen Link an dieser Stelle nicht verstehe. Warum sollte ein Interwiki-Link zur gleichnamigen Bildbeschreibungsseite auf de.wp führen, die darüberhinaus auch noch direkt aus Commons eingebunden wird? Grüße --Dabbelju 23:23, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Wenn du etwas nicht verstehst, dann informiere dich, aber entferne es nicht einfach! Der Link zeigt auf die deutsche Bildbeschreibungsseite. Die Commons-Beschreibung ist in der deutschsprachigen WP sichtbar, nicht jedoch umgekehrt. -- Gruß, aka 23:29, 2 December 2005 (UTC) - PS: Ich glaube, du bist dem Link, den du entfernt hast, gar nicht gefolgt und hast deshalb den Sinn nicht verstanden. Vielleicht möchtest du es ja nachholen, ich habe sie natürlich bei beiden betroffenen Bildern wieder eingefügt. Und nochmal die Bitte: lasse Vorsicht walten. Insbesondere dann, wenn du etwas nicht verstehst. -- Gruß, aka 23:36, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Natürlich bin ich dem Link gefolgt, da ich interwiki-Links bei Bildern in commons bislang noch nicht gesehen habe. Ehrlich gesagt nur bei dir, und ich habe schon einiges an Bildern und Bild-Seiten hier gesehen und entsprechend auch bearbeitet. Ich bin eben schon der Meinung, über die interwiki-Verlinkung bescheid zu wissen. Eine solche Regelung, neben Artikeln auch Bilder per interwiki-Link zu verlinken, (insbesondere auch dann wenn es ein Commons-Bild ist) ist mir nicht bekannt und habe ich auch nicht hier gefunden. Ich lasse mir gerne entsprechende Meinungsbilder oder Regelungen zeigen und mich eines besseren belehren. Natürlich ist mir bewusst, dass in den Sprachwikis unten die Nutzung der Bilder im lokalen Wikipedia aufgelistet ist und in Commons wiederum ebenfalls nur die lokale Verwendung. Aber ich hatte darin bislang eher einen administrativen Nutzen denn einen für den Nutzer gesehen. Grüße --Dabbelju 23:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, es braucht doch keine offizielle Regelung oder ein Meinungsbild, um so einen Link setzen zu dürfen. Interwikilinks sind ein ganz normales Werkzeug. Es geht dabei auch gar nicht um die Verwendung des Bildes in Artikeln, sondern einfach um die Tatsache, dass es neben der englischen noch eine (und manchmal mehrere) Bildbeschreibungsseiten in anderen Sprachen gibt. -- Gruß, aka 06:19, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, sicherlich darfst Du auch ohne Regelung den Link setzen :). Ich wünschte allerdings, diesbezüglich gäbe es eine konsequentere Umsetzung in Commons und nicht einzelne und unterschiedliche Umsetzungen. Das macht das Arbeiten mit WP & Co. durch außenstehende vorallem lesende Nutzer sicherlich nicht einfacher. Klar, kann man auch die lokale Bild-Seite entsprechend bearbeiten und den z.B. deutschsprachigen Text dort hinschreiben. Ob diese Praxis nun besser ist anstelle Commons mehrsprachig auszubauen, wie es derzeit größtenteils geschieht, sei mal dahingestellt. Nun, ich lasse die interwiki-Links bei Bildern künftig (so ich denn mal auf einen bei Bildern treffen sollte :), auch wenn ich mir in punkto Nutzerfreundlichkeit eine einheitlichere Lösung wünschen würde. Wir können das damit jetzt auch belassen. Grüße --Dabbelju 12:59, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Bernau bei Berlin Pulverturm.jpg

hallo dabbelju, wenn du wieder mal mit der kamera in bernau unterwegs bist, könntest du dann nicht mal ein foto machen audem die spitze des pulverturmes drauf ist und man weniger von den auos sieht? vielleicht schaffe ich es ja auch vor dir... viele grüße --Sjoehest 12:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Sjoehest, jo kann ich machen. Könnte aber etwas länger dauern. Grüße --Dabbelju 03:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Harzquerbahn Eisenbahnunglueck 6 7 1927.jpg

BotMultichillT 20:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

NZ location maps mass deletion

Hi, the New Zealand location map File:NZ-Takaka.png that you uploaded has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests, the discussion is at Commons:Deletion_requests/2010/04/01#NZ_location_maps. Benchill (talk) 07:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:NZR DL class 9008 front profile.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NZR DL class 9008 front profile.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NZR DL class 9008 front profile.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 10:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:NZR DL class 9008 side profile.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NZR DL class 9008 side profile.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NZR DL class 9008 side profile.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 10:53, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:NZR EM class 2010 02 19.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NZR EM class 2010 02 19.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NZR EM class 2010 02 19.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 10:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Harzquerbahn Eisenbahnunglueck 6 7 1927.jpg

File:Harzquerbahn Eisenbahnunglueck 6 7 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rd232 (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete files after copying to Commons

I see that you have copied w:cy:Delwedd:Auckland (Beach Road).jpg to Commons. No problem; however, the image on cy-wiki now needs deleting. That would be courteous. You also renamed it File:Auckland Railway Station Beach Road.jpg and therefore the link from cy-wiki to the new file on Commons is broken. Please add the new name onto the Wikipedia article. John Jones (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi John Jones, as far as I can see, all links (one) in cy-wiki have been moved to the new name (see diff). Furthermore I put the template NowCommons to the picture description which marks it as duplicate in order to allow administrators to delete it. Can you please describe in detail what further action is necessary in that case? BR --Dabbelju (talk) 18:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

I think you're correct - the admins on the local WP should delete files, not you. Many thanks! John Jones (talk) 12:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Kamenz Population Statistics.svg

Möchtest du die Grafik noch aktualieren? -- Summer ... hier! (talk) 15:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

@Summer ... hier!: Die Datei ist aktualisiert. Allerdings fände ich eine integriertere Realisierung dieser Grafiken mittlerweile besser, wie bspw. durch de:Kategorie:Vorlage:Zeitleiste oder auch als Liniendiagramm de::Vorlage:Zeitleiste Bevölkerungsentwicklung in Frankreich/Colonzelle. Der Wartung der Daten ist dann eventuell einfacher und durch eine größere Anzahl an Benutzern möglich. Der Austausch zwischen den Sprachversionen wie bei Commons ist damit dann allerdings nicht mehr gegeben. Gruß --Dabbelju (talk) 20:46, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Ich hoffe du bist mit meiner Änderung zur x-Achse bei der Grafik einverstanden.

Beim „Standartisieren“ (im weitesten Sinne) schaun wir mal. --Summer ... hier! (talk) 21:12, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Deine Änderung finde ich gut. Gruß Dabbelju (talk) 10:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Baldwin Street Informationpanel.jpg

File:Baldwin Street Informationpanel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Flughafen Berlin Tempelhof terminal Festival of Lights 2011.jpg

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)