User talk:Der Wolf im Wald/2007-2009

English: Welcome to the Commons, Der Wolf im Wald!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 10:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Der Wolf im Wald!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Photo Equipment DWiW.jpg is uncategorized since 7 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 400D.jpg is uncategorized since 7 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Solarkraftwerk IRT.jpg is uncategorized since 12 July 2009.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silvester Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Mbz1 00:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kölner Dom abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nett, Atmosphäre kommt perfekt rüber --Mbdortmund 00:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Post Tower Bonn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great.--Mbz1 23:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baureihe 151 144-3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. Bit more margins need for far better composition --George Chernilevsky 08:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi e-tron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Berthold Werner 14:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

QI "flooding"

Hi there. I don't know if you have been said that already, but for your information, quoted from the QI guidelines: "Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is frowned upon." It would be nice to submit only a few images per day. Thanks in advance, --Eusebius (talk) 20:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but a I discovered QI a few days ago, so I submited all my best images. You can be sure that I will not submit some images in the next time ;) -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokusse violett.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canon EOS 400D.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I'm not a big fan of the frontal view without lens (at least as the single view of the machine), but it is the cleanest picture we have and it is very descriptive. --Eusebius (talk) 13:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altes Rathaus (Bonn).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 13:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Audi e-tron.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is the model different from this one, or is the car asymmetric? --Eusebius (talk) 14:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

it is the same car and nearly the same camera position, but the car is on a turning platform, so it is shown from all sides -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 14:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

You got me wrong: The car has this kind of air intake (behind the door) on the right flank, but not on the left flank? --Eusebius (talk) 14:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

the car has this air intake on both sides, but it can open and close it so that you can't see it: on my photo it is open and on the other one it is closed ;) -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

OK... I'm anything but a car specialist, I would have understood that more quickly on a jet picture (but the intakes shuts for different reasons I guess). Thanks for the info anyway. --Eusebius (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Römer (Frankfurt am Main).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I am ready to support it, but I suggest to internationalize the scope wording—e.g “Römer (Frankfurt am Main)”. --Myrabella (talk) 15:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Info scope changed from Frankfurter Römer to Römer (Frankfurt am Main) -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 16:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Request I must have been absent-minded because I forgot to ask you to geocode that image. So I do it now! --Myrabella (talk) 17:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Info geocode added ;) -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Quite OK to me now, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 21:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Es ist gut gemacht

Es sind die guten Nominierungen.

Sie können die Illustrationen mit den Belohnungen innerhalb der Galerie von solchen Zeichen bemerken:

Der gewöhnliche Umfang:

• = {{FP star}}
• = {{QI seal}}
• = {{VI seal}}

Anderer Umfang, zum Beispiel, 20 Punkte:

• = {{FP star|20}}
• = {{QI seal|20}}
• = {{VI seal|20}}

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis! Viele Grüße, -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 16:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS 400D.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would promote when in full resolution --Berthold Werner 09:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC) * Comment also over the the recommended resolution (2MP) -- Wolf im Wald 20:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC) But the guidelines also say that "images should not be downsampled". This argument is rarely used as it can be unfair to cheap camera owners, but here the downsampling is quite significant and the picture was taken with a good camera in a controlled environment. --Eusebius 20:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)  Support I agree with all comments above, but result is good for me --George Chernilevsky 06:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zug Langzeitbelichtung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and something different.--Mbz1 19:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nahverkehrszüge Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Aqwis 09:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DB 140 423-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Korall 17:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DB 185 001-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Korall 17:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reichstag Fernsehturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice composition --George Chernilevsky 10:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS 400D Rückseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Korall 17:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Regionalbahn 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Some kind of train category too? The image is good. --Korall 17:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)  Comment train category added ;) -- Der Wolf im Wald 19:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Thank you, I promote now.--Korall 17:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DB Class 151.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I like also File:DB 151 110-4.jpg since it has a nice perspective. However, this nominated one seems to be a way sharper. -- MattiPaavola (talk) 11:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 21:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skyline Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent IMO. Could benefit from a slightly tighter crop at the bottom. --Cayambe 15:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenzollernbrücke Kölner Dom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would promote this, but I only comment because this would be my first promotion and I'd like someone else more experienced to comment it too.Fale 17:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)  Support I'm a newbie as well, but this looks exclent to me too. --MattiPaavola 23:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markthalle Stuttgart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Krokusse violett.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Krokusse violett.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skyline Frankfurt am Main.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect Archaeodontosaurus 18:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandenburger Tor abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Resolution seems to be high enough. -- Nicolas17 19:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skyline Frankfurt Flößerbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Pudelek 21:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Babenhäuser Landstraße in Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 11:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz IAA 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great mood. --Cayambe 08:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IAA Frankfurt 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weihnachtsbaum Römerberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Is this tinted towards green? Location-tag? Would maybe benefit from perspective correction? --MattiPaavola 00:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Location-tag added, I think the colors are realistic, because of the green tree which reflects the light. A perspective correction is IMO not necessary, because after it will look unnatural -- Der Wolf im Wald 12:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)  Support Thanks for the location tag. I can live with the colors now after the explanation. :-) --MattiPaavola 13:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trains of Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question In what way does this particular picture represent German trains better than other pictures? Wolf (talk) 20:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

There is no other picture which shows more than one German train in such a quality. Besides the locomotives on this picture are very typical for German passenger train service and the photo is taken on the area of the most important German railway hub ([1]). -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 20:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

 Support There is an exhaustive amount pf pictures of German trains. I found this as the closest competitor: File:Würzburg Hauptbahnhof ICE-Begegnung 0524.JPG. It shows multiple types including an ICE. However, I personally slightly prefer the nominated one.

•  Request @ the previous reviewer: please sign your vote :-) --Myrabella (talk) 20:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Oops, it was me. --MattiPaavola (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hintersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments astonishing - - Archaeodontosaurus 16:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frankfurt am Main.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think the scope should simply be Frankfurt am Main. After a quick exploration it seems to be the best pic for this scope as well. --Eusebius (talk) 13:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I have changed the scope from "Skylines in Frankfurt" into "Frankfurt am Main" -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 15:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support I think it is the best picture we have for this scope. --Eusebius (talk) 15:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment For this town, I imagine it would be appropriate to have an image showing the Main River if possible (I noticed 1 or 2, for instance, but better examples may exist)? --Myrabella (talk) 14:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
    • In my opinion, the second image you point out fails to show the city centre. The first one is taken from a skyscraper in the city centre, thus giving only a partial vue of it. It's a multi-criteria optimization problem now: is it more relevant to show a full view of the visually prominent skyscraper zone of the city or to show the river? Feel free to set up an MVR if you deem it necessary. --Eusebius (talk) 06:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

• You have brought out the issue very clearly. I tend to incline towards the second option: an image showing the river (it is Frankfurt am Main, after all :-), some "old" buildings (the town has a long history) and an evocation of "Mainhattan" (even only partially) could well epitomize the scope too. What would you think of File:Skyline Frankfurt.jpg, by Der Wolf im Wald too? --Myrabella (talk) 11:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

It sure is interesting. --Eusebius (talk) 12:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

• => Moved to MVR. --Myrabella (talk) 15:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment I remove my support, I need to think about the MVR. The image notes on this picture sure add value. --Eusebius (talk) 17:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes, you're right, they do. --Myrabella (talk) 22:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I slightly favor this one, which gives a wider view of the city. It would seem strange to have a city scope and focus on a few buildings in a small area when we have this kind of picture. --Eusebius (talk) 22:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Cityscape Frankfurt.jpg: +1
2. Skyline Frankfurt.jpg: 0
=>
File:Cityscape Frankfurt.jpg: Promoted.
File:Skyline Frankfurt.jpg: Declined.

--Eusebius (talk) 10:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)