User talk:Dllu/Archive 1

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Dllu!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Puppyrender.png was uncategorized on 10 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Mazegenerated.png was uncategorized on 15 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Bml50 33.ogv was uncategorized on 15 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Bml50 30.ogv was uncategorized on 15 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Purpy Pupple's 2D Metaballs.jpg was uncategorized on 3 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:3869.png was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:2397.png was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:3000.png was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 2513.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 2502.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 5000.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 4500.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 4179.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 1999.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 2229.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 7702.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:SAM 4748.png was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glass ochem.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments But would this be very hard to make left and right hand side crop not so tight?--Mbz1 03:23, 21 November 2010 (UTC) ...Fixed. Purpy Pupple 03:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Muragl Picture

Thanks for the derivative work you did on the image of Muottas Muragl. It looks great, specially with the FP stamp on it ;-)

--Murdockcrc (talk) 13:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

File:SAM 4500.png

Hi. Thx for intresting image. How have you done it ? ( what program or src code ). Regards --Adam majewski (talk) 13:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC SUB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice motif and quality OK for QI.. --NorbertNagel 06:30, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

File:MAZE 30x20 DFS.ogv

Hi, well done on getting one of your images on the English Wikipedia front page, but I noticed something missing from the image: there's no entry and exit! --Marianian^(talk) 09:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sumas panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The black parts on the bottom need to be cropped out. Also, I think it could use some sharpening. --Óðinn 21:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)  Done. Purpy Pupple 02:35, 28 February 2013 (UTC) OK, good to go now. --Óðinn 05:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Seattleposters.jpg

File:Seattleposters.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conventionplacestation2 crop.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I just improved your categorizaton. --XRay 11:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capitolhill panorama 1 natural.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There is some acceptable noise in the lower part, due to the lightening conditions. But an impressive and accurate work. I would support it for FP too. --Hubertl 06:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC) Thanks, it is already nominated for FP. Dllu 06:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle skyway 6th and pine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall very good quality, some small traces of CA.-ArildV 07:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conventionplacestation3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 12:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicken fettuccine alfredo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hurricane ridge panorama 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:31, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hurricane ridge panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hurricane Ridge panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- DerFussi 05:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hurricane Ridge panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skyline trail looking south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:47, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Rainier from the Silver Queen Peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is slightly overprocessed, resulting inter alia in a posterized sky. Might be fixable. --Cccefalon 11:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment Slight color banding all over the sky, otherwise it's very good. --Iifar 17:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC  Done Reprocessed picture from raw file with new white balance. The posterization should be gone now thanks to the greater bit depth of the raw file. For comparison I have uploaded the unprocessed version straight out of camera. Thanks! Dllu 18:34, 4 July 2015 (UTC) It is much better, but you attracted now some color noise (look at the red pixels in the sky). This should be easy to resolve. --Cccefalon 15:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)  Done I've denoised the sky. As for the rest of the picture, denoising can remove some details so I decided not to do it. Some noise is a natural result of processing from the raw data of a very high resolution sensor since there is no access to the in-camera denoising ability. But this was taken at ISO 100 so the noise is not such a big concern anyway. Dllu 18:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC) Well done! It was worthy, to insist on better approaches, right? :) --Cccefalon 05:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel, Mount Rainier, June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-3 Otter N90422 Kenmore.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:23, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver N72355 Kenmore 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montlake Bridge east.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Freeway Park +3EV.JPG

And also:

• File:Freeway Park 0EV.JPG
• File:Freeway Park -3EV.JPG

Yours sincerely, SounderBruce 00:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Husky stadium from Lake Washington.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --A.Savin 23:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bellevue skyline from Lake Washington.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! High rise view of Capitol Hill at night, looking east from Pine and 9th.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 15:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerial view of Freeway Park at night, looking south from Pine and 9th.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 15:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capitol Hill as seen from 9th and Pine looking east towards Bellevue, WA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:32, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MOHAI Armory building at Lake Union Park west side high quality.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO not sharp enough and color noise. --XRay 10:32, 29 July 2015 (UTC)  Done I've reprocessed from the Raw file with wavelet denoising and sharpening. The sharpness looks okay to me if you consider the 36 megapixel size and that the resolving power in the center sufficient to make out fine detail such as the "Nordhoff family learning" text. Only the left side is unsharp due to (probably) a decentering defect in the lens. The reason for the noise was that the photo was initially about 1 stop underexposed and I was too aggressive with postprocessing. Dllu 16:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO much better and QI now. --XRay 18:32, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari California T right side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but the background needs a perspective correction. -- Spurzem 06:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment You could rotate the picture by about 2.5° and get the background straight, but then the car isn't, because it's obviously parked uphill. --Tsungam 06:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)  Done I wasn't aware perspective correction was something we did with cars, but the background was kind of irksome. So I rectified the image to the background. Dllu 07:53, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Beautiful car and good quality -- Spurzem 10:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver N72355 Kenmore 2 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Are you in the Seattle area?

Hi Dllu, I noticed that you are uploading photos from the Seattle area. Would you like to meet for coffee sometime, with me and/or other Seattle-area Wikimedians? --Pine^✉ 22:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Pine, sure! I'd love to go get coffee sometime. How about Monday evening? Or Tuesday evening, or Wednesday, or Thursday. I'm leaving Seattle on August 9th to go to Pittsburgh. dllu (t,c) 00:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Wednesday evening would work for me. The Seattle Wikimedians customarily meet at Cafe Allegro near the University of Washington. Would that work for you at 6 PM on Wednesday? Also, if it's ok with you, I can invite other Seattle Wikimedians to join us for casual conversation. --Pine^✉ 00:39, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Pine, Wednesday at 6 pm at Cafe Allegro sounds good. See you there! dllu (t,c) 08:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Great. Peaceray plans to join us as well. I will try to remember to wear a Wikipedia t-shirt so that you can identify me. --Pine^✉ 05:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

apparently the buses in w:convention place station are super crowded at this time so I might be later than expected. dllu (t,c) 00:48, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:High rise view of Capitol Hill at night, looking east from Pine and 9th.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:High rise view of Capitol Hill at night, looking east from Pine and 9th.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Upstairs at Cafe Allegro

Pine & I are upstairs at Cafe Allegro. Peaceray (talk) 00:56, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streetcar 301 in South Lake Union, Seattle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me - nice exposure, good perspective, good sharpness --SkywalkerPL 20:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimedians Pine and Peaceray at Cafe Allegro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sympathic guys. QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 10:01, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sound Transit Route 512.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather noisy but QI for me. -- Spurzem 09:49, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Student Union Building of the University of British Columbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 05:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Clock Tower and IKB Learning Centre as seen from Hennings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Abbotsford looking towards Mission.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Museum of Natural History as seen from Cathedral of Learning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newell Simon Hall atrium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CMU Tennis Courts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Mellon University as seen from the Cathedral of Learning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect but ok --Poco a poco 18:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mercer Island, aerial photograph..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support I've added {{Object location}} with the coordinates from the article. In my experience, exact camera coordinates for aerial images like this are very difficult to to determine afterwards. Also added a rough viewing direction in the description. That should be enough to fulfill the geocoding requirement in this case. --El Grafo (talk) 09:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello ! I nominated this picture of yours, and it is a success. A gift for you ! Congratulations.--Jebulon (talk) 08:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Hooray! Thanks so much Jebulon! dllu (t,c) 19:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Learning as seen from Gates Hillman Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please categorize it Ezarate 22:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Question Where is this, in New Zeland?--Moroder 11:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC) I've updated the categories and description. Dllu 05:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 20:44, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Football at Carnegie Mellon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Needs a bit more defringing (and looks like warming-up). --C messier 09:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC) I think the amount of fringing is minimal. You have to pixel-peep in a 36 megapixel photo to see them. Dllu 05:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment I remembered them more pronounced.  Support --C messier 17:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crack shack in Pittsburgh Shadyside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 17:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jared Cohon University Center at Carnegie Mellon University.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perspective correction required, then QI of course --Isiwal 18:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)  Done Dllu 00:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Isiwal 06:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh city pano 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh dawn city pano 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omni William Penn Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shiloh Street on Mount Washington, Pittsburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:39, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh Light Rail on the Panhandle Bridge over the Monongahela River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allegheny County Courthouse skyway over Ross St in Pittsburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh Light Rail Siemens SD-400 leaving First Avenue Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Michael Barera 00:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penn Ave Skyway in Pittsburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check for CAs at the top of the foot walk.--XRay 06:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC) Fixed Dllu 07:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)  Support Yes, IMO OK now. --XRay 08:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh skyline 2015 from Mount Washington.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ascending the Duquesne Incline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. And nice perspective! --Michael Barera 02:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Delicious, SweeTango, Granny Smith, and Gala apples 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilot Metropolitan silver with python design.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilot Varsity.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pittsburgh Light Rail on the Panhandle Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grocery store sushi from Pittsburgh 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, this one is QI now! --Hubertl 19:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duquesne Incline lower building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 04:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segway riders touring Mellon Square Park, Pittsburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Downtown Fifth Avenue in Pittsburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! First Avenue Station, Pittsburgh 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! First Avenue Station, Pittsburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)