Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.


It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 15:57, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Oslo metro edit

Hi Ekko,
first thank you very much for your offer :-) Sorry, that I answer so late. I`m actually at Spain and have not allways Internet. If you can, take photos from the stations

  • Majorstuen
  • Nationaltheatret
  • Jernbanetorget
  • and Tøyen

And, if you can, take please a photo of street-metro-crossing with a train, e.g. at Vinderen. And last but not least *g* please take a photo from the newest metro train. If you can`t take anyone image, doesn`t matter! Greetings from Spain --Jcornelius 16:42, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image:SporvognS83.jpg edit

I've added a info box with nynorsk (may need corrections), bokmål and danish descriptions. Used no:Majorstuen for all except nynorsk (nn:Majorstua) since this is the official name. Den moderate bokmålsmannen Nsaa 13:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Muldyret edit

Muldyret utenfor Rikshospitalet er slettet, ettersom åndsverksloven ikke tillater kommersiell bruk av bilder der et vernet kunstverk er hovedmotiv, jfr. http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-19610512-002.html#24. Cnyborg 01:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Quality image edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hurum kirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--Ikiwaner 07:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Deletion request of duplicate image edit

Image:Bitihorn north.jpg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Bitihorn north.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Berland 20:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apikal4D.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


File tagging File:Oldtidsveien_royken.gif edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oldtidsveien_royken.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Oldtidsveien_royken.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ChristianBier (talk) 04:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

t-bane bilder :-) edit

Hei! Du har jo tatt mange bra bilder av t-banen tidligere. Vi t-bane-nerdene er likevel fremdeles på jakt etter flere bilder, så hvis du skulle ha noen på maskinen tatt tidligere som ikke er upload'a til commons ville vi satt veldig stor pris på om de ble dette :-) (ikke ment som noe press av noe slag altså) Yosh3000 (talk) 21:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Takk for påminnelsen! Nei, jeg har ingen liggende, men jeg har tenkt på det, nå som det blir vår og lysere kvelder. Jeg jobber i Oslo, men har noen mils reisevei. Når det blir motorsykkel- (i stedet for buss-)sesong, kan jeg ta noen ettermiddager å kjøre rundt og fotografere. Bortsett fra de nye settene, er det noe spesielt som savnes? --Ekko (talk) 13:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok :-) Du må for all del ikke stresse med det altså, var mest om du hadde noen inne. Det er en del bilder av MX3000 igrunnen, (se Category:MX3000 ), det som man mangler mest av er bilder fra stasjonene på Holmenkollbanen, og til en viss grad fra Grorudbanen og Røabanen (Kolsåsbanen er under oppgradering så regner med det kommer mer til denne etterhvert). Ellers er det jo bare å rote rundt på Category:Oslo subway og se hva som er der allerede. Yosh3000 (talk) 22:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tetralogy of Fallot edit

hi, some months ago you mention a mistake in my diagram . i didnt had time then but i have it now, could you explain me where the mistake is? and if you have a source image it would be helpfull too -LadyofHats (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm currently on vacation. I'll get back to you in a couple of weeks. --Ekko (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ekko!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 12:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Womanonsideinlung.jpg edit

 
File:Womanonsideinlung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Owain.davies (talk) 12:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply