User talk:Faigl.ladislav/archive1
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image Tagging Image:Nessziona.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Nessziona.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Mapka-makabejsti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Image deletion warning | Image:2_girls_kissing_boobs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
William Avery (talk) 20:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Shimon_Peres_inauguration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Mormegil (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | Image:Girls-backside1.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
--Kimsə (talk) 05:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
GREETINGS FROM MEXICO!
editHola amigo, saludos desde México, te escribo para decirte que los países en idioma náhuatl aún no están designados oficialmente, los nombres que encuentras en Huiquipedia solo son propuestas de los usuarios que hasta el momento han funcionado muy bien, pero eso no significa que son correctos. En el náhuatl moderno se dicen de igual manera que en el idioma español.
Hele kámo, pozdravy z Mexika, Píši vám říct, že v zemích, Nahuatl nejsou dosud oficiálně jmenován, jména, která jsou na Huiquipedia jsou pouze návrhy uživatelů, kteří až dosud pracovali velmi dobře, ale to neznamená, že jsou správné. V moderní Nahuatl říci, je stejné jako ve španělském jazyce.
Hi my friend, greetings from Mexico, I am writing to tell you that the countries in Nahuatl language are not yet officially designated, the names that are at Huiquipedia are only suggestions of users who so far have worked very well, but that does not mean they are correct. In the modern Nahuatl say is the same as in the Spanish language.
user:Marrovi October 11, 2008.
Image Tagging Image:Western_Wall_-_Charedim.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Western_Wall_-_Charedim.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. How do you turn this on (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token d6e949b5ef80e57e8b5ea50e9024ad54
editI am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Ahoj, když chceš smazat nějaký obrázek, a máš proto relevantní důvod, použij prosím šablonu {{Speedy}}, ne {{Delete}}, ta šablna se užívá k nominacím na smazáním. U toho obrázku výše jsi totiž nedokončil nominační proces, který je trošku složitější než jen vložení té šablony delete - návod na to je u toho výše zmíněného obrázku. Zdraví --Podzemnik (talk) 15:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- Dík za radu :-)
Pay attention to copyright | File:Art or Sex? Everything's For Sale.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
TUSC token 6143ed6412d41271e60f4628db049720
editI am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Dvojlicencovaná vlastního díla
editAhoj, jsem rád, že se někdo připojil k přesunu obrázků z české Wikipedie. Chtěl bych jenom upozornit, že pokud se jedná o dvojlicencované vlastní dílo musí být licenční šablona na Commons ve tvaru např. {{Self|Cc-by-sa-2.5|GFDL}}. Viz např. má editace zde. S pozdravem --sevela.p (talk) 02:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Dám na to bacha, dík za info.--Faigl.ladislav (talk) 12:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gravestone at the National Cemetery Terezin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Limor_sharir.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sv1xv (talk) 04:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Elena Ralph.JPG
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Elena Ralph.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Okki (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Pedigree1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Blacklake (talk) 18:39, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
|
File:Katherine Heigl .jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I notice this is the second such notice you receive. I also see that the Flickr user was already listed on Commons:Questionable Flickr images. Please do not upload files from accounts listed there. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Independencetlv.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Spolupráce
editChápu, že spoustakrát se ti stane, stejně jako komukoliv jinému, že narazíš na obrázek nebo na informaci, o kterých si řekneš - tak tohle se mi tedy osobně zdá úplně zbytečné. Anebo - koho to může zajímat? Zbytečně bychom se tu potloukli, kdybychom místo konstruktivní práce druhým mazali to, co se nám zdá zbytečné. Umazávat kategorii nikoliv proto, že do ní fotka objektivně nepatří, ale proto, že tobě osobně zařazení do ní nepřipadá užitečné (a někomu jinému zjevně ano, jinak by ji tam býval nedával) je zbytečně konfliktní činnost. Mně třeba občas připadají jako zbytečný rozmar kategorie typu Category:time 15:55, Category:90 (number) nebo Category:Red and white vehicles. Ale evidentně je tu dost kolegů, kterým připadají užitečné a které z nějakého důvodu baví do nich soubory zařazovat, ať už je to nějak odborně využitelné anebo je to prostě jen jejich záliba. Proč bych jim to měl kazit jen kvůli tomu, že mně to někdy připadá pošetilé? No a podobně někdo občas popíše fotku nějak jako "žánrový obrázek z Prahy" nebo "česká krajina" anebo "jakýsi brouk" nebo "mraky" anebo dokonce ji nepopíše vůbec a nezařadí nikam. Možná že leckomu je skutečně upřímně jedno, z kterého míst Prahy nebo Čech ta fotka je nebo kde a jaký mrak anebo co to je za brouka, vždyť přece havěť jako havěť, jíst se to nedá. Snaha tu fotku lépe popsat a zařadit by se skoro vždycky klidně dala shodit i nějakou ironickou poznámkou. Ale předpokládejme, prosím, že takové fotky - i když je třeba vyfotí náhodou někdo, kdo se o téma víc nezajímá nebo to lépe popsat neuměl či neměl čas, tu jsou i pro toho, kdo se o příslušné téma zajímá hlouběji. Tobě osobně a zřejmě několika dalším lidem třeba zřejmě přijde proti srsti kategorizovat popelnice podle regionu anebo uvést, ve které obci byla vyfocena. Proč nepřipustíte, že pokud někdy někdo bude psát specializované články o typech popelnic anebo o svozu odpadu anebo se o to prostě bude zajímat, tak pro něj ty informace zajímavé budou? Zrovna třeba popelnice, domovní čísla nebo dopravní značky jsou typické tím, že si je může každá obec objednávat u jiného dodavatele, v každém regionu a miniregionu jsou úplně jiné zvyklosti atd. - může to být podobně zajímavé jako regionální zvláštnosti architektury, biotopů nebo folkloru. Zajímavé jsou jak unikáty a vzácnosti, tak typičnosti, a vždy jsou cennější s popisem než bez popisu.
V jakémkoliv sběratelství a jakékoliv dokumentační činnosti je dobrým zvykem všechno předem a kvalitně popisovat. Takový ten krátkozraký utilitarizmus, že si třeba někdo řekne: měsíc a den nebudou pro nikoho zajímavé, napíšu do data jen rok - se prostě k podobnému projektu nehodí a zbytečně snižují kvalitu. Vzpomínám si, jak jsem kdysi četl články o tom, jak někdo vykradl nějakou archeologickou expozici anebo jak nějací ti "divocí archeologové" pomocí minohledačky nashromáždili spoustu nálezů, jenže je měli v jedné velké hromadě bez popisů, protože nechápali, že cena takových nálezů je spojena s přesným popisem a bez něj to má hodnotu třeba stokrát menší. Totéž platí i třeba pro sběratele minerálů: sbírají zdánlivě obyčejné šutry, jaké najdeš na stovkách lokalit ve spoustě zemí, ale když ti k tomu šutru chybí popis, na kterém poli nebo kopci nebo aspoň u které obce jsi ho našel, tak je na burzách prakticky bezcenný a neprodejný anebo má zlomek ceny, kterou by měl s popisem.
Zkus se nad tím, prosím, zamyslet. Byl bych nerad, kdybychom kvůli tahanicím o takovéhle věci si tady na Commons docela zbytečně narušovali jinak poměrně konstruktivní atmosféru, která tady vesměs je (řekněme že ze všech "sledovaných změn" v průměru tak sotva procento je nějak problematické). Zkusme se zde prosím soustředit spíše na konstruktivní práci, jako je rozšiřování a upřesňování popisů souborů, přeřazování do přesnějších kategorií, kategorizaci nedostatečně kategorizovaných souborů, opravování chyb atd. a nemažme si navzájem to, co se možná někomu může zdát zbytečné, ale není to vyloženě chybně. --ŠJů (talk) 12:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Josef_Formánek.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Josef_Formánek.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Podzemnik (talk) 07:26, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Kathryn Morris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Scarlett_Johansson_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Egon Erwin Kisch
editDear Faigl.ladislav,
please be so kind to grant me the right to use your picture http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Egon-Ervin-Kisch-Plaque.JPG for all editions of the publication "Wir vom Jahrgang 1932", Wartberg-Verlag. Easiest would be an email to der@textmaker.at. What copyright-remark do you wish?
Thanks and kind greetings Helmuth
File:Medal of Valor Medal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Faigl.ladislav_and_Basha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Faigl.ladislav.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Faigl.ladislav2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Adrignola talk 01:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Please remain calm and collegial
edit