User talk:Florstein/Archive/2017

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voznesensky Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikalov Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 18:43, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikalov Bridge Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krasnogvardeysky Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 18:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mogilevsky Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 18:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 88-90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 133 (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 134 (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:53, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Podyachesky Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Srednyaya Podyacheskaya Street SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 19:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimskogo-Korsakova Avenue (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pastorova Street SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 19:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter Palace Panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Small Hermitage SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griboedov Canal Embankment 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 12-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 22-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be better with less empty sky. --XRay 17:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 18:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Admiralty Eastern Wing SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Admiralty Western Wing SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. --C messier 12:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is green CA in all the recesses of the central house and some purple CA at the white. You think you could fix this? W.carter 09:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC) W.carter, please look, I tried to fix the most of CA's. --Florstein 09:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Much better! Good quality. W.carter 14:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lesnoy-61 Blockade Sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aptekarskaya Embankment SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aptekarsky Avenue SPB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aptekarsky Bridge SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bold picture with the blown out clouds hidden in the haze. At first I thought it was overexposed, but looking closer I realized it was haze. Overall good quality. --W.carter 22:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyborgskaya Embankment (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerhard Cotton Manufactory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nevka Cotton Manufactory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manufactories of Vyborgskaya Side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Residential House of Nikolaevskaya Manufactory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice photo imo.--ArildV 10:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 62-64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angliyskaya Embankment SPB 54-58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metro SPB Line3 Vasileostrovskaya Pavilion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, people on the photo add something to it. Interesting perspective, sharp enough, a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 20:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC) to it

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosque SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! James Beck Cotton Manufactory SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grenadersky Brdge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! English Embankment Pierce SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Datsan Gunzechoinei (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:19, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreevsky Cathedral SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreevsky Market SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreevsky Boulevard SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bugsky Lane SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metro SPB Administration Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beringa Street 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odoevskogo Street 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough, perspective good enough, quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 09:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus MAZ-203-085 in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus NefAZ-5299-30-32 in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram 71-623-03 in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram LM-68M3 in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram LM-68M3 in SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 14:30, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trams LM-68M3 and 71-623-03 in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trams LM-68M3 and 71-623-03 in SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Добавил улицу --A.Savin 11:15, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram LM-99K in SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 19:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kresty Prison.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Вери гуд. Только там наверху в середине белый треугольник, нужно его замазать либо отрезать чуть-чуть неба сверху --A.Savin 19:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Television Tower SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram LM-68M Training Car.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 10:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument To Victims of Political Repression (fragment).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gagarinskaya Street SPB 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metro SPB Line1 Vyborgskaya Vestibule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metro SPB Line1 Vyborgskaya Platform.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streetlamp SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Television Tower SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kantemirovsky Bridge Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamennoostrovsky Bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lopukhinsky Garden SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aptekarskaya Embankment (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сhimney SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aptekarskaya Embankment (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 14:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aptekarskaya Embankment (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aptekarskaya Embankment (img4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyborgskaya Embankment (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyborgskaya Embankment (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Afanasiy Nikitin Monument in Tver.jpg

And also:

• File:Alexander Popov's Monument SPB.jpg
• File:Lomonosovskaya metrostation relief.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line1 Avtovo mosaic.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line2 Chyornaya rechka Pushkin.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Admiralteyskaya the vestibule panel.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Bukharestskaya mosaic.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Mezhdunarodnaya mosaic.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Sportivnaya Hallway Mosaic.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Sportivnaya Lower Hall Mosaic.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Sportivnaya Vestibule 1 Mosaic.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Sportivnaya Vestibule 2 Mosaic.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Volkovskaya mosaic.jpg
• File:Metro SPB Line5 Zvenigorodskaya mosaic panel.jpg

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Logo 5TV 2000-2001.svg

And also:

• File:Logo 5TV 91-94.svg

Yours sincerely, Яй (talk) 05:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Logo SPbTV 1991-1994.jpg

File:Logo SPbTV 1991-1994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 08:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Florstein/common.js

Hi Florstein, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Florstein/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 1 character 17: Unclosed string. - Evidence: '$( function() {
2. ISSUE: line 2 character 3: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: '' $( ".searchResultImage a.image img" ).each( function() { if ( this.width*3 < $(this).data( 'file-width' )) {this.srcset = ''; this.src = this.src.replace( /\d+(px-[^\/]*$)/, (this.width*3) +"$1" );this.width = this.width*1.5; this.height = this.height*1.5} } );
3. ISSUE: line 4 character 1: Expected '(end)' and instead saw '}'. - Evidence: });

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 10:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Florstein/common.js

Hi Florstein, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Florstein/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 1 column 18: Unexpected token ILLEGAL

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 10:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC).