Open main menu

Contents

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. INeverCry 19:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Спасибо. Gandvik (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Категории марокEdit

Добрый день, пришла из-за этой правки. Не нужно просто так вынимать файлы из этой категории, она помогает легко найти, на каких марках есть города Беларуси, если вы создаёте отдельную категорию для конкретного города, то пусть тогда в "марки по городам" будет включена эта категория целиком. Ну и слово stamps в названиях подобных категорий традиционно для унификации пишется с маленькой буквы. Поэтому я создала новую категорию с уточнёнными включениями, а ваша станет перенаправлением или можете выставить её к удалению. В любом случае спасибо за помощь с категоризацией марок, если что, обращайтесь.--Хомелка (talk) 05:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Да, только что заметила, что и в случае с "Орша в искусстве" у вас та же проблема. art нужно с маленькой буквы, и вы не учитываете, что у категории вида "Что-то в чём-то" должно быть 2 категории: "что-то" и "чём-то". Т. е., например "Минск на марках" включаем в "Минск в искусстве" и в "Города Беларуси на марках", а "Минск в искусстве" включаем в "Минск" и в "Города Беларуси в искусстве" и т. д. Это же делается не для раздробления категорий как такового, а для лучшего поиска и для тех, кто интересуется Минском, и для тех, кто интересуется искусством. В общем, я сейчас смотрю ваш вклад и попробую поисправлять немного, но и вы, пожалуйста, сделайте то же или по крайней мере, учтите на будущее. Потому что я в своё время приложила огромные усилия, чтобы вытянуть эти марки к общим категориям, а вы их снова топите в частных новообразованиях с неверными названиями.--Хомелка (talk) 05:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Аналогично здесь и здесь, но думаю, что ход моих мыслей уже должен быть понятен.--Хомелка (talk) 06:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Спасибо за обучение. В качестве извинения и оправдания приведу известное выражение "Не ошибается только тот, кто ничего не делает." Стал делать - пошли в т.ч. и ошибки. В любом случае - спасибо за ценные замечания. --Gandvik (talk) 16:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Я тоже приношу свои извинения за резкий тон, к сожалению я увидела ваши правки до утреннего кофе. После тёплой чашки я увидела всё другими глазами и ваш вклад несомненно очень полезен. И спасибо вам за него огромное. Если будут сомнения, не стесняйтесь спрашивать :).--Хомелка (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Планы замковEdit

сравните здесь и здесь названия категорий, пожалуйста. Видите разницу? А между тем весьма желательно создавать в подобных случаях однотипные названия, как для унификации, так и для удобства пользования гаджетами быстрой перекатегоризации, например хоткатом. В любом случае, слово plans должно бы быть с маленькой буквы, ибо так грамотнее. Прошу вас переделать эти категории (нужно просто создать новую, а в старой сделать редирект, бот придёт и сам перенесёт файлы), и в следующий раз уточнять предварительно типовой вид названия категории, желательно по нескольким странам, чтобы не напороться на чужую ошибку.--Хомелка (talk) 06:52, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Спасибо. Учту. --Gandvik (talk) 16:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Исправил. --Gandvik (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Красота :). Спасибо.--Хомелка (talk) 08:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

ПросьбаEdit

[1] Здравствуйте. Просьба: 1. Не обрезать оригинальные исторические невоспроизводимые фотографии. 2. Давать ссылку на исходник (источник), которая открывается (попробуйте открыть). 3. Не изменять расширение файла (он изначально джипег, вы лучше его никак не сделаете), чтобы его можно было перезагрузить. 4. Переносить полное описание и все категории. 5. Просьба переносить все лицензии - они не просто так стоят, ПД-олд недостаточно, могут удалить (если фотограф умер после 1943 года). Большое спасибо. --Vizu (talk) 17:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Спасибо. То, что понял из этих пунктов, - в будущих правках буду учитывать. --Gandvik (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

PD-Art tagsEdit

Hello, Gandvik. When you want to identify an image as over 100 years old, please use the tag "PD-old-100" instead of "PD-Old-100" (note the difference in capitalization) to ensure proper categorization. Thanks. --R'n'B (talk) 15:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks. --Gandvik (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Gandvik,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Sergey Alexandrovich of Russia by C.Bergamasco (1869).jpgEdit

Добрый день! не подскажете, что это за форма у вел. кн. на фотографии? Эти, из царской семьи, постоянно в такой позируют. Вот ведь она же? это какие-то гусары? может, подскажете, какой полк, и тогда сразу туда их запихивать можно... --Shakko (talk) 08:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Мундиры - гуссарские (на первом изображении видно ташку). Судя по внешнему виду - лейб-гвардии гусарские. (В мундирах обычных частей члены императорской фамилии, насколько я знаю, вообще не рисовались. Им по статусу - только мундиры гвардейских частей.) Лейб-гвардии гусарских полков было два: Гродненский лейб-гвардии гусарский (зелёный цвет доломана и ментика) и Лейб-гвардии Гусарский Его Величества (красный цвет доломана и ментика(белый ментик?)). Первое изображение чёрно-белое и цвет на нем не определить. Синий цвет на втором изображении меня озадачил. Видимо Вам стоит обратиться к специалистам по униформе этого периода, каковым я не являюсь. --Gandvik (talk) 09:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
спасибо. На самом деле это зеленый. Значит, первый. И другие вел.князья тоже все время в этом. Shakko (talk) 10:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
В статье Лейб-гвардии Гусарский Его Величества полк. В разделе "Изменения в форме и вооружении" под катом цветные литографии разных лет. В середине XIX века фигурируют в том числе и синие мундиры (как повседневная форма).--Gandvik (talk) 11:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Вот изображение командира этого полка в мундире опять же синего цвета.--Gandvik (talk) 11:51, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
нехорошие люди. Видимо, надо тупо смотреть по послужному списку моделей.--Shakko (talk) 13:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
короче их миллион и все разные. Есть даже Елизаветградские и Ахтырские. Положила всех сюда, вдруг пригодится Category:Russian hussars uniform (Romanovs). --Shakko (talk) 10:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Ivan HrechinjukEdit

Hello Gandvik,

Please dont remove the category Category:Ivan Hrechinjuk witout discussion. -- Geagea (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok. --Gandvik (talk) 15:04, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Khadzhibey CemeteriesEdit

 
Category:Khadzhibey Cemeteries has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yuriy Kvach (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Khadzhibey CemeteriesEdit

DLindsley Need something? 20:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Museum-reserve "Malaya zemlya" Monument.jpgEdit

 
File:Museum-reserve "Malaya zemlya" Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Churchill CrocodileEdit

The tank is outside the D-Day museum in Southsea Portsmouth. It is right next to this tank.Geni (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Sanks. --Gandvik (talk) 08:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aliaga.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aliaga.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aliaga.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 16:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Katanga-1-avers.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Katanga-1-avers.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Katanga-1-avers.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Arlou Uladzimer.JPGEdit

Why did you remove the category from the file? There is a nice photo of St. Sophia church in Polotsk in the background. The is no other photo of this church like this in commons. --37.17.115.23 18:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bez-Kornilovich.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bez-Kornilovich.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tsesarevich Postcard.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tsesarevich Postcard.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Ivan Aleksandrovsky 2.jpgEdit

 
File:Ivan Aleksandrovsky 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Максим Підліснюк (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ivan Aleksandrovsky.jpgEdit

 
File:Ivan Aleksandrovsky.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Максим Підліснюк (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Overwritten fileEdit

You overwrote the content of File:Female Nikolaevckiy cenobitic monastery in Tashkent47.jpg. At the request of uploader of the original file, I've performed a history split on that file. Your content is now at File:Female Nikolaevckiy cenobitic monastery in Tashkent47 (cropped).jpg. —RP88 (talk) 18:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Female Nikolaevckiy cenobitic monastery in Tashkent47 (cropped).jpgEdit

 
File:Female Nikolaevckiy cenobitic monastery in Tashkent47 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bobyrr (talk) 08:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Ruth - Hayez.jpgEdit

Hi! Regarding this edit, I think you should upload the coloured version as a separate file, because the version that I uploaded is the photograph of a painting exposed in the museum cited in the description. This painting is in black and white. Your image is another version of the same painting exposed in another museum. --Incola (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Rus Stamp-Ivan Fedorov-1964.jpgEdit

 
File:Rus Stamp-Ivan Fedorov-1964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ScriWi (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Nikolskii skit Diveyevsky monastery.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nikolskii skit Diveyevsky monastery.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nikolskii skit Diveyevsky monastery.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Zentr asii.jpgEdit

 
File:Zentr asii.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dogad75 (talk) 20:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Donbass Arena Ball.jpgEdit

 
File:Donbass Arena Ball.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dogad75 (talk) 22:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Dogad75 (talk) 21:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Mogila Fernandelya-na-Passi.jpgEdit

 
File:Mogila Fernandelya-na-Passi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dogad75 (talk) 04:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Dzhokhar Tsarnaev 2.jpgEdit

 
File:Dzhokhar Tsarnaev 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Mens_served_as_Chevalier_GuardsEdit

E4024 (talk) 09:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Ул._Карла_Маркса,_12а.JPGEdit

Добрый день.
Раз Вы бываете в Смоленске, то потрудитесь объяснить, откуда дом 14 (на фото справа) можно было сфотографировать так, чтобы вышло то фото, что показано слева.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Обязательно объясню, как только сам выясню. :) Это разные здания. Адреса их сейчас выясняю. Как только выясню - подправлю. Пока оставил как есть (до выяснения). Ситуация, что называется "в процессе". С уважением --Gandvik (talk) 12:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Выяснять видимо придётся на месте. Это займёт по-времени...--Gandvik (talk) 12:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Так и есть. Эти два здания, стоящие по-соседству, юридически имеют один адрес. При этом являются двумя разными памятниками архитектуры. Как-то так... --Gandvik (talk) 12:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Category:Emelyan_KorneevEdit

SealMan11 (talk) 00:41, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Gandvik".