Godfellow

Welcome to the Commons, Godfellow!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Larka-framkalln.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 10:55, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

--- I´m sorry, but I don´t understand what the problem is, please explain. The photografer has given his permission to use the picture in "any way I like". My question to him pointed out that a GNU-free license would give anyone opportunity to use the picture under the rules for the license, whith link to the rules. I also pointed out that the picture I would upload was a scanned picture from a book, and that I would use the format I did, Thats why I can´t upload a ´better picture, I don´t have the permission to do that.--Godfellow 10:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Permissions

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Many of Larka images you uploaded seems to have permission only for se.wikipeadia.org use. That is not enought for images in commons. All images should have relased under free licence. Also image Image:Transsymbol.gif you put under gfdl license, but source doesn't have that license. --Tomia 17:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, that was not what I asked the photografer and Mora Kommun, which is the copyrightholders to the pictures. I did write that the pictures was intended for an article on Sv wikipedia,(thats whay the www-adress appears) but I also specified that they, if they were were published, would be possible to use for anyone, under tha rules of GNU-free-license. I also did give them a link to the license and the rules. Maybe is the problem that my letter and their answers is on swedish, or that the whole letter isn´t published, because the length of it?--Godfellow 11:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

About the transgender-symbol

The source says: "WHO OWNS IT?

The symbol of a circle joining the elements of male, female, and the two combined, came from many sources, and is owned by none. Please use it.

The representation that you see as a lavender triangle and blue symbol with rounded line ends, executed with symmetry throughout, belongs to Nangeroni Design, i.e. me. I give the symbol as a service to our community, for everyone's use. I would ask that we make it stand for honor & integrity, compassion for all, and good humor.

Sorry, but I no longer provide the pins." (my marking)

I would say that makes it okey to put it (The lavender triangle with rounded line ends and a blue trans-sign) under a GNU-license, in the way I did.--213.114.210.22 12:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)(godfellow, out-logged)Reply

Well, when you put it under GFDL, you claim indirectly that you own it and have the right to publish it under a free license. It would probably be better to use some PD template and write exactly what the site says about the license. /Grillo 22:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Rosen202.gif

Latest comment: 15 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

You've uploaded a derivative work

We're sorry, but File:Rosen202.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Plrk (talk) 14:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

There must be a missunderstanding of some sort, there was a text that informed about why the symbol was alright to publich under the GNU-licence. By the way, "Rosen202.gif" is not a photo, but a picture, sure we even talk about the same file?--217.21.232.237 13:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hej Godfellow, jag antar att det är du och isåfall misstycker du inte att jag talar svenska. Den ursprungliga rosen skapades av sv:Javier Mariscal, och såvida inte han överfört upphovsrätten till någon annan - t ex det Socialdemokratiska partiet - är det fortfarande han som äger upphovsrätten till rosen. HBT-Sossarnas logotyp, som är samma ros fast med lite glada färger, är ett derivativt arbete - det vill säga, ett verk som är baserat på ett tidigare verk (här utan något som helst försök att dölja det, det är lite utav poängen). Eftersom det är ett derivativt arbete är det bundet av samma upphovsrättsliga termer som originalverket, den ursprungliga rosen, som HBT-Sossarnas ordförande knappast äger rätt att förfoga över. Om du vill ladda upp rosen igen måste du se till att de som kontrollerar upphovsrätten, d v s Mariscal eller möjligtvis SAPs Verkställande utskott, släpper den under en fri licens - och det kommer knappast att hända. Dessutom framgick det inte av det ursprungliga mailet från HBT(S)-s ordf att personen ifråga var riktigt med på att du skulle licensiera bilden under GFDL - att den är "ok att använda" betyder inte att du får licensiera den under The GNU Free Documentation License. (Att bilden talades om som ett foto beror på att mallen jag använde var dålig, förresten.) Plrk (talk) 15:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jag är övertygad om att partiet äger upphovsrätten till Rosen, och av tradition är det så att även om Mångfaldsrosen är ett derivativt verk är det HBT-socialdemokraterna som har rätten att besluta om användningen av det. Därav den ursprungliga texten från dåvarande vice ordförande. Jag förstår dock att endast mitt ord på detta inte räcker, utan kommer att gräva fram ordentliga besked från rätt instans så vi alla vet vad som gäller.

Såvitt jag förstår borde det gå att lägga upp bilder på Commons under "Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-Inga bearbetningar 3.0 Unported License". Det vore förmodligen det bästa för vår del. Går det, hur gör man enklast?--213.114.210.23 19:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tyvärr går upphovsrättslagstiftning framför SAP-rörelsens traditioner. Eftersom Commons skall vara ett fritt mediearkiv så måste derivativa verk tillåtas, och även kommersiell användning - "Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-Inga bearbetningar 3.0 Unported License" är således inte okej för uppladdning på commons. Läs gärna lite på Commons:Licensing (som tyvärr inte är översatt till svenska ännu) Plrk (talk) 20:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vet inte om jag tycker det är "tyvärr", det är som det ska vara. Jag minns uppenbarligen fel, jag trodde Creative Commons-licenser var acceptabla i flera olika former. Å andra sidan, med tanke på hur snårig GDFL-licensen är så avhåller den nog de flesta från att missbruka bilder upplagda under den på Commons. ;-).--213.114.210.23 23:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ett flertal CC-licenser är acceptabla, men inte de som innehåller "ickekommersiell" eller "inga bearbetningar". Men är du nu på det klara med varför bilden togs bort? Plrk (talk) 16:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Larka-Svealarka-pa-Hemulberget.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Larka-Svealarka-pa-Hemulberget.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

grillo (talk) 10:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Larka-Svealarka-pa-Hemulberget.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Larka-Svealarka-pa-Hemulberget.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

grillo (talk) 01:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vad är meningen med att lägga dubbla raderingsvarningsmallar?--Godfellow (talk) 07:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Larka-amerikanskkamera.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Larka-amerikanskkamera.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:30, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Larka-axi-fabodar.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Larka-axi-fabodar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

grillo (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic