Henriok

Image Tagging Image:XPC750.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:XPC750.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 15:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Henriok!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Great Black-backed Gull2.jpg is uncategorized since 31 May 2009.
• Image:CharlesEdgePhoto090918.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2009.
• Image:Power4 core schema.png was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Power4 chip schema.png was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:QCDOC chip schema.png was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Power3 chip schema.png was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:RSC chip schema.png was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

---

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Apple A5 Chip.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Apple A6 Chip.jpg

File:Apple A6 Chip.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Tabercil (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Apple A6 Chip.jpg

File:Apple A6 Chip.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 01:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Apple A7 chip.jpg

I updated the description in the summary section of your File:Apple A7 chip.jpg illustration, as it looks like you accidentally left the description the same as your earlier File:Apple A6 Chip.jpg illustration. You might want to check if my update is accurate (based on the illustration size and details, I assumed you derived the A7 illustration from your previous A6 illustration). —RP88 08:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Apple S3

Hey, could you please upload the Apple S3 image and ping me after? You can find it in the iFixit teardown here. Thanks, your help is appreciated. Darius robin (talk) 09:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

PowerISA-evolution

Could you please add the Power ISA 3.0 B, released on March 2017, to PowerISA-evolution.svg ?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xose.vazquez (talk • contribs) 17:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Apple M1 chip

Hi! First of all amazing work on the illustration of the Apple M1 chip. It looks amazing. Only thing I would have changed slightly is the embedded text at the edges of the chip. There is not many images of the chip yet, but I found a good example on the Apple Event — November 10. With the following text:

• Top text: APL1W85 639709570
• Left side text: C3WFL 9638337
• Right side text: R9 07K 1820
• Bottom text: L1G1Y91486 1433

I'm also a little confused with why you upload the illustration as jpg, when example SVG is a lossless format. Regards Premeditated (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

That image is not of an actual processor, so that text is wrong. The creator of that graphics didn't know what they were doing, so they used copy/paste from previous imagery.

• The "APL1W85" is what the A13 Bionic is called, so we can't call it that.
• The "R9 07K 1820" says that its 4 GB LPDDR4X manufactured week 20 2018. It's probably the correct RAM type, but we are not sure. It could use DDR5 for all we know. But we know that it's more than 4 GB, and the date is at least 2 years off. We can't use that text. It's lifted from a A12.
• The "L1G1Y91486 1433". I don't know that the first part means, but the last says that the CPU part is manufactured week 33 2014, and that's just absurd :) We can't use that.

So.. this text is misleading, copy pasted from previous parts. I have no confidence that any of the text is correct in any meaningful way. Mine is at least not confusingly wrong.

I'm not even sure of the text layout. It can be one line on each vertex, or two lines at the top and bottom, or on the sides. Apple has done it all on previous parts. We don't know yet.

I will correct the writing when we get actual photographs of actual parts. Or.. in the case of what the part is named, when someone can do some deep diving into the actual OS on an actual machine.

And I use JPEG since the image is created mostly as a bitmap image. You wouldn't magically make it better if I saved it as SVG, not even the text as it's largely hand tuned in Photoshop. I instead make it more useable since there's larger support for JPEG than SVG. -- Henriok (talk) 12:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Someone has uploaded images of the component in a Mac Mini late 2020. That also feature an image of the new Apple M1 chip. It closely resemble the Apple A12 and A12X chip design. I just wanna let you know :) Regards Premeditated (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)