Open main menu

User talk:JLPC/Archive 3

Contents

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Genouillé (Facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aneth FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St-Amant 16 Blé et folle avoine 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Prenn 08:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys blanc détail FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais de Justice d'Angoulême (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbe Pampa FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good--Jebulon 22:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Profondeurs insondablesEdit

"Mon anglais manque vraiment de profondeur de champ" : Voilà un Mot que j'aurai aimé faire! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Là je dois reconnaître que j'ai bien ri, en effet. Mais comme tu m'avais précédemment bluffé avec la DOB et la DOD de Pigalle, j'ai vraiment cru qu'il s'agissait là d'un acronyme d'Outre-Manche que j'ignorais. Pas de malice donc dans ma demande. Pour la couronne, elle n'est pas spécifique à Angoulême, mais bien à toutes les cités ceintes de remparts. (J'ai un très gros faible pour l'héraldique, si tu as des besoins dans ce domaine, n'hésite pas !)--Jebulon (talk) 22:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coreopsis FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice. Prenn 01:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Civray 86 Post-box 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Nice and good for me, but the left side can be cropped IMO--Lmbuga 22:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
New review: Otherwise, QI for me--Lmbuga 00:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
OK for your suggestion. Thanks. --JLPC 21:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys royal 2 FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Done Is it better now ? --JLPC 17:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes, better now indeed Poco a poco 12:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angoulême town hall, gargoyles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courgettes boutons FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Much better indeed Poco a poco 15:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Armoiries marché 1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Image de Qualité (qu'est ce que ça veut dire :"DOF" ?)--Jebulon 21:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, corrected. Thanks. --JLPC 21:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Lion couronné 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Très bien--Jebulon 21:17, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Le complotEdit

Bonsoir,

Rien d'illégal là-dedans, que veux-tu, tu as trouvé un enthousiaste ! Ton fan club s'enrichit ! J'ai annoté la "nomination" afin que toi et les trois autres soyez "crédités", mais ce type de propositions est usuel. Ta photo lui a plu, hop, il la propose. Il peut. C'est maladroitement fait, mais plutôt flatteur, finalement ! L'inconvénient, c'est que c'est lui qui probablement recevra la notification de la promotion. En conséquence, je te conseille de "suivre" cette image ! Par exemple, tu auras peut-être vu à l'instant sur ma page une "FP promotion", car c'est moi qui l'ai proposée. Mais je n'en suis pas l'auteur. Mon usage et mon éthique veulent que je rapatrie ledit bandeau vers l'auteur de l'image, ce que je vais faire incessamment. Disons pudiquement que tous n'y pensent pas...--Jebulon (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiat 514 L 1 Angoulême 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Excellent photo, very good background. -- Lothar Spurzem 22:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiat 514 L 2 Angoulême 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality -- Lothar Spurzem 22:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême HdV Gargouilles&cheminées 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharp and good. --Cayambe 12:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Logis du Maine-GiraudEdit

Il manque le geocodage... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Bon comme tu es parti très loin j'ai fais comme pour moi...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Obézine Tympan 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
You are welcome to nominate pictures from other users, but it should be fair to credit the author User:JLPC, Thanks.--Jebulon 22:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC).Excellent quality -- Lothar Spurzem 22:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Egl Obézines Vierge 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Denoising of the statue a bit too strong IMO, but very nice and surprising composition. A QI, in my opinion.--Jebulon 23:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Balcons 4 saisons 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 13:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vendoire peat-bogs (Ecological museum, exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cleome hassleriana FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 20:00, 7. September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanule FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice picture, good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 22:43, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Description photo abbaye de MortimerEdit

Bonjour, J'ai oublié de photographier le panneau d'explication. Je fais mes photos à la volée dans le cadre de longues randos à vélo. En plus dimanche dernier le Soleil tapait vraiment dur au moment du passage à l'abbaye, j'étais pas trop lucide ... Pas trouvé de plan sur internet. --Pline (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logis du Maine-Giraud, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Dampierre ?Edit

Bonjour
On n'a pas les mêmes Dampierre en magasin, toi et moi... Mais je vais chercher, y'a des branches !
Amitiés --Jebulon (talk) 15:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Pardon pour cette (Dam)pierre dans ton jardin! Mais comme je te le dis, il y a plusieurs familles nobles portant ce nom, sans lien de parenté. Je cherche. Rien d'autre que ce que j'ai dans l'"Armorial Dubuisson" au nom de Dampierre. On y précise "de Picardie", ce qui laisse entendre qu'en effet, y'en a d'autres ailleurs ! La seule certitude concernant le blason, c'est que la bande est bleue. On peut en déduire un certain nombre de choses (ainsi, le fond de l'écu est obligatoirement soit "argent" (blanc), soit "or" (jaune), idem pour les étoiles, et que les besants (les ronds) ne sont ni l'un ni l'autre). Mais ça laisse quand même des possibilités dans de nombreuses combinaisons. Je ne renonce pas, mais ça ne va pas être facile...--Jebulon (talk) 10:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Balcon d'AngoulèmeEdit

Bonjour,

comme déjà dit dans mon commentaire sur QIC, la dominante bleue apparaît souvent sur les structures blanches quand le soleil tape. Il est bien possible que l'oeil capte cette dominante, mais que notre cerveau, qui 'sait' que ces parties sont blanches 'en réalité', redresse le défaut (excuse-moi, c'est le biologiste, à la retraite aussi, qui parle).

J'ai mis du temps à m'en rendre compte ... et depuis je recherche systématiquement ce défaut sur mes propres photos. Le remède : sélectionner les parties touchées de l'image et y réduire carrément la saturation des couleurs cyan et bleu.
Je vois que nous partageons, avec d'autres ici, le plaisir des images de qualité. Cordialement, --Cayambe (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Civray 86 St-Nicolas Archivolte Ange 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Civray 86 St-Nicolas Archivolte Scorpion 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bégonia FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Balcon Tête 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Better now. --Cayambe 19:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:Zlatopramen RadlerEdit

Hello

new version is very good! Thank you very much! I couldn't not corrected this burnt...

Best regards - Pudelek

La mare au diableEdit

Cette image m'a émue, en remuant des couches archéologiques de ma mémoire. Je suggère que tu rajoute le titre dans le scope. En plus, très bon travail photographique. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Hôtel Montalembert portail 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buisson ardent FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Chapiteau 1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Prenn 03:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charroux 86 Mascaron 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Prenn 03:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Dôme Csse d'épargne 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI to me. --Florstein 06:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Cathédrale Enfeu Aumont 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good -- George Chernilevsky 21:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Châtaignier H 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Looks good to me. --Iifar 06:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charroux 86 Chapiteau 2 Tour Ch 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --King of Hearts 18:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponds in Indre (La Mare au Diable).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Fiat L(ux)Edit

Si tu rajoute "L" au scope, çà permettra de promouvoir les autres modèles de carrosserie, qui sont eux aussi bien intéressant, la cas échéant. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Fait ! Merci (encore une fois) de ta suggestion et de ton soutien. -- Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 20:20, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Voûte Chapelle-St-André 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. Perhaps a bit underexposed--Lmbuga 21:43, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
New file uploaded. --JLPC 22:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MG TD Angoulême 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alvis Angoulême 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good technical quality. But I don't like the tarpaulin on the cockpit. -- Lothar Spurzem 23:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

CatégoriesEdit

Bonjour JLPC.

Je viens de renommer Category:Détails Architecturaux d'Angoulême en Category:Architectural elements in Angoulême, au nom plus conventionnel. Les noms de catégories ici sur Commons doivent être de préférence en anglais, et sans majuscules aux noms communs. Quand tu crées une catégorie, assure-toi que le lien ne soit pas rouge, et rattache-la à au moins 2 catégories existantes. Celles-ci forment une arborescence. Les photos ne doivent ensuite plus se retrouver dans la catégorie du dessus (voir COM:SURCAT), sauf exception, par exemple la vue d'une église de village qui a sa catégorie, mais où on voit d'autres détails intéressants du bourg.

Félicitations pour tes images de qualité ! N'hésite pas à mitrailler des églises ou châteaux près de chez toi, surtout s'ils sont monuments historiques et souvent dont les articles manquent parfois cruellement (n'oublions pas que le but de Commons est uniquement une base de données pour meubler ces articles fr, existants ou à créer). Bonne continuation, Jack ma (talk) 08:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Souci FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment one dark line on the upper right part. --Iifar 09:38, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
  Done : corrected. Hope it's better now. --JLPC 10:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC).   Support --Iifar 14:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lys blanc Fleur&bouton FR 2012rt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Imho you can add here a bit more exposure. --Iifar 09:35, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
  Done : corrected. Hope it's better now. --JLPC 10:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC). Yes, looks better. --Iifar 14:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oenothera speciosa 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 05:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phalaenopsis cultivar FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality for me. --PierreSelim 22:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Paleolithic stitching awlEdit

J'ai créée la catégorie, elle contient une catégorie qui est l’objet lui même. C'est déroutant, car à l'époque il s'agissait d'une expérimentation sur les catégorisations. Ceci n'a pas eu de suite. Car trop avant gardiste. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Échebrune 17 chapiteau 1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good to me.--Jebulon 10:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Échebrune 17 chapiteau 2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, useful.--Jebulon 10:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Abbaye la Réau Croix 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirac 16 Statue brisée-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pixellisation, trop de recherche de netteté, puis trop de débruitage, à mon avis. Je pense que c'est correctible à partir de ton fichier initial.--Jebulon 23:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
  Done ? (New file uploaded).--JLPC 21:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC) Not perfect, but better. Can pass as QI.--Jebulon 13:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rolland-Pilain vehicles (Emblems).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Rochefoucauld 16 Maison Gourville 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.... and I like plaques. --Cayambe 08:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Rochefoucauld Enseigne géomètre 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Rolland-Pilain Emblèmes 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good--Jebulon 17:07, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colocasia FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Althea FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Géomètre experts, quoique françaisEdit

Il serait peut être utile de restreindre le scope à Géomètre français car cette enseigne n'est pas universelle en dehors de notre pays. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Exact : je n'avais pas assez réfléchi au problème du scope. Je rectifie. -- Coïncidence : je vois apparaître ton message au moment où je venais de réussir mon premier "empilage", bien qu'il me reste encore un ou deux détails à régler ! -- Merci une fois de plus ! -- Bien amicalement. --JLPC (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Premier résultat avec trois clichés : ici. Encore perfectible il me semble et, de toutes façons, à suivre sur des terrains plus ardus... --JLPC

My VI candidate Ingenheim - your adviceEdit

Hi JLPC,

first: I think there is no reason to worry about yout english, IMO it is pretty good. Thank you for your advice about my VIC, I am really grateful for it. Unfortunately I still habe my problems with the VI-stuff. Best regards from Lake Constance --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 16:35, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Done (at least I hope so). Thank you very much! --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 16:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set PromotionEdit

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Fiat 514 L.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Fiat 514 L.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky talk 04:56, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Catégories (suite)Edit

Bonjour JLPC. Pour renommer des catégories, je n'ai pas trouvé de meilleure solution que de créer une au nom nouveau et d'y transvaser les photos (dans les gadgets, il y a "Cat-a-lot" qui facilite cette tâche, commande "Déplacer"), puis de faire supprimer la vide en y mettant comme seul contenu {{speedy|empty}} (si on est sûr qu'elle n'est pas employée dans aucun wiki). Sinon, j'ai enfin appris à maîtriser le redressement des perspectives (verticales), sous Photoshop, que je vais m'employer à utiliser. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Rochefoucauld 16 Chasse-roue et passage 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Même problème...--Jebulon 12:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
New file uploaded with a different processing. --JLPC 19:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC) Good now.--Jebulon 18:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirac 16 Bénitier 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirac 16 Lumière colonne 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Bien. Evocateur et poétique, en plus.--Jebulon 09:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echebrune 17 Chapiteau et pointes de diamant 2 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 08:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echebrune 17 Chapiteau et pointes de diamant 1 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 08:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Cheminée Taillefer 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 06:35, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fin septembre FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality and interesting. --Jkadavoor 05:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame d'Obezine church (Tympanum sculpture).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus automne FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. Prenn 00:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mante religieuse FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Puerta del VinoEdit

Bonsoir voisin,

Je ne comprends pas ta remarque sur mon image de la Puerta del Vino à Grenade en QI.
Pourrais-tu mettre une note pour m'orienter s'il te plaît ?
"L'ombre de gauche" correspond aux tuiles au dessus, et je n'ai rien "bidouillé" dans ce coin-là.
À te lire, bien amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Je voulais parler de la partie gauche de l'ombre qui se situe sous le porche, à l'aplomb des feuilles, entre le mur éclairé de gauche et celui près duquel un personnage est assis. Il me semble voir dans cette partie une sorte de floconnement grisâtre. Désolé d'avoir voulu trop ramasser l'expression hier soir, à la suite d'une journée chargée (!). J'ajoute une note dans la zone concernée, note facile à supprimer une fois le problème résolu. -- Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 07:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Je vois. Tu préfères un floconnement, ou un gros touriste hollandais cramoisi (pléonasme) ?   Je vais essayer de corriger ça, merci !--Jebulon (talk) 09:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Bon, j'ai essayé quelque chose. Pas parfait, mais mieux à mon avis. Peux-tu être assez aimable pour jeter à nouveau un coup d'oeil ? Merci d'avance !--Jebulon (talk) 15:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
J'ai bien sûr donné mon feu vert : il me semble qu'il est difficile de faire beaucoup mieux. J'ai moi-même passé une heure, hier après-midi, à essayer de comprendre ce qui se passait sous ce porche et à tenter d'y clarifier l'ombre (si je puis me permettre cet oxymore !). En fait, rien à faire pour ce qui me concerne, je veux dire, rien de probant... Et comme je suis persuadé qu'il ne faut pas demander aux autres plus qu'on ne peut donner, le QI s'imposait quoi qu'il arrive. -- Bien amicalement. JLPC (talk) 17:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
J'ai zigouillé des touristes, et je n'ai fait que copier l'ombre existant déja. Je te remercie pour la promotion, mais tu sais, ça n'est jamais obligatoire! Si tu l'sens pas, tu l'sens pas !--Jebulon (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Eglise Villars-en-ponsEdit

Hello and thank you for the message. The photo is definitely still a QI for me. Cheers! Óðinn (talk) 05:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Surveying (French sign).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de Dirac (Charente) (Facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Villars-en-pons.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Óðinn 04:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Egl Obézine Fronton 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, although it is a bit soft --Poco a poco 08:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontdouce 17 Salle capitulaire 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good picture -- Lothar Spurzem 21:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontdouce 17 Salle capitulaire détail 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 21:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Boisseaux chargement 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. --Cayambe 08:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Reflet vitraux DiracEdit

Bonjour JLPC,
C'est marrant, ta photo. Elle me rappelle qu'à mes débuts, j'avais tenté [1] quelque chose de similaire, mais sans succès: même pas QI , sniff...
Ils ne sont pas prêts...

--Jebulon (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontdouce 17 Fontaine 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Really good composition and QI to me. The tower on the left seems slightly tilted, but is IMO still OK. The crop on the bottom makes the picture - to me - more interesting. --DKrieger 22:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontdouce 17 chapelles 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Qi to me, and an impressive picture besides --DKrieger 22:34, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-félix 16 Tombe J.A. Cros 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Maybe a bit soft, but very good compo and light.--Jebulon 10:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Villars-en-Pons (France) (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cheminée du Palais Taillefer (Angoulême, France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anémone Japon rose&fruits FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asters FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 18:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Félix 16 Chapiteau 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, très bien. --Cayambe 15:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Egl Obézine NW 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 14:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbey of Fontdouce (France) (Chapter house).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Commons:Valued images/Recently promotedEdit

Hello,

In which category would you add your picture? Regards, Yann (talk) 06:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour, et désolé de n'avoir pas été plus clair. Il s'agit d'ajouter une catégorie avec le VI categorization tool dans la page ci-dessus. Yann (talk) 07:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raisin d'Amérique FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomise FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonneuil 16 Carrefour Bellevue 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 09:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouteville 16 Gratte-pieds église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Maison redresséeEdit

Bonjour JLPC,

merci beaucoup pour tes remarques, il est vrai que la rue tout comme la porte Renaissance sont très anciennes mais l'inclinaison de la rue et l'usure des vieilles pierres ont perturbé mon sens de l'équilibre... Je viens donc de téléverser deux nouvelles versions de ces photos, corrigées avec justesse je l'espère. Bravo à toi pour ton corpus de photos, très intéressant et toujours de qualité. Bonne continuation & à bientôt!

--Selbymay (talk) 10:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blanzac 16 église porte sud 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Selbymay 06:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blanzac 16 tympan 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good crop and quality. --Selbymay 06:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Châteauneuf 16 Chapiteau&frise b 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. --Bgag 11:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Châteauneuf 16 Chapiteau&frise 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality et valuedEdit

Bonjour JLPC. Je n'y comprends plus rien car il y a Category:Quality images of Charente et Category:Valued images of Poitou-Charentes; ce n'est pas la même chose ? Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 08:50, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de La Roche, Magné (Vienne).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle monolithe de Gurat, Charente (Interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scots crown post boxes (Isle of Skye).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac Blanc, Hautes-Pyrénées (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rose trémière 2 FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:21, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montmoreau 16 Pont enneigé 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:01, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plassac-Rouffiac église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angoulême Chasse-roue métallique 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 05:48, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arbre de Judée FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Iifar 15:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Col d'Aspin (versant sud-est).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Civray 86 Porte Hôt LXIII 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rochechouart 87 MonumM Allégorie 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharp and good crop. --Selbymay 07:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noyer feuilles&fruits été FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. - A.Savin 22:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pérignac Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. --Cayambe 07:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalais 16 Plaque Chpelle ND 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Balzacien... J'adore "Euphrosine"!--Jebulon 16:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charroux 86 Portail de l'église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice detail.--Jebulon 16:36, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peugeot Partner PN des Pyrénées Barèges 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renault Kangoo La Poste Civray 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 16:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Pierre (Châteauneuf-sur-Charente) (portal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dinan 21 Cartes postales 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bourcefranc 17 R.Trémières 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
"Bourcefranc", mais QI quand même ! ;)--Jebulon 22:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Where is the binomial id of the plant? --Coyau 22:55, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
@ J : Mistake corrected. Sorry for the natives of C.-M.! --JLPC 09:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC) --Jebulon 11:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin-l'Ars 86 Abbaye la Réau Vue SW 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment perspective correction needed for me --Rjcastillo 01:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
  Done Is it better now ? --JLPC 08:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)   Support Good sharpness and light --Iifar 13:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fouquebrune 16 Chassagne 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Iifar 13:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barèges 65 Garages 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pivoine FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Prenn 04:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rose FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capucine FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI now to me. --Cayambe 10:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

COM:QICEdit

Hello!

I have just undid this edit by you. You have nearly blanked the hole page. Please feel free to re-promote the image which was lost during my re-installation of the page. Please be more careful with this page in the future. Thanks in advance. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournesols&ciel FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice colors! --Poco a poco 03:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scabieuses FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Really nice --Poco a poco 03:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pied d'alouette FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cosmos 2 FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angoulême Town hall (SW view) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris AlexandreIII Fillette coquille&cadenas 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. --Selbymay 07:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac de Dera Yunco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Porte cochère rue La Bruyère 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice, and QI to me --DKrieger 18:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Bicyclette VIIIe arr. 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 17:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Orsay Cheval Rouillard 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 17:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blanzay 86 Église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 18:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blanzay 86 Croix église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Crs la Reine Bolivar 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 13:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Romagne 86 Portail atelier 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Rare view, good quality. --Selbymay 19:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: File:Universidad de Tallin, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 05.JPGEdit

Dear JLPC, I answered on my page, thanks and best regards, Poco a poco (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "JLPC/Archive 3".