Keren - WMIL
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Malformed deletion requests
editHi, you're making deletion requests which mix templates and create problems which have to be cleaned up. Please only use one of {{Delete}} or {{Copyvio}}. If you use automated tools for listing these, don't include any such template. Guanaco (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Guanaco. I was following the instruction according to Commons:Deletion_policy#Copyright_violation. Keren - WMIL (talk) 09:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, I'll have to take a look at that page and clarify the instructions. For obvious copyvios like these you can either add the {{Copyvio}} template directly or use the "Report copyright violation" tool. Guanaco (talk) 09:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- As Guanaco says, please only use {{Delete}} or {{Copyvio}}. You never need to use a template in a rationale, either. I'm pretty sure the instructions never tell you to do both, but if you point out the bit that confused you, we will correct it. Thanks for your understanding, Storkk (talk) 10:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Storkk, Take a look at Commons:Deletion_policy#Copyright_violation and you will see it says " Use {{copyvio|1=Reason}} or {{copyvio|source=URL}} to explain why it’s a copyright violation". If that isn't confusing I don't know what is. In any case, I now changed my preferences such that I have the "Report copyright violation" option in the sidebar menu. I saw a suggestion that this option will be the default and I can certainly second that suggestion. Keren - WMIL (talk) 11:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, if it's an obvious copyright violation, you should definitely use {{Copyvio}}. You should not also use {{Delete}}. Does that clear things up? Storkk (talk) 11:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Storkk It doesn't actually, because I didn't use {{Delete}}. I clicked on "Nominate for deletion" and put {{copyvio|source=URL}} in the dialogue box. Any {{Delete}} that was used must be a result of the script that is run. Keren - WMIL (talk) 12:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- OK—I understand now, thanks. Perhaps it is not clear enough that clicking "Nominate for deletion" performs a regular deletion, and that no templates are needed in the rationale. Storkk (talk) 12:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Storkk It doesn't actually, because I didn't use {{Delete}}. I clicked on "Nominate for deletion" and put {{copyvio|source=URL}} in the dialogue box. Any {{Delete}} that was used must be a result of the script that is run. Keren - WMIL (talk) 12:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, if it's an obvious copyright violation, you should definitely use {{Copyvio}}. You should not also use {{Delete}}. Does that clear things up? Storkk (talk) 11:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Storkk, Take a look at Commons:Deletion_policy#Copyright_violation and you will see it says " Use {{copyvio|1=Reason}} or {{copyvio|source=URL}} to explain why it’s a copyright violation". If that isn't confusing I don't know what is. In any case, I now changed my preferences such that I have the "Report copyright violation" option in the sidebar menu. I saw a suggestion that this option will be the default and I can certainly second that suggestion. Keren - WMIL (talk) 11:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
תמונה במונחון
editשלום,
בדף Wikidata:Glossary/he יש תמונה שאת רשומה בתור היוצרת שלה. יש בתמונה בעיות במינוח:
- qualifiers – תמיד קראו להם בעברית „מבחינים” ולא „מגדירים”.
- statements – תמיד קראו להם בעברית „קביעות” ולא „הצהרות”. (אפילו רואים את זה בתמונה עצמה.)
תוכלי לתקן את זה, בבקשה?
יהיה נחמד גם לתקן את הכיוון, שייראה כמו שזה באמת נראה מימין לשמאל.
מומלץ לענות לפני תג div. סליחה על האי־נוחות.