Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KshitizBathwal!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Overcategorizing edit

Hello KshitizBathwal,

welcome, and thanks for your uploads. Please pay attention to the way we categorize images: categories are not tags, and your uploads are definitely ovecategorized. Let me know if you have any questions. Again, welcome! -- Ariadacapo (talk) 07:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ariadacapo (talk) 07:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Ariadacapo: Hi, it looks like you’ve nominated images uploaded by User:KshitizBathwal as they aren’t processed with OTRS. But those images are completely owned by the uploader. The possibility of clowning an image from Instagram with Meta data and original quality is zero. This process will further decrease the interest in new contributors.—IM3847 (talk) 07:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
@IM3847: Continuing this discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by KshitizBathwal -- Ariadacapo (talk)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MIT Student Plaza .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 13:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MIT Academic Block 1 - Quadrangle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Purple (and some green) CAs at many countours. Could you fix that? Thanks! --Aristeas 07:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Aristeas: Changed the saturation of the image, can you please help me in finding further changes to be made --IM3847 16:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Support Thank you! IMHO the colours look much more natural now and the CAs are mostly fixed. It is still a pity that the buildings at the right are rather unsharp, but IMHO we should not be picky here as this (degrading sharpness at the borders) is a common problem with drone photos. So IMHO the image is quite good now (technically) and definitely a great view of the building (esthetically). --Aristeas 10:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please use sub-categories edit

dansk | Deutsch | Österreichisches Deutsch | Schweizer Hochdeutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | svenska | +/−


 
 
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

(and thanks and congratulations for the beautiful photos) -- Ariadacapo (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapu Beach Lighthouse .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Malachi Bissette General Store Ledger 1928 - DPLA - d31693da356bac4c029b320906be8c9f (page 187).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KshitizBathwal (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Malachi Bissette General Store Ledger 1928 - DPLA - d31693da356bac4c029b320906be8c9f (page 187).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KshitizBathwal (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

@KshitizBathwal: Since you're a new Wikimedian and assuming this is your first nomination. I would suggest you to read the criteria for deletion at Commons:Deletion policy. --IM3847 (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
This was created on an error. Can someone please close the deletion request.--106.51.78.92 18:44, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malpe Sea Walk Aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malpe Beach Aerial view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality, works for me. --S.Hinakawa 19:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply