Leahoswald

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Leahoswald!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Your edits

Hi, do not remove licenses and Flickr review templates. Jcb (talk) 21:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

I've corrected them so they reference the right flickr account. Before the review template was fully broken and referenced a non exiting account. As I'm the author of these images I think this is absolutely ok. But after your Change, all the references are going to a wrong account name. I really don't know what is broken there but please fix it again so it references the correct Account as needed by the license!Leah Oswald (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

All files at Commons must have a license and the review template proves that the file was available under that license at the moment of review at the given location. You can't touch that. Jcb (talk) 15:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Maybe it is better to remove the images at all (and maybe reupload them) if this is the case and there is now way of a correct attribution. Things go wrong or change, even Commons has to honor that. Leah Oswald (talk) 16:15, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

It's the other way round, the review templates are in place to make sure that we don't need to remove the files if the author changes his mind. Jcb (talk) 16:34, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok, let me explain the thing. I really don't want to see the reference to a deadname here. I'm totally okay with the images and that they are added to the Commons. I'v even touched every single image and updated the license information to reference the current location and the correct account. I don't get the problem. Why is it impossible to do another (automated) review of the new correct data? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leahoswald (talk • contribs) 16:55, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

It would be great if you could respond. Leah Oswald (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

It's our established process. Please just leave the links and tags alone and everything will be fine. Jcb (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Not for me. I think then there is no way to avoid a legal request via GDPR. Leah Oswald (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

That would be a waste of your time, because there is no legal ground for your request. Jcb (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Let that be my problem. Leah Oswald (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)