User talk:Maksimsokolov/Archive 1

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Windows of former Seagram Distillers Building (Seagram Lofts, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Windows of former Seagram Distillers Building (Seagram Lofts, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:A girl resting in shade during the summer heat.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A girl resting in shade during the summer heat.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Nice to get a sort of ally here. I'm usually considered "the crazy one" here since I tend to see things a bit different from the rest of FPC-ers. Welcome! Cart (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Windows of the Frost Building (Toronto, Canada).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Windows of the Frost Building (Toronto, Canada).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Hostile comments and false accusations are not valid on this project

Hi,

This link you add is inappropriate and doesn't respect COM:CIVIL. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

@Basile Morin: How is this inappropriate link? How is my message hostile? Who did I accuse? These are rhetorical questions, I don't need answers. I showed the link as an example of what happens when fascism is not stopped and that in WWII it was not possible to stop fascism without using force. Anyone who will read my comments carefully will see what my point was. In any case, I will no longer participate in FPC. I do not except this treatment. Farewell. Stay safe. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 02:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

You can't write "Would you stop this" and link this text to a crematorium. You can't say "I bet you would use any weapon you had at your disposal" as if this behaviour was a natural thing.

Please respect our policies and avoid defamatory or inflammatory allegations -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

@Basile Morin: I write now to make sure no misunderstanding is left in the records. You cited me incompletely. My message was: "Would you stop <crematoriums - image was inserted here> with kind language and pleas to those who do this?" Which means: "Would you stop genocide with no forceful resistance and kindness?" And also, when you are attacked and your family is in imminent danger, of course, using any weapon at your disposal to protect yourself is a natural thing. I think you have reacted wrongly and misinterpreted my messages. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 03:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Using weapons is not the intuitive solution of every humans on this planet, fortunately.

But the discussion is not about how we would react individually in such circunstances, but more about the technical aspects of the candidature, in relation to the subjective feelings -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

• It's ok. Maybe someone in the community will care to read all our correspondence carefully. If so, they will find that you have put your accusation in my violation of civility wrongly. There is nowhere in my messages any uncivilized behaviour and any false accusation of anyone. But, of course, to see this, it is necessary to read our discussion. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 04:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

• Take a step back and meditate our policies and essays may relax you too. COM:MELLOW 🕊️ -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The CN Tower and 315 Front Street West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal of St. Andrew's Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A view from the Centennial Ridges Trail in Algonquin Provincial Park (Ontario, Canada).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A small lake in Algonquin Provincial Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram 501 on McCaul street, Toronto, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aura skyscraper in Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scotia Bank Plaza as seen from Toronto Dominion Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inuksuk at Waterdown, Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scenery from the lookout of Centennial Ridges Trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The image could be sharper. --XRay 04:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reflection of the heart poster in the windows of Ontario Institute of Cancer Research.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Categorization could be better. --XRay 03:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)  Comment More categories added, thank you --Maksimsokolov 14:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University College Portal (University of Toronto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A view of CN Tower from the University of Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is leaning in. --XRay 04:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)  Done Thank you. Perspective corrected --Maksimsokolov 18:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. Next time please add the EXIF data. Thank you. --XRay 04:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Toronto Inukshuk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Thunderbird parked on University Avenue in Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tilley Hats and Silence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 13:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A girl resting in shade during the summer heat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of the Frost Building (Toronto, Canada).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 13:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Head of the ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotels at Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of former Seagram Distillers Building (Seagram Lofts, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tatzu Nishi - temporary installation in Toronto entitled “Life’s Little Worries of Sir Adam Beck” (2018)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Fine, but there is no way in the world that this photo could stand for the entire vast supercategory of "Modern art". Please read through the Commons:Valued image scope page and then ask questions if you're in doubt about what suitable scope you could use for this photo, but you're also going to need to search for relevant categories. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done Thank you, scope fixed --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 13:18, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Modern art to Modern art in Canada - temporary installation in Toronto by Tatzu Nishi entitled “Life’s Little Worries of Sir Adam Beck” (2018). --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 13:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment There is a Category:Tatzu Nishi, which is much more specific and therefore much better for you to link to in the scope. Try to find the most specific category possible for all of your nominations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Thank you Ikan. I have changed the scope once again. Your advise is very valuable. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 00:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Modern art in Canada - temporary installation in Toronto by Tatzu Nishi entitled “Life’s Little Worries of Sir Adam Beck” (2018) to Tatzu Nishi - temporary installation in Toronto entitled “Life’s Little Worries of Sir Adam Beck” (2018) --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 00:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Useful. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:08, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancient Egyptian daggers - Dagger with cartouche of Ahmose at Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto (c. 1560 BC).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The quality is sufficient to be promoted in VI but there is a need for a single scope which serves as a referance with a link to the category. Take a look at how the scopes that are in the competition were made. The object is very interesting. For this type of object you need its name and also the place of exhibition here the name of the museum is sufficient.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
•  DoneThank you a lot for the feedback. Scope fixed --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 13:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Ancient Egyptian daggers to Ancient Egyptian daggers - Dagger with cartouche of Ahmose at Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto (c. 1560 BC) --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 13:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancient Egyptian reliefs in Canada - Relief with grape vines (c. 1352-1327 BC, Museum Object Number: 962.57).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

The scope is too imprecise there are thousands of relief fragments from this period. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Egyptian antiquities in the Royal Ontario Museum - Relief from Amarna Period (c. 1350BC) to Ancient Egyptian reliefs in Canada - Amarna Period (c. 1350BC) --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 22:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

@Archaeodontosaurus: Maybe this scope is better? Thank you.--Maksim Sokolov (talk). 22:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

• You turn around the problem without solving it. In fact a good solution to characterize in a sure way the piece, it is enough to give its reference number of the Museum. Take an example from the name I made this morning for Tarcisius --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Ancient Egyptian reliefs in Canada - Amarna Period (c. 1350BC) to Ancient Egyptian reliefs in Canada - Relief with grape vines (c. 1352-1327 BC, Museum Object Number: 962.57) --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

@Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you. I have added more specifics in the scope. Also, more details here.--Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Geocoding is missing --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done @Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you. Geocodes entered.--Maksim Sokolov (talk). 18:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Mary Pickford on University Avenue in Toronto (by Eino Gira, 1983).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good news there is no copyright for your photo. but you must in the scope give the title of the work, the name of the author and the place where it is located. --

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Scope fixed, thank you for the feedback --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 13:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Mary Pickford in art to Mary Pickford in art - Bust of Mary Pickford on University Avenue in Toronto (by Eino Gira, 1983) --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 13:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11-volume set of "Story of Civilization" by Will and Ariel Durant (edition of 1963 - 1975).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This is a comment for your nominations in general: Please connect your scope with the appropriate Commons category the way you can see in other nominations if you look at them in edit mode, and please pick a specific enough scope. "Books about history" is an easy decline because there's no way in the world that a single set of books could represent such a broad category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Done Thank you a lot Ikan. I am new in VI, still learning.--Maksim Sokolov (talk). 13:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Books about history to Covers of books about history - 11 volume set of "Story of Civilization" by Will and Ariel Durant --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 13:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment I don't think the category you're linking is useful, as covers of books about history aren't recognizably different from covers of various other types of books. Can you find a more specific category to link to? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Covers of books about history - 11 volume set of "Story of Civilization" by Will and Ariel Durant to Will Durant - 11 volume set of "Story of Civilization" by Will and Ariel Durant --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 00:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

@Ikan Kekek: Thank you Ikan. Let's try a more specific "Will Durant", which however does not capture the coauthor Ariel Durant. Still it is more specific then Books about history --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 00:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

• OK, this is getting better. I think I'd use the format "11 volume set of "Story of Civilization" by Will and Ariel Durant". But what edition is this, such that the appearances of the covers are important? I don't mean to unduly nitpick: It doesn't have to be a first edition to be important enough for promotion, but since the look of the covers is likely to vary between editions, it may need to be specified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Will Durant - 11 volume set of "Story of Civilization" by Will and Ariel Durant to 11 volume set of "Story of Civilization" by Will and Ariel Durant (edition of 1963 - 1975)--Maksim Sokolov (talk). 02:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC) {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

@Ikan Kekek: Thank you Ikan. You made it much clearer for me and I am very grateful for you time. This is 1963-1975 edition, a very rare one. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 02:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. Thanks for working with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aura (at College Park) in April 2021.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose geocoding is missing in the caption --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done @Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you. Geocodes entered. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sitting statue of Northrop Frye at the University of Toronto at its original location (artists: Darren Byers and Fred Harrison, unveiled 2012).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful per reason above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
• Good but geocoding is missing in the caption --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I know, but the sculpture is no longer at that location, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done @Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you. Geocodes entered. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of University College, Toronto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Could have wider crops but best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of St. Andrew's Church, Toronto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Almost perfect: geocoding is missing in the caption --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done @Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you. Geocodes entered. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Presbyterian Church and Grand River (Galt, Ontario, Canada).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, nice view. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 18:38, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A girl standing in the rain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate, Guelph - Frontal view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 00:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate, Guelph - Fragment of the portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate, Guelph - the mosaic of the portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate, Guelph - Rose Window of the Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose window of Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate, Guelph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of Our Lady Immaculate, Guelph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I have fixed the scope. Beautiful building! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ontario Police Memorial Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John P. Robarts Research Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of Yorkminster Park Baptist Church (Toronto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 09:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of Yorkminster Park Baptist Church in Monochrome (Toronto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity College Window in Monochrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soldier's Tower Window in Monochrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity College Window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soldiers' Tower - Upper Window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soldiers' Tower - Lower Window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sharp Centre for Design - fragment of facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Quite a special motif, could be FP IMO. Geocoding would be nice. --Palauenc05 17:42, 14 May 2021 (UTC) @Palauenc05: Thanks a lot for your feedback. Geocodes added. Please feel free to nominate for FP (or anyone who might care to do so) --Maksimsokolov 01:06, 15 May 2021 (UTC)  Done @ Maksimsokolov: cast your vote, if you like it. --Palauenc05 11:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC) @Palauenc05: Thanks a lot for nominating the image! I will let the community at FPC decide if it is worth being an FP. As the author I will abstain from voting though. --Maksimsokolov 18:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sharp Centre for Design - fragment of facade.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sharp Centre for Design - fragment of facade.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queen's Park Entrance of the Royal Ontario Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:27, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The main pod of the CN Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fragment of the name wall of the Ireland Park, Toronto, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Woman on Ground.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toronto skyline viewed from Trillium Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Music Garden, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A fragment of the name wall of the Ireland Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Face of the Apprehensive Man.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jonadrews 20:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The CN Tower and The Jubilant Man.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting exposure, and good quality for me --Domob 11:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Apprehensive Man.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 11:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of the Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of Hilton Hotel in Downtown Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of Knox College, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The 3rd Generation Corvette Stingray.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Lens question

Hello Maksim,

I have a stupid question about the lens you have used for this (very beautiful!) photo and others: The EXIF data say “E 28-75mm F2.8-2.8”, but AFAIK there is no lens with that name. Is this the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD lens? Thank you very much for your help!

(If you wonder why I ask: I am just curious about good lenses for Sony E-Mount, because I use an E-Mount camera myself, and therefore I wanted to ask you which lens you have used here. ;–)

Best regards, --Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

@Aristeas:

Hello Roman,

Nice to hear from you! You are correct, this is Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD lens. I am quite happy with it: it is light, and optically good lens. And not expensive too.

Cheers,

Maksim Sokolov (talk). 11:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Maksim,

thank you very much for your answer! That’s good to know – your photos taken with that zoom are amazing, so the Tamron is really a good choice for a standard zoom. Sometimes I am also asked by friends which lenses I would recommend to them, so now I know another good option.

Let me take the opportunity to mention that I really like your architecture photos, especially the minimalist ones! I am mostly doing architecture (and landscape) photos myself, but often I find myself doing this in a rather conventional way (either total views or details), so it is refreshing for me to see the perspectives you take, often pointing out parts or structures which are overlooked by others.

All the best, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 13:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

@Aristeas: Thank you for the kind feedback Roman! In turn, I find your photos very clean, balanced and very well composed. Pleasure to look at! --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 17:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of Toronto Reference Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Would be good in black-and-white too.) --XRay 03:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC) @XRay: Thank you. Yes, BW is coming too --Maksimsokolov 04:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rainbow Above Horseshoe Falls (Niagara Falls).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of Toronto Reference Library (monochrome version).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horseshoe Falls (Niagara Falls).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:50, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benches at Oakes Garden Theatre, Niagara Falls, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window of Knox College, Toronto (monochrome version).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fragment of facade of Jackman Law Building, University of Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling of the passageway under South Wing of Toronto Courthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A closeup view of the 3rd generation Corvette Stingray.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments <strikethrough>Imo the detail is lost with the excessive added contrast. The image is b/w, yet there are some green tints on the left.</strikethrough> --Nefronus 18:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC) @Nefronus: Thank you. The green tint removed. High contrast is a deliberate artistic choice. Maksimsokolov 15:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC) *  Comment Better so I delete my oppose, but I will let others decide. Nefronus 17:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)  Support IMO a good black-and-white QI image. Black-and-white is a good choice for this picture. --XRay 08:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

FP nomination

Nominated

Hello Maksim,

I have taken the freedom to nominate your photo on the Featured picture candidates page; I was blown away when I saw it on the Quality images candidates page. I hope that the nomination will be successful; I did my best to describe in short words why the photo is (IMHO) great; but I cannot guarantee how the discussion will go ;–).

All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@Aristeas: Thank you Roman for your kind words and for nominating the image! Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@Maksimsokolov: You are welcome! By the way: you can vote for your photo in the nomination ;–). Most people do so, it is not considered as vanity, but as a sign that you stand by your photo. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

@Aristeas: Thank you a lot Roman! I took it as a rule to abstain from voting for my own work, and I let the community of FPC decide what is worth being the FP. Besides, after an incident that happened once, I was disappointed with the ways things work at FPC and decided not to participate in FPC in any way so not to involve myself in possible toxic and unreasonable discussions (I do not know how to link part of the text, but somewhere in the beginning of this talk page, there is my correspondence about this). As in any society there are a lot of truly kind and reasonable people there though (you are one of those of course). If my image gets nominated for FP by another participant, let it be --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

@Maksimsokolov: After reading that discussion I understand your position, Maksim, and I have the highest respect for your reasons. Yes, sometimes the FPC discussion becomes toxic, that’s really bad; and things have not improved lately, on the contrary, recently we had several problematic controversies (the reasons were different, but the consequence is still that the discussion becomes injuring). With this in mind, I would like to thank you all the more that you still share your inspiring photos with us here, and that I can nominate your great photo. All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 14:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

@Aristeas: Thank you Roman, I appreciate your support! Using this chance I also wanted to ask you if you know - is there any tutorial how to collapse and organize the talk page into archives? --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 15:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

@Maksimsokolov: About archiving: There are bots which do the archiving for you automatically once you have added the necessary setup information to your talk page. I did this once for my own talk page, but found the documentation a bit confusion at that time, to be honest ;–). But the process has been simplified in between: Here is a shortcut for setting up a default archiving process; basically just place {{subst:User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and save it. I would just try that. The full documentation is here. You can also have a look at the configuration on my talk page (just click “Edit”, the two configuration templates are right at the top). Hope it helps, --Aristeas (talk) 17:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

@Aristeas: Thanks a lot Roman, it looks like I could make the archive in a very simple way you suggested. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 18:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of Toronto City Hall (close-up).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of Toronto City Hall (Close-up, Monochrome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A fragment of the roof structure of the Art Gallery of Ontario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMO, a good implementation in black-and-white with an abstract structure. Unusual, but good. --XRay 04:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Side portal of Trinity College, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of the Frost Building (Toronto, Canada) in monochrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, very impressive. --Aristeas 07:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of Toronto City Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows of Toronto City Hall (Monochrome).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Extreme contrast, but in B&W this is legitimate. --Aristeas 08:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 June 2021 (UTC)