User talk:Poco a poco/2016-06

Latest comment: 7 years ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roca de la Ley, Parque Nacional de Þingvellir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres del Tatio, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 51-53 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 10:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 10:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments despite the real angle of 22mm it´s acceptable. --Hubertl 07:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MartinThoma 04:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. FP! --Martin Falbisoner 07:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 128.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 03-07 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitad del Mundo, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Collahuasi, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too much water in relation to the sky, imo --A.Savin 04:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)   Support In my opinion the composition is ok. --Milseburg 14:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 113.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Águila real (Aquila chrysaetos), Arcos de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 64.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Hedionda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 61.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Hedionda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 61.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Géiseres del Tatio, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 73.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! --DarwIn 19:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giralda, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 85.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cementerio de la salitrera Rica Aventura, María Elena, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 131.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedrales de Tara, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cerro del Azufre, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --DarwIn 19:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support OK. --C messier 09:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Paredones, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support OK. --C messier 08:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lobo marino (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support A bit noisy, but OK for me. --C messier 08:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 12-14 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --DarwIn 19:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Colón, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 81.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --DarwIn 19:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento de bienvenida, Gibraltar, 2015-12-09, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento al Dakar, Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --DarwIn 19:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de la Asunción, Arcos de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Oppose too strong distortrd. --Ralf Roletschek 00:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Will work on it later Poco a poco 04:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
  New version Poco a poco 20:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
  Support QI for me (amybe a bit too dark). --C messier 06:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)QI now. --Ralf Roletschek 16:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Request

Hello, can you help me to remove this file? Alaa Najjar :)..! 21:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Alaa Najjar I am sorry, but I am afraid that the reason for the deletion is not acceptable. You can just overwrite the file if you upload a version with more resolution, otherwise, please, use a different name to upload a new file. As you uploaded the current file last year and could be easily and referenced from outside Wikimedia it shouldn't be deleted. Poco2 22:09, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento al Dakar, Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a la Constitución de 1812, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 80.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Moncayo, España, 2012-08-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monreal de Ariza, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monjes de la Pacana, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Gracias

…por tus elogios, aunque, entre otras insuficiencias, tengo mi sistema sin calibrar y a menudo corrijo mal el equilibrio de color y la distribución tonal. Me satisface mucho hacer fotos documentales, y también subirlas a un depósito donde cualquiera puede usarlas. Cuando aumentó mi carga de trabajo, interrumpí mi colaboración con es:wikipedia (con otra identidad), pero nunca he abandonado del todo Commons. Como éste debe ser mi último curso, espero intensificar mi relación con ambos proyectos, y estaré encantado de colaborar en lo que esté a mi alcance. --Luis Fernández García (talk) 09:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Perdona Luis por no escribirte antes, estoy de vacaciones. Muchas gracias por ofrecer tu tiempo a este proyecto y sobre todo a los wikimedistas españoles! Para ir calentando motores, ¿alguna idea de lo que puede ser esto. En caso de duda Lucas podría aportar más datos (ubicación, por ejemplo)? Poco2 11:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Buenas Luis, estaba buscando la foto que dice Diego, y he llegado a una Tolpis Barbata, que opinas? Gracias. --Harpagornis (talk) 11:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Yo también diría que es Tolpis barbata. Pero no debéis sobrevalorar mi habilidad para identificar taxones, lo que pasa es que sólo subo las imágenes después de haber llegado a alguna conclusión, aunque sea errónea. Tengo muchas fotos esperando que aparezca el tiempo, creo que ahora tendré más, para intentar ponerles nombre.
Por otro lado estoy de acuerdo en que en las fotos de tema naturalístico los datos de localidad y ambiente añaden mucho valor; en las fotos no están casi nunca reconocibles los caracteres que permitirían una identificación rigurosa, con clave, cuando además las claves no suelen estar al alcance de los aficionados. Con la localidad se puede descartar muchas hipótesis, usando por ejemplo, para plantas, los mapas de Anthos, y estrechar la búsqueda. En este caso se puede apreciar a ojo que es «una achicoria» (Cichoriinae), y comprobar enseguida que no hay más opciones en Galicia, si es que es de Galicia. Creo que se podría promover de alguna manera que los usuarios que suben plantas, animales, rocas y otros temas así, se hagan conscientes de la utilidad de esa información. Una de las cosas que quiero hacer es georreferenciar las fotos que he ido subiendo sin coordenadas, que son la mayoría. Saludos. --Luis Fernández García (talk) 18:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Gracias Luis, y sí, está claro que contando con esa información a la hora de identificar especies la tarea sería otra. Poco2 21:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Bronze Barnstar „Wiki Loves Earth 2016 Bulgaria“

File:Wozzy-gives-bronze-barnstar.jpg
Wozzy congratulates you!

Hello, Poco a poco!

For your 25+ images uploaded so far in the "Wiki Loves Earth 2016 Bulgaria" photo contest, please accept this small bronze WLE-barnstar, with our wishes for good luck in the competition! We expect more photos from you and are happy with each and every of them!

Spiritia 15:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, User:Spiritia, for the gift :) I was wondering whether you, as part of the organisation team, can help me with this issue about the Stone Forest id. Best, Poco2 19:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


Just a heads-up on the Stone Forest/Побити камъни issue. The upload is fine as it is. There's no problem in uploading an image with a simple description of the protected site. There's a ton of protected areas in the country and listing them all is just too much. That said, I've now added Pobiti Kamani to the list of sites of Wiki Loves Earth. It is under the id ZM167. Thanks again for the great contribution. --Laveol (talk) 08:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Laveol Poco2 05:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Laveol: Done, I just replaced all files Poco2 09:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monjes de la Pacana, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 49-51 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 01:20, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 61-63 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monreal de Ariza, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosaico del Planetario, ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The shadow seems to be unavoidable. --Smial 09:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gran Casino, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo, good composition, sharp enough, sky well done. Only the bottom crop is quiet tight (look to the lantern) --Michielverbeek 09:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muralla árabe, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Bravo! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Bravo! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lobo marino (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki), isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Bachas, isla Baltra, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Very special colors.Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 69-71 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 69-71 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 15-21 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 15-21 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Photo requests in Ecuador

Hi! Do you do photo requests in Quito? There are some school buildings which I would like to have photographed.

Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 05:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi WhisperToMe, no, sorry, I don't. I was only once there for vacation Poco2 17:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice shot + light. I would apply moderate NR on the darker parts of the sky. Nonetheless QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo de la Cruz, Ruse, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 11-13 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Dormición de la Madre de Dios, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 109-111 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabo de Kaliakra, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, but further underexposure (and later brightening of the darker parts) had preserved more structure of the stone wall. --Tuxyso 19:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Dormición de la Madre de Dios, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 112-114 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, despite difficult lighting conditions. --Peulle 13:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salida del lago de Varna al mar Negro, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 118-120 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transporte por cable de minerales, Devnya, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Nice composition--Lmbuga 15:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Email

Hi Diego, I've sent you an email! Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 23:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo de la Cruz, Ruse, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 18:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Ivanovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezquita Ahmet Bey, Razgrad, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezquita Ahmet Bey, Razgrad, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabo de Kaliakra, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salida del lago de Varna al mar Negro, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)



català | English | español | euskara | galego | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Earth 2016!

Dear Poco a poco,

On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia Spain, organizer of the Spanish edition of Wiki Loves Earth 2016, we want to say thank you for your participation, and especially for contributing your pictures to the free knowledge. Due to the participation of people like you, the contest has gathered thousands of pictures of natural heritage sites from 17 countries. The contest in other countries is still open.

You can find all your uploaded pictures in this category, and you are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and hence help to develop Wikimedia Commons. Wiki Loves Monuments and Wiki Loves Folk are just around the corner.

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. English speaking Commons community meets in the Village Pump.

You are more than welcome to leave us a comment, suggestion or question. You can post them here.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Earth team
 

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 127.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 81-83 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 15-17 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Dormición de la Madre de Dios, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo de la Cruz, Ruse, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 18:39, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 73.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 73.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 114.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, interesting motive. --Tuxyso 19:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento Neptuno, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The clouds at the top right look nearly overexposed (or retouched). Still QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro, Valle de la Luna, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 149.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 09-12 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting --Moroder 15:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cueva Grande, reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 46-49 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Hedionda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:13, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, excellent perspective, sharp in the front but why did not you reduce the contrast --Michielverbeek 20:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Tres Marías, Valle de la Luna, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 157.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Honda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Honda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. --MartinThoma 08:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Tebinquinche, desierto de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Peulle 10:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 34-36 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. --Rbrechko 10:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitad del Mundo, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monjes de la Pacana, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monjes de la Pacana, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. --MartinThoma 08:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Nuestra Señora de Rueda, Sástago, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 51.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Wirklich sehr gut! --Hubertl 09:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitad del Mundo, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments As to the dark side, but good for me.--Famberhorst 15:39, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. :-) --XRay 16:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Dormición de la Madre de Dios, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 32.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 32.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Elche desde la torre de la Basílica de Santa María, España, 2014-07-05, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle del Colca, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 64.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle Arcoiris, Río Grande, Chile, 2016-02-05, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de la Luna, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 152.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 19-21 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 103.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very special lighting with rather low contrast, but ok as is. --Smial 13:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monjes de la Pacana, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 58-60 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muro del Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 62.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Bahía Tortuga, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ollagüe, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 77.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Rohdaten sind im Quelltext angehaengt (gleiches Format jahr,monat,promoted,declined,unevaluated,discuss). Da sind ein paar interessante plots rauszuholen. Z.B. sind die unevaluierten Bilder deutlich zurueck gegangen. Irgendetwas laeuft da richtig :-) --Dschwen (talk) 13:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 37-39 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 11:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monjes de la Pacana, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MartinThoma 08:26, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MartinThoma 08:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 24-26 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. :-) --XRay 11:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Valahnukur pics

Hi, Diego. I noticed one of your pictures of Valahnukur was just made a Quality Image. But which one is your favorite? My favorite is this one, but do you think it's blown or posterized anywhere (I don't notice anything like that, but sometimes I miss those things), and is the spot to the left of the far rock a dust spot or a little cloud or something flying far away? I don't want to nominate it and have a bunch of people vote it down for being blown or something, so I wanted to check with you first.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ikan, sorry for the late answer, getting settled here in Wikimania required some time. I've cheched your fav and I think that it's a bit soft. This one looks better in terms of quality to me, and even in terms of composition. I also like this panorama from Valahnukur very much and following with panoramas these other 2 from Iceland are nice, too: Vestmannaeyjar port and Hrafnseyrarheiði Poco2 13:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Your first photo is really almost the same composition as the one I was favoring. I just nominated two photos at FPC, though, so I'll come back to this later. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:24, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
The nom is up. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Campaña

Hola Diego, ¿puedes añadir esta categoría: Category:Ballot papers for the 2016 Spain general election supported by Wikimedia España? Gracias --Discasto talk 21:25, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hola Discasto,   añadido. Otra cosa, para diferenciar las imágenes que se subieron entre 2015 y 2016 incluí en los segundos una categoría adicional. Saludos desde Esino! Poco2 14:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Gracias. El "problema" es que parece haber bastantes imágenes (unas 500) de municipios sin foto que no parecen haberse subido con la campaña. Desconozco por qué.... Un saludo y gracias --Discasto talk 14:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Discasto, si no me equivoco se incluyeron muchas imágenes antes de que se creara una campaña para este proyecto. Tb creo que algunos usuarios subieron sin utilizar la campaña y luego otro usuario (B25es quizás) las categorizó o les incluyó la plantilla. Les puedo echar un ojo (quién, cuándo, etc) en unos días. Poco2 15:09, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Tranquilo. Está todo controlado. Mi bot se ha encargado de categorizarlas: Category:Images from Spanish municipalities with no previous picture uploaded in 2016 y Category:Images from Spanish municipalities with no previous picture uploaded in 2015. Un abrazo. Pasadlo bien --Discasto talk 16:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Arte Religioso del Arzobispado, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 62.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality - you should geocode it, though. --Peulle 13:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muro del Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikimania

Can you help with the User digest on Commons Friday afternoon? I was asked about helping with it this morning... If you're in Esino, cam we meetup tonight? Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Adam, I cannot stay so long today in Esino, but I could take some work with me. I'd be the first time though that I do such a think. We can meet today at 5:30 p.m. Just let me know where. Right now I am located in the Museum. Otherwise we can meet tomorrow at 9:00 am. Poco2 14:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Afraid it actually started about when you got the message. Wish I could've got to your talk. I was dead on my feet from running around by the time I gave the talk. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Really wish we had gotten to meet while there; maybe next year? If you ever get to Edinburgh, or nearby, let me know. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Adam, the worst thing is that we probably met without knowing it. This Wikimania was though a bit special for me as I couldn't stay in the evenings nor as long as I'd have desired. I'd like to go to Montreal next year. Maybe it works then. Poco2 17:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Salada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 113.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna), Laguna de Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de la Luna, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 160.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valahnukur, Suðurnes, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 044.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villanueva del Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the deep shadow. Also appears to be slightly askew, but a special shot for me.--Famberhorst 15:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vista de Iquique, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 20.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Iquique, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 20.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Cañapa, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 70-74 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 119.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendedores en la Catedral Metropolitana, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Arte Religioso del Arzobispado, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paloma torcaz (Columba palumbus), Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2016-04-03, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:34, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Justicia, Plaza Republicana, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 51.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and I really like it. -- DerFussi 12:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

kyrillische Dateinamen

Es gibt einen Benutzer, der mit Vorliebe Flugzeugbilder verschiebt. Daß dabei Datum, Objekt, Urheber im dateinamen sind, interessiert ihn nicht. Blöd, daß ich danach meine Fotos nicht mehr wiederfinde. das versuche ich mit diesen Beschriftungen zu verhindern. --Ralf Roleček 21:12, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Volcán Paniri, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 23.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Volcán Paniri, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 23.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago Titicaca, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Formaciones rocosas, Selas, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia en el salar de Ascotán, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 57.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muralla, Vejer de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muralla, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but minor CAs. Please check the image. --XRay 17:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 31-33 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo del Antiguo Legado Estadounidense, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 44-46 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de la Catedral de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 97.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 91.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Marrovi 04:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Poco a poco/2016-06".