User talk:Poco a poco/2018-03

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de Aliaga, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Comment The people on the right may seem a bit smaller than they really are. But maybe the people in Lima, Peru are so small. The quality of the photo is good for me.--Famberhorst 16:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 84.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:18, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Puno y el Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 53-54 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista del centro de Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Hola Diego

Espero que estés bien. Tengo un problema al firmar las propuestas de imágenes a QIC. El sistema de firma no me funciona casi nunca en esa página. Sí funciona en otras. Me ocurre desde que cambiaron "Edit source" y para guardar hay que darle a "Publish changes" en la esquina superior izquierda de la página. Tengo Java activado y actualizado. ¿Sabes de alguien a quien le pueda preguntar y que responda en español? Gracias (ya verás como aquí la firma funciona) Lmbuga (talk) 14:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Ha funcionado Lmbuga (talk) 14:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Solucionado. He ido a preferencias y he eliminado todas las innovaciones. Ya me vuelve a funcionar como antes. Disculpa las molestias. No se me había ocurrido antes. Si algún día quieres volver por Galicia, hacemos planes. Te presento lo que podrías ver según el tiempo que estés. Tendría que ser preferiblemente en agosto, también vacaciones de navidad o semana santa. Un abrazo--Lmbuga (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Podría intentar que me acompañase alguno de mis dos hijos mayores, pues hablan perfectamente inglés, aunque no será posible todos los días--Lmbuga (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, perdona por responder tarde, cuando estoy en el trabajo no tengo tiempo para meterme en Commons, ahora tengo un ratillo (acabo de llegar a casa), pero aún me quedas cosas pendientes. Si ya se ha arreglado el problema, pues tanto mejor, posiblemente tuvieras activas 2 herramientas que, juntas, dan problemas, a mí me ha pasado alguna vez.

Sobre visitar Galicia, pues qué quieres que te diga no será por falta de ganas, y desde luego que lo haré, antes o después. Tranquilo que entonces te avisaré con tiempo. Eso sí, este verano lo veo difícil porque estaré por África. Un abrazo! Poco² 16:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pasargadae, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shish Badgiri, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Trieste, Italia, 2017-04-15, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

POTD

Hi Diego. Your image, File:Fuente en Baku, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-26, DD 227-229 HDR.jpg, which will be POTD in four days, can be up to deletion any moment since there is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan. I am not going to nominate it, but I started the discussion here.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vista de Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 63.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 63.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

FPC nominations

Including your current two nominations (which seem likely to fail), so far this year you have nominated 22 of your own photos.

• Fail: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral
• Pass: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral
• Pass: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral
• Pass: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral
• Pass: 8 support, 1 oppose, 3 neutral
• Pass: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral
• Pass: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral
• Pass: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral
• Fail: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral
• Pass: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral
• Likely fail: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral (current)
• Likely fail: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral (current)

These nominations required 170 votes by others, meanwhile you voted 32 times on other's nominations. Of the 22 nominations, 14 were failures, 3 just scraped a pass and 5 were solid passes (>= 10 supports), a 36% success rate and only 23% solid success rate. So we have just 5 photos with solid support and it took 170 votes by other people to award them.

• User:Diliff's last 22 nominations had only 2 failures and 19 solid passes. A solid success rate of 88%.
• User:Martin Falbisoner's last 22 nominations had 8 failures and 12 solid passes, 64% success and 55% solid success.
• User:W.carter's last 22 nominations had 8 failures and 10 solid passes, 64% success and 45% solid success, with 1 that had > 20 supports.
• User:Colin's last 22 nominations had 3 failures, all 19 passes were solid, 86% solid success, and 4 had > 20 supports.
• User:Code's last 22 nominations had 0 failures, all 22 passes were solid, 100% solid success, and 5 had > 20 supports.

With some people their lower success rate is because they experiment and try new things, either for themselves or for FPC, or because they are limited by equipment or travel opportunities. You don't have that excuse: you get to travel widely, have the best quality equipment you can buy, and stick to photos of landscapes and architecture that you are good at and that are widely appreciated by the FPC crowd. I wouldn't mind the constant nominations so much if they were new material and had a much higher quality level. But this is old weak material. Sure you get support: people trust you take a decent picture and know your name. But this year it has generally been boring and disappointing to review your nominations. Nobody likes opposing - it isn't good for the heart. Wrt the Benidorm photo that you call a "jewel"... It is a nice enough photo and you were lucky to get great weather. But there are countless similar photos on Google Images, there's nothing special about the midday lighting or the viewpoint, and the scene didn't really tax the capabilities of your professional Canon equipment. With your ability, experience, equipment and opportunities, that's the sort of "competent if unadventurous holiday photo" that I would hope would be the weakest image you might nominate, not one you claim to be a jewel. You know I respect your portfolio of photos and what you've uploaded to Commons is a huge contribution of high quality work. But I think you are, frankly, taking the piss at FPC. I don't review images at FPC to help you spin the roulette wheel and add some gold stars to your collection, but to enjoy seeing some of the finest images on Commons and going "wow" from time to time. Of all people at FPC, surely you have enough gold stars that the aim now should be to show off just your very finest work. -- Colin (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

What do you want? Are you jealous? --Ralf Roleček 00:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

I don't know, Ralf, but obviously he's obsessed. Otherwise he wouldn't had spent the afternoon counting votes.

My impression is that you find your explanation for everything, your reality. If other fail with their noms, they are trying something. There are many users with bad success ratios, and what? are you going to attack them, too? Nobody likes oppossing? I don't agree with that, some people really enjoy that specially when it comes to my noms. I don't know how people like you are always the first opposing but don't find time to support those solid noms of mine, that looks ackward to me. You talk about how disappointing it has been to review my work this year as if we were in the month of October. Funny is also that other users nominate some of my works (specially Ikan Kekek) and succeed, how to they manage that from an empty barrel? Actually I keep learning the preferences of the community with every nom and don't give a dime for "showing off" anything here. Regarding your statement about my "opportunities" and about "unadventurous holiday", let me tell you something. I live in a rented tiny apartment in Munich, my main transport mean is a 20 years old bike and all I manage to save is either to buy photoequiment exclusively for Wikimedia Commons or to travel (instead of renting a bigger apartment or buying one). Unadventurous holidays are the result of having a family with whom I'd like to spend some time and btw a family that is pretty fed up with the time and money I spend here.

What is your point actually? if you'd like to ban me from FPC, then, please address your problem in the admin's noticeboard. They'll probably laugh at you.

If you would really respect my work here you wouldn't be cyberbullying me. If you can manage something with this campaign is that I indeed stop uploading what I was planning to upload, and that's a lot. Poco² 06:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

You misunderstand "unadventurous holiday photo": it is the photo that is unadventurous (i.e. the sort of image taken by anyone with DSLR who goes to Benidorm). Perhaps the "scraping the barrel" metaphor is wrong and your archive really is full of gems. I truely am not the slightest interested in browsing it to find out but if Ikan likes to do that then that's his game. I can only go by what is nominated at FPC and you are consistently the biggest generator of failed noms and weak noms. Surely someone who has been on Commons nine years would have figured out what makes a great photo (not just a good photo or an acceptable photo) and be able to select their work with a better pass rate than 1 in 3. Yes it is only the start of March but in the six weeks so far you have nominated 22 images, and that isn't counting the nominations from others like Ikan, and the big majority of them are failures. How is that acceptable to you other than if you are just playing a game where you see what randomly passes. Throw enough photos at FPC and surely some will pass.

It is a rather naive and self-centred idea to claim that I or anyone else is especially opposing your images. It is also rather naive to think there is something meaningful to draw from "first oppose". The fact is, and you know this, that weak photos don't get support. People look, go "meh", and move on to the next candidate. They sit there, unloved, for half a day without any comment. If anything, there is especially a reluctance to oppose a big-name like yourself, whereas a newbie will be trashed quickly. So the main reason you might see my vote first is because a dozen other people, who never oppose, have passed yours by. You know quite well that if you nominate a great photo then it gathers 10 supports within a few hours. If you look at my voting record, I oppose quite a lot of nominations and we know the majority of voters at FPC just like to "Like!" photos and never oppose anything. So there are only a handful of reviewers who oppose with any regularity. If you are feeling "picked on" by them, then this is just ascertainment bias because you only concentrate your own noms. As for support, if there are already 15 supports then I may not bother to add my name, especially if the photo isn't truely amazing, which hasn't been the case with your noms this year. Of your 13 failures, I only opposed 5 and was only the first oppose in 3, so I'm hardly the main cause of your failures.

I am not commentting on or interested in your personal life. Merely stating that I see no excuse for nominating weak photos. You have a body of work (and forthcoming work - great) magnitudes larger and more varied-by-country than anyone else here. FPC is about the finest and your pass rate is much lower than the average, yet you are much more experienced than most here. Is it too much to ask that you stop constantly chucking QI sand at FPC for the community to seive through looking for jewels? Doesn't any photographer want to learn what makes a great photo and put that into practice by offering their finest work? -- Colin (talk) 10:13, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

+1 for "there is especially a reluctance to oppose a big-name like yourself, whereas a newbie will be trashed quickly". --cart-Talk 10:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Colin, my success ratio is pretty high if you consider the last 6 years, not just the last 6 weeks. I think that me, you, and the community can probably learn more from a failed nom than from a successful one and you prove to have little trust in the community assuming that "randomed" noms lead to a FP (although the image doesn't deserve it). I do know what images should pass without any problems in FPC, but I do have the right to try out those where I am not sure about it. You talk as if you were the truth, your opinion is as valid as mine or anybody else's here. If the opinion of the majority here concurs with your opinion then I expect to add to FPC rules something like "if your success rate of FPC noms drops below x% you should refrain from participating" or "...you should ask for an opinion first in this or that page" or "... whatever". In that case I will follow whatever rules the community establishes, is that fair enough? Poco² 10:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

If it was just my opinion that your noms were below par (below even the average for any noms, never mind someone with nine years experience) then you could complain about my truth vs yours. The fact is the community are rejecting the big majority of your noms, and mostly that's without any comment by me. At times, those who dare to oppose at FP get attacked with claims like yours above of "cyberbullying" or "picking on me" which don't actually stand up to any scrutiny if you bother to look at how else those reviewers have voted. Without those who oppose (or who bother to vote much at all, poco), then FPC simply becomes a game of how many Like! votes you can get. Popular, experienced, regular folk, like yourself, will naturally gather more Likes! particularly if you avoid opposing many nominations, or are careful to avoid opposing those folk who revenge vote. The community is big enough now that 7 supports is not hard (perhaps we should raise it to 10) and yes, quite a lot of "meh" photos pass FPC regularly. We don't have silly rules on success rate. Perhaps we should have some rule that if you withdraw a nomination then you still can't nominate another until it would have expired anyway. We reward fantastic photo noms with a quick pass but there is no sense in permitting folk to rapidly nominate failures - that just encourages careless and random nomination. You accuse me of being "obsessed" because I clicked on 20 of your nominations to show how poor your success rate was. I'm hardly going to click on six years worth. If you are saying that your nomination success ratio was better in the past, then that doesn't really seem to indicate someone who has learned from their failures. More, someone who has learned how to play the game or is no longer trying hard. -- Colin (talk) 11:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Colin: I am really busy in real life now and as you keep saying the same again and again and don't see where this discussion is leading to. I made you a proposal above and you ignored it. I'm open to everything: withdrawn noms are kept up to the end of the regular nom time, raising the bar of supporting votes, whatever the community here decides, and indeed I'll probably support those proposals, until then I don't see a big problem with cleaning up my backlog of own FPC candidates, sorry. --Poco² 11:18, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes, and I explained I'm not interested in silly rules. It is rather absurd to think that you might only reconsider your behaviour if there was some law against it. -- Colin (talk) 11:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Excuse me, Colin, but if policies and conventions based on the consensus (or at least majority) of the community members are silly to you, that's your problem not mine. If you consider that your opinion is above them and I must follow it, then I don't see how this issue of yours is gone come to an end. As said, if it is not just your opinion, but rather the believe of the majority here, I'll follow whatever rules are agreed on. I understand that this campaign of yours is not only applicable to me, but to all community members and a long-term "solution" can only be ensured via those silly rules. Until then you can just kindly ask me to take something into consideration, and I will think about it. In this case, though, I don't see any need to reconsider anything, sorry. --Poco² 17:05, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Do you needs rules to brush your teeth in the morning, or to wash your face and put deodorant on? But your colleagues at work probably appreciate you doing so. Perhaps you need rules to change out of your pyjamas? Poco, it is juvenile when someone asks you to reconsider your behaviour to respond with "Why? Is there a law against it? Go make a law or else I will do as I like." Nobody would think it reasonable to make a "brush teeth in the morning" law just because one or two have stinking breath and bad teeth. The community already have given their verdict on your nominations: two thirds of them are not FP material and nearly half of the others are only barely a pass. A reasonable person might examine that and consider trying to do better. To wonder why they are out-of-step with the community expectations and that if they expect others to vote on "the finest on Commons" then it is only fair and reasonable to start with one's own nominations and expect them fully to be the finest. Are you really happy with only being right one third of the time? With your experience, etc, it should be the case that you are fully surprised at any failure. Most people here I have seen improve over the years, have a desire to improve further, and not simply chuck out a continuous stream of nominations happy that just a small minority of them pass. -- Colin (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

I don't understand that comparison with teeth brushing and your expectation about what I nominate or I don't. I'll not nominate 3 images to FPs because there is (a silly rule that only allows) maximum of 2, will wait until the time is over because another rule says that, will not harass anybody because it violates our policies and will renominate after withdrawal because it's allowed to do so, as the nom gets a star if there are at least 7 supports and a 2/3 supporting vs opposing votes, that is how it works. And yes, I take care of my hygiene. Poco² 22:39, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

I don't want to comment on whether Poco is nominating too much and so on, but I'd like to say something about FPC in general: My offline life is very busy at the moment and my photographic interests have changed a lot (you might see in my Flickr stream that I do a lot of film photography and a lot of portrait and studio photography at the moment so both is nothing I would upload here on Commons), but I'm still coming around on FPC and QIC from time to time. From the perspective of a silent observer I have to say that the general quality level has lowered a lot. It's already months ago that I saw a really excellent nomination on FPC. Back in the good days (TM) when people like Benh, Diliff, DXR and others have been around we had a lot of really stunning nominations which have been very inspiring and motivated me a lot to improve my own skills. Nowadays we see a lot of average pictures (poor lighting, boring compositions, uninteresting subjects) and if I'd vote on them I would have to oppose them all. But that would seem rude and so I don't comment at all. And to be honest I don't understand many of these "experimental" or "artistic" nominations we see more frequently the last weeks (I hope you know what I mean - I don't want to offend anybody by linking some). What I want to say is that FPC was a better place some months or years ago and has become a very boring, uninspiring place now where some regulars dump one or two of their pictures each week to increase their star count for whatever reason. I'm not saying that Poco is necessarily one of them as I very much like most of his work but I think we have a general quality problem and I don't really know how to solve it. I just hope it will become better again soon. --Code (talk) 10:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

(Parenthetically, since I was drawn in here, I want you to know, Colin, that I am not trawling Poco's archives but at times nominating photos I really liked on QIC. Otherwise, I frankly think you have a point.) Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Ikan. It is interesting to note that of your last 22 nominations of Poco's photos, only 5 fail and 15 were solid passes. A 77% success rate and 68% solid success rate, with 1 that had > 20 supports. (Your overall success rate for anyone's photos is 73% for the last 22 nominations). So, there's nothing wrong with the source material, and that's the kind of success rate I'd expect from someone experienced, who knows the standard expected at FPC, but who also attempts the odd quirky nomination or who sometimes misjudges if an image has widespread appeal. I rest my case. -- Colin (talk) 11:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Ok, Colin, now you suggest that the material is good, but I'm not good picking up the FPC candidates. Well, that's a different animal, but just to confirm.

You seem to have a problem with a low success rate, I want to clean up my backlog of FP candidates and Ikan seems to have a good nose for FPs of other users. Would you, Ikan, go through my FP candidates category (there are actually 2, the main one and this one with those that need some rework) (no hurry) and let me know, let's say pickup 50 candidates, that you believe, would become FP (50 noms is just 10% of the ca. 500 images I've in both categories) Poco² 19:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Poco, my comments have always been about problems with your nominations. I have no idea how much of your material is good, because I don't look at it. I've seen plenty FPs from you over the years that I've been wowed by but also plenty over the years where I scratch my head. And this year I've seen a string of really poor nominations that I think anyone with experience should know are just QI or appeared to be milking an ancient photo shoot that already had two (undeclared) FP candidates. I don't think you really appreciate how much work you are asking Ikan to do, to do the job properly as I'm asking you to do. For each one of these, he has to investigate the category it is in to see what other FPs and QIs are already there (some perhaps by you!). Compare the other photos you took on the same photoshoot in case he gets "but I prefer this one" review comments. Remind himself of the standard of images in the possible FP categories it will be judged against. Examine it closely for defects that might be discovered at nomination. All the noise and CA and verticals and horizons that people nit pick over. Ensure the description and category and location are present. He has to do the most thorough review that any other reviewer might do. Even reviewing 500 images for WLM just to see which were rejects and which were possibles took many many hours and they had an efficient UI that presented each image in a larger format and there were very few images that were strong enough to deserve the close scrutiny that an FP requires. A category thumbnail is no way to view an image, so each would have to be opened and then the full size version downloaded. That's jolly tedious and time consuming work. And one problem I'm saying with your nominations is that each of your gold stars requires hours of community work already, sorting the wheat from the chaff, which isn't reciprocated by you on our nominations. I'm sure there are some "jewels" in my archive that I overlooked but I wouldn't ask anyone else to spend their time simply to earn me some gold stars.

What is the purpose of FP for us photographers Poco? For me it is a high standard to aim for when trying to improve my own photography. From time to time, I nominate the images I think are my best. If I took a great image in 2015 and didn't nominate it, then nominating it now is not going to help me be a better photographer or encourage me to take more pictures and better pictures in future. It was taken, uploaded and hopefully someone finds a use for it or enjoys looking at it. I don't know Ikan's motivation but he's indicated he likes nominating jewels he finds at QI. So perhaps the random discovery of a great image among a variety of photos by a variety of photographers is what he seeks. Please, Poco, what would be the purpose of trawling through your 500 "possible FP" images you took in the past? I think the healthiest thing you can do is delete the category and move on. Take some great pictures tomorrow. -- Colin (talk) 20:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Colin removing that category would be too harsh in my eyes, but I will try to skimm it down to that 10% by myself, let's see how it goes. And, by the way, that category no also contains images I uploaded 4 years ago, but also in the last months or even days. I am though by far not so strict as you are regarding FIFO. Sometimes I upload hunderts of images and propose some for FP. I still believe that there are some possible FPs, but upload again a few hunderts from a different series, that's how it has been in the last years. That's why I cannot definitely follow you when you talk about "scraping the barrel". Poco² 21:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Keep a small set of candidates if you want to batch things up, but 500 is ridiculous. I ask again what is the purpose of FP for you? What are you achieving by nominating a 4 year old photo? And that 10% crop of 50 photos will require at least 300 reviewers if they each get 7 supports, and 450 reviewers if they get 10 supports, 700 reviewers if they get 15 supports, etc. Are you planning to review and vote on 300, 450, 700 nominations? At your current nomination practice it takes 21.25 reviews to get one FP. So your next 50 FPs will need 1062 reviews. Are those other reviewers, who are mostly photographers, getting their share of help in encouragement and criticism from you in order to improve their photography? Or for the non-photographer reviewer/nominators, are they getting their share of consensus opinion on "what makes an FP" from you to help them improve their skill in looking at photos? And how does it help our photographers improve their game when they see an experience regular nominate an image with lousy light? As Code notes, it isn't just feedback on one's own photos that help, but also seeing fantastic photos by great photographers that pushes people harder. When people see your nominations at FPC, would you rather they consider you "consistently awesome" or "occasionally great but mostly so so"? Which would be more inspiring? -- Colin (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Colin, Ikan: I've managed to reduced the batch by more than 50% (200 candidates and 44 additional that need rework). I know that it's not yet what you expect but it is a first step, I believe. I will keep doing so in the coming weeks. After reviewing some of those candidates closely I do believe that I can still reduce a lot, but also that there is some really good stuff there, you'll see. Poco² 18:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

That's cool, but this doesn't really matter to me. I simply judge nominated photos on a case-by-case basis. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

I have all due respect for both Poco's and Colin's work; the only thing that has been bothering me all the time is, that many of our most valuable contributors, including both of you, tend to have a little bit too high opinion of themselves, and for Poco -- to be honest -- this applies somewhat more, even considering his particularly high productivity. It's only my humble opinion and it's unlikely to be taken seriously, but @Poco: I wish you would participate more in active reviewing on FPC, as well as pre-select your nominations a bit more carefully; also, add coordinates to your pictures (it's indeed easy to shoot photos with correct GPS stamp in EXIF even when the camera doesn't have GPS module -- all you need is actually a smartphone! Very practical esp. for remote areas). And as for Colin, I think adding a category like "Featured pictures of London" to your promoted pictures is quite easy and I don't understand why I always have to do this job (yes, same applies to W.carter, Ermell, Llez, and many more). As I said, it's all just what I'd wish (and yes, I wish Diliff would be there again and not only with church interiors ;-) ), so don't take it seriously if you don't feel like that. Of course I will continue checking all newly promoted FPC's anyway and adding categories where they are missing. --A.Savin 14:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

A.Savin, you may be right about opinion, though I get plenty opportunity in life to find out when I'm wrong or point out my defects :-).

I have spoken frequently about how broken I think our category system is and how it seems to get used to hide images in 10 layers of nesting. I don't understand why us humans should have to combine distinct categories "feature pictures" and "images of London" when it is trivial for databases to combine them at the point someone makes a query -- that's what databases are designed to do. This could be done when someone does a search, but could also be done with some wiki template/code in your "Featured pictures of London" page that automatically joins two categories and flattens their contents. It is Commons very poor UI that seems to cause so many of us volunteers to create all sorts of category permutations. If you think the location of feature pictures is a generally useful category then I shall try to remember to add it, though may forget. We seem to have no shortage of people who like categorising things. When I uploaded my latest batch of photos from Denmark, it added quite a lot of time to research the category, wikipedia article, and I'm adding GPS using Lightroom maps, which is also slow work. I can imaging Poco has even more tedious job with even larger volume.

Do you have an app you recommend for adding GPS more automatically? I have an android phone. It would need to keep recording locations automatically, as I would certainly forget to press a button with every shot (nor have enough hands free). I have found that having an app record GPS for mapping and following routes in the countryside (Viewranger) eats the battery quickly such that I have to attach a battery pack. -- Colin (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes for such database queries there are tools like FastCCI, but they have a big problem, when taking a category with the whole tree and all possible sub-categories. Because of its logical connections, a category may be e.g. in more than one country's tree. In short, only the category "Featured pictures of London" (of Moscow / of Denmark / of butterflies etc. pp.) will show accurately how many FP's of London/Moscow/Denmark/butterflies etc. there are.

For automatical GPS stamp, you need a smartphone with GPS and bluetooth. For Sony, you need the app "PlayMemories Mobile" (yes, I've said goodbye to Canon). Activate bluetooth on camera and phone, connect the camera with the phone using the app. Keep the phone near the camera (normally no problem) and shoot photos with GPS tag, that's the way how it works with my equipment. --A.Savin 16:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

A.Savin, sadly my phone is not one of the models compatible. Congratulations on your new camera. I'm very jealous. -- Colin (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

A.Savin: The 5DSR got one priority, resoulution and megapixels, many other things had a lower priority (or none, like Bluetooth, WiFi or GPS). There are surely some possibilities regarding geocoding (logger, apps, etc.) but I was hopping something like an Eye-Fi car in the camera that talks to camera and cellphone to include the GPS in the raw file (if a WiFi would be required, the cellphone can arrange it, as well), but such a solution has not been launched, although technically may be possible. If that's fair enough I can at least include the coordinates in my future FPCs --Poco² 19:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Poco, just to respond to your query above: I seriously doubt I'll have the time to look through 50 pictures. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Ok ,no worries, Ikan, it was just an idea/proposal Poco² 21:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción, Establés, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Setiles, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terzaga, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zárabes, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:31, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Cristal, Parque del Retiro, Madrid, España, 2017-05-18, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Building is leaning inward on the left side, verticals are not straight. --Halavar 16:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 11:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)  Support OK, good now. QI for sure. --Halavar 13:48, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yelo, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morcuera, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 10:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Cipriano, Montejo de Tiermes, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zárabes, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rasa, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueducto, Belmonte de Gracián, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Ateca, Zaragoza, España, 2013-01-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berrueco, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Almonte, Huelva, España, 2015-12-07, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro de las ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor CAs. --XRay 06:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ólvega, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Parterre, Parque del Retiro, Madrid, España, 2017-05-18, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Velázquez, Museo del Prado, Madrid, España, 2017-05-18, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barillas, Navarra, España, 2017-05-23, DD 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portella, Lérida, España, 2015-12-23, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio de la fiebre del oro, Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-26, DD 45-47 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrocarril White Pass, Girdwood, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-31, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasolinera, Chicken, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-28, DD 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autopista Richardson, Copper Center, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ketchikan, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-16, DD 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver, Ketchikan, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-16, DD 17-19 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio de la fiebre del oro, Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-26, DD 42-44 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:20, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buzón en el Refugio Nacional de Vida Silvestre Tetlin, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-24, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:20, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beluga Point, Anchorage, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bomba de gasolina en un comercio en Trapper Creek, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-31, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ketchikan, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-16, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poste de Tótem, Anchorage, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-09-01, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 19:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver, Ketchikan, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-16, DD 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cúmulus, Portage, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helicóptero Robinson R44, Parque estatal Chugach, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Área geotérmica de Geysir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 095.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ísafjörður, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 068.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 20:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolungarvík, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 050-053 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:14, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tordelpalo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 44.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 44.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Vestmannaeyjar, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 134.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the sharpest of your works, but good enough for QI. --Peulle 07:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Vestmannaeyjar, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 095.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Reikiavik desde el Paseo de la Bahía, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 166-168 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:29, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Parterre, Parque del Retiro, Madrid, España, 2017-05-18, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a big spot in the center/top , maybe caused by dust on the sensor; the obviously white parts of the buildings have got a blue tint, can you confirm it?. -- DerFussi 20:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 10:17, 3 March 2018 (UTC) OK -- DerFussi 10:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Arcos de la Frontera desde el Balcón de la Peña Nueva, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What a great view! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro romano de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de España, Vejer de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flamenco en el Palacio Andaluz, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en el Parque de Doñana, España, 2015-12-07, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piedras Rojas, salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salar de Tara, Chile, 2016-02-07, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the main object --Michielverbeek 07:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Catedral Vank, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 118-120 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral Vank, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 118-120 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista desde la torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-15, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 08-09 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Árbol del cepillo (Callistemon citrinus), Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciudadela de Meybod, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mezquita de Nasirolmolk, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 57-59 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mezquita de Nasirolmolk, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 57-59 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 21-23 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 23:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 24-25 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Trieste, Italia, 2017-04-15, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ópera, Ereván, Armenia, 2016-10-03, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:05, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gavión Atlántico (Larus marinus), Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 100.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lyrical; would make a good book cover --Daniel Case 23:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice. --XRay 18:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 148.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 82.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 01-02 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent, but we're not looking at desert in this picture. Please edit the file description, so as to make clear what we are looking at. -- Ikan Kekek 19:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)  Support - Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 02:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alhóndiga, Guadalajara, España, 2018-01-04, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aranzueque, Guadalajara, España, 2018-01-04, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:49, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Torija, Guadalajara, España, 2018-01-04, DD 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Torija, Guadalajara, España, 2018-01-04, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 142.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 67.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A little bit dark and unusual perspective, but IMO OK. --XRay 09:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Merced, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 102.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:24, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Libertador, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:52, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:36, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Republicana, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Jadraque, Guadalajara, España, 2018-01-04, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista desde la torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trametes versicolor, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ísafjörður, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 071.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Puno y el Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 73-78 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:21, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tambomachay, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 93.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista del centro de Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 01-03 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 19:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Correos y Telégrafos, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 105.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Área geotérmica de Geysir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 080.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 19:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 19:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torres de Cuart, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 92.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ágora, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Garni, Armenia, 2016-10-02, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but too much sky IMO--Lmbuga 13:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Russia

Hi Diego! Thanks for your contribution to the Russian contest! I just wanted to cross-check that you received your prize (Amazon certificate). It took ages before Wikimedia Russia managed to arrange it, and now they finally told me it's there and has been sent out. Has it arrived? --Alexander (talk) 19:38, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Alexander, thanks for paying a visit, no, I haven't got the Amazon voucher yet. I also got an email that the problem was somehow solved but I guarantee you that 6 months later I haven't got anything yet and communication with your colleageues is not really fluent. Best, Poco² 21:44, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

communication with your colleageues is not really fluent

That's my problem too...=( --Alexander (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Actually, Alexander, I was starting to believe that I was being the problem, but now I am relieved to hear that it isn't the case. Poco² 19:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Alexander, I got yesterday the voucher, many thanks to User:Ctac for stepping in! Poco² 06:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Great! Thanks for your feedback! --Alexander (talk) 08:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yate Darwin, isla Baltra, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:20, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tortuga gigante de San Cristóbal (Chelonoidis chathamensis), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:09, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgen de El Panecillo, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Quito desde El Panecillo, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 50-54.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de los Andes, Limatambo, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 76.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 12:02, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de los Andes, Limatambo, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 75.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Lmbuga 12:02, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Ljubljanica, Liubliana, Eslovenia, 2017-04-15, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de Piedra, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 68.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de Piedra, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 97.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatro Nacional y Museo de Lucha Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Ohrid, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ágora, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 57.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the dust spots in the sky, there are several ones --Uoaei1 17:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)  Done, thanks and sorry, that was pretty obvious, Poco a poco 21:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:51, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Skurda, Kotor, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Río Valira, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-29, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Vejer de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yacimiento de Nuestra Señora del Pueyo, Belchite, España, 2015-01-08, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:38, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ánsar común (Anser anser) en el Palacio de Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tráfico en Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)