User talk:Poco a poco/2019-03

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 44-50 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful panorama. --Tournasol7 23:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrocarril Swakopmund-Walvis Bay, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 086-096 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nido de tejedores republicanos (Philetairus socius), Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jetty, Swakopmund, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenocara dentata, Cañón Sesriem, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. What are the beetles doing? -- Ikan Kekek 22:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jetty, Swakopmund, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tejedor republicano (Philetairus socius), Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Cristo, Windhoek, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Áloe-aljaba (Aloe dichotoma), parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de ferrocarril, Windhoek, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 10-12 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If you get rid of that dust spot in the upper left corner I'd be happy to review this as very good quality! --PtrQs 02:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 20:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC) so I review this as very good quality --PtrQs 23:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duna 45, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent composition, but no FP for me --Michielverbeek 23:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 147-153 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en el parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 09-14 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en el parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en el parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 74-81 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en el parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 68-72 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenocara gracilipes, parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Disappointing at bigger than full-page size, but this is a very small creature, so good quality, considering. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañón Sesriem, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tejedor republicano (Philetairus socius), Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:25, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 23-29 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:59, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 123-129 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blepharis gigantea, parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tejedor republicano (Philetairus socius), Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Cristo, Windhoek, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jetty, Swakopmund, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 22:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañón Sesriem, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 177-185 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tintenpalast, Windhoek, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 23:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 30-36 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good quality. --Michielverbeek 23:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I would be great that you can recognise the tree species in the foreground. --Tournasol7 00:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jetty, Swakopmund, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 68-70 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carlos yo 23:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 105-122 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are 4 little stitching problems in the horizon line to be fixed. --Milseburg 10:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 18:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC) Good quality, If I did not know that it is not liked here, I would say, that the image qualitatively would benefit from a slight scaling down. Actually, it can only be considered correctly in full resolution and it is actually too big for ordinary use and one wishes for more sharpness. --Milseburg 09:24, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puesta de sol, desierto de Namib, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en el parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the tree --Michielverbeek 19:22, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 101-104 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 101-104 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Río Ljubljanica y mercado central, Liubliana, Eslovenia, 2017-04-14, DD 15-17 HDR.jpg

And also:

• File:Río Ljubljanica y mercado central, Liubliana, Eslovenia, 2017-04-14, DD 20-22 HDR.jpg
• File:Río Ljubljanica y mercado central, Liubliana, Eslovenia, 2017-04-14, DD 23-25 HDR.jpg
• File:Río Ljubljanica y mercado central, Liubliana, Eslovenia, 2017-04-14, DD 29-31 HDR.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 19:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papión chacma (Papio ursinus), parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzkoppe, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 19:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papión chacma (Papio ursinus), parque nacional de Namib-Naukluft, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruinas de la Iglesia de Trzęsacz, Voivodato de Pomerania Occidental, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaviota patiamarilla​ (Larus michahellis), Trzęsacz, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Niechorze, voivodato de Pomerania Occidental, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 35-40 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de Trzęsacz, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Swakopmund, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:13, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del agua, calle Wiśniowa, Breslavia, Polonia, 2017-12-21, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procesión del Santo Entierro del Viernes Santo, Ágreda, Soria, España, 2018-03-29, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puesta de sol, desierto de Namib, Namibia, 2018-08-05, DD 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaviota patiamarilla​ (Larus michahellis), Trzęsacz, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Niechorze, voivodato de Pomerania Occidental, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:56, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Niechorze, voivodato de Pomerania Occidental, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Concepción, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco de Asís, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Jorge, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 041-049 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 041-049 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vistas de Candelaria, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-12, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vistas desde la cima del Teide, Parque Nacional del Teide, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-16, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo masónico histórico, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Sebastián de la Gomera, La Gomera, España, 2012-12-14, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments several dust spots on the left --MB-one 10:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 20:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

[Wiki Loves Love] Jury begins!

Greetings Poco a poco,

Thanks for being a part of the Wiki Loves Love 2019 International Team as a jury member. It is of great pleasure to have you onboard with us. I'm Krishna Chaitanya (User:KCVelaga) from India, and I'll be coordinating the jury this year for WLL. Last week, we conducted the first round of filtration, and now we are moving onto the actual jury process. I've added your username to the Montage tool (for jury process), and you access the tool at https://tools.wmflabs.org/montage/#/ Please use your Wikimedia account to access the tool. In this round, you have around 300 images to rate, and the deadline for this round is 22 March 2019. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk · mail) 06:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zapato de la Reina, Parque Nacional del Teide, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-16, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The object in the middle should be removed. --Ermell 11:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Not sure what you mean, if you talked about a white strip in the air left side, is gone, otherwise would be great if you could add a note --Poco a poco 20:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Looks like a mild drop. See my annotation. --Ermell 21:27, 12 March 2019 (UTC)  Done, that was a sloppy dust spot cleaning --Poco a poco 19:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

PA on userpage

This are personal attacks on a userpage and should be removed, or at least no user should be called by name and alleged of harassment on a frequently-visited userpage at the same time. I also think that, given all the history of your diva-like behaviour, you should not have the sysop flag anymore and should voluntarily give it back. We already once had a user on Commons who was very much dedicated to the project, very active every day and had an excellent reputation, but then one day got so much frustrated that he misused his admin bit as a revenge tool for mass vandalism, deletion of Main Page etc.. For my part, I really don't wish such thing to repeat, but given your attitude, sadly, I cannot think anymore that it's fully unlikely. Nothing personal, sorry. It's just that I care for the project and its content and its reputation, not only for my own achievements. --A.Savin 17:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

I am not calling anybody by his name, those are project usernames, I have no clue whether those names match their real names as I don't know these 2 individuals in real life. It is funny that you, who has participated in the last discussion that indeed frustrated me and are clearly biased, compromise yourself making that bias obvious as you didn't seem to care a shit about the fact that you and me still show up in another user page. Had you forgotten that?

Giving back the admin rights because of my "diva-like behaviour" (thanks for the insulting my contributions here)?. And it is precisely you who is asking for that? who not long ago sent me a private email praising my work as admin with a difficult user, and precisely you who [Removed libelous content. Please avoid personal attacks --A.Savin 01:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)]? And you mean me, who has never been blocked in any wiki since I am here in 2007, has 45,000 actions as admin and counting (mostly deletions and blocks) on es.wiki and knows in person mostly everybody in the community after attending the last 6 Wikimania (for which I was honored with a scholarship thank to my wikidedication)? from whom should be the community here be more afraid of, my friend? The story about that user that you provided, far from being an argument of any weight, could be applied to any of the 222 admins on Commons, and therefore is pointless.

Please, stay away with your threads and absurd ideas, and, in any case, let those speak who may be concerned. Poco² 18:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Poco, you are of course free to criticize my sysop work as often as you wish and you are even perfectly free to find all my pictures shit, I don't care that much. But please do not lie. "has been blocked and banned from German wiki [...] several times" is a lie. I've neber been banned (=indefinitely blocked) there. If you take all block log entries in consideration including those with my old account I've discontinued years ago, most of those still are on own request or by mistake, and the rest is not longer than a couple of days in sum. For German wikipedia, it's almost nothing, let alone for a user who did over 80.000 edits and wrote some thousands of articles ;-) And basically, informations on my long-ago activities on that project are fully irrelevant for today's activity on Commons and non-public. Please refrain from refering to it, especially if what you say is a lie. This, btw, together with your immature behaviour and editwarring against Colin and Cart on your user page, one more time shows how inappropriate you are as a sysop.

Your example on Hans-Jürgen Norbert userpage is interesting. It's not like I am amused about being listed there, but may I remind you that a) you and me, at least, are not being openly accusing of harassment on that page and b) that page is presumably BY FAR not as often visited (also by non-Commons users) as yours? --A.Savin 00:35, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

After some closer look and consideration, I've decided to remove the attack page by HJN that you mentioned above, too [1]. Please note, however, that it still has nothing to do with your recent (and not only recent) behaviour and all the problems it causes. --A.Savin 17:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

I have reverted your edit to your user page. Restoring it would be ... extremely unwise and not end well for you. I hope that is very, very clear. Take a break poco. -- Colin (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puesta de sol en Trzęsacz, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruinas de la Iglesia de Trzęsacz, Voivodato de Pomerania Occidental, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Garachico, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cañón Sesriem, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drago milenario, Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jetty, Swakopmund, Namibia, 2018-08-04, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 13:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Monumento a Rainis en Esplānade, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 01.JPG

Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Niechorze, voivodato de Pomerania Occidental, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Jorge, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercado de Nuestra Señora de África, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Garachico, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:10, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parroquia De Nuestra Señora De Los Dolores y San Felipe Apóstol, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rompeolas, Trzęsacz, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 113.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaviota patiamarilla​ (Larus michahellis), Trzęsacz, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:11, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tribunal Superior de Justicia, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The outline of the upper part of the tower could have been sharper. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 17:10, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central hidroeléctrica de Walchensee, Kochel, Baviera, Alemania, 2014-03-22, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 16:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio Sw. Krzyza, Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-07, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but some CA by the top edge --Trougnouf 23:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 14:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio Sw. Krzyza, Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but some CA in the top corners --Trougnouf 23:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 14:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:18, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 018-033 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 018-033 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo Trausnitz, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It reminds me of a picture of M.C. Escher. --XRay 10:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biergarten, Herrsching, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaviota patiamarilla​ (Larus michahellis), Trzęsacz, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Don José I, Plaza del Comercio, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop ist like it's hot? --Der Angemeldete 18:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)  Support - I don't understand your question, but the photo is good, IMO. If you disagree, feel free to change the status to "Discuss". -- Ikan Kekek 02:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de tren São Bento, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Don Pedro IV, Rossio, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 18:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)  Comment - Considering that the statue is the main subject, not the tall pole, I think it should be sharper. Could you try sharpening a bit more? -- Ikan Kekek 02:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ammersee, Herrsching, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some spots in the sky. --Ermell 13:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 21:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de la Inmaculada Concepción, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-15, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Mariña, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de tren São Bento, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Julián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Niechorze, voivodato de Pomerania Occidental, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments chromatic aberration's on branches --Ezarate 23:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 20:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 22:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Iglesia Nova Gracanica, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 14-16 HDR.jpg

I think that the name of the temple is wrong. New Gračanica is a Serbian monastery (and a temple) in the USA, this temple seems to belong to Hercegovačka Gračanica monastery. --jdx ^Re: 08:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Jdx, I've renamed it. --Poco² 21:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de los Congregados, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 18:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente Rossio, Plaza de Don Pedro IV, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 18:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Don Pedro IV, Rossio, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 18:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Vimara Peres, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments needs sharpening --Der Angemeldete 18:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 20:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Ok. --Der Angemeldete 17:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jabirú africano​ (Ephippiorhynchus senegalensis), delta del Okavango, Botsuana, 2018-07-31, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 18:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardim do Morro, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral Vieja, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tight crop but impressive and therefore good image for me -- Spurzem 18:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cais da Ribeira, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ah... come on! Pro for the beautiful shot and a big contra for the gone shadows and the posterization. That's in no way a sufficient colored quality image. But it looks great though --Der Angemeldete 19:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Serra do Pilar, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación de tren São Bento, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice shot. --MB-one 08:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Niechorze, voivodato de Pomerania Occidental, Polonia, 2018-11-03, DD 26-31 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right frame is not sharp. Is that fixable? --Ermell 21:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC) Indeed, I can only think of a crop to fix that. Will take care about that tomorrow, thanks. --Poco a poco 22:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 14:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC) CA at the branches on the left and stitching errors at the buoy need to be fixed as well. --Ermell 13:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 20:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)