User talk:Q28/0

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--SCP-2000 15:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

提示

Latest comment: 3 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

批量提删可以考虑使用COM:VFC。 -akko (talk) 07:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

@-akko: 批量提删这边我已经基本处理完了，我现在正在批量将Images without source分类里的文件挂上{{subst:nsd}}并通知上传者。不知道C区是否有批量挂模板的脚本？--Alcremie (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

VFC设置prepend any text模式（在页面最前方放置文本）。 -akko (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

了解了，谢谢！--Alcremie (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
User:Alcremie已被注册，请不要将其设置为签名避免混淆。 -akko (talk) 08:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
那么这样呢？-- 08:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:SIGN -akko (talk) 08:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
我用回了original sign。--IN (talk) 08:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

DR category

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for your edits on Commons:Deletion requests/File:POKÉMON TREE.jpg, but please remember to add <noinclude></noinclude> within the category. Therefore, the category will only list on the DR page, but not the daily DR list.--A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@A1Cafel: I got it. Thank you for reminding.--Q28 (talk) 11:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

File:The 100th Anniversary of the Founding of The Communist Party of China logo.png

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:The 100th Anniversary of the Founding of The Communist Party of China logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--shizhao (talk) 11:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SCP-2000 14:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

@SCP-2000 But this isn't about the file, is it? Q28 (talk) 08:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Please see the deletion request. SCP-2000 12:22, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@SCP-2000, But isn't this delete request over? Q28 (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 原因：无人回复。Q28 (talk) 08:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Q28. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--SCP-2000 13:31, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@SCP-2000, I have learned this information so far, and I have stopped creating that page. Q28 (talk) 21:47, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 原因；长时间没有人回复。--Q28 (talk) 11:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Minecraft missing texture block.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Minecraft missing texture block.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Артём 13327 (talk) 10:54, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 原因：该文件已保留。--Q28 (talk) 11:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Minecraft missing texture block.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Minecraft missing texture block.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK ∣ enWiki 20:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 原因：该文件已保留。--Q28 (talk) 11:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

File:RIR IPv4 Address Run-Down Model.png

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:RIR IPv4 Address Run-Down Model.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

SCP-2000 12:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. In the end, the picture was deleted, which I regret.--Q28 (talk) 13:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leucanthemum vulgare 'Filigran' Flower 2200px.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Okay, so let's just leave it at that. Q28 (talk) 12:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 08:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

About your addition the translation pages that has the language code 'zh-cn'

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. You have added some translated pages into Mainland Chinese, such as Template:File permission/zh-cn or Template:No license since/zh-cn. However, they were almost or exactly identical to the translated pages for the language code 'zh-hans' or 'zh'. It is inappropriate to add pages in vain in this manner because the language code 'zh-xx' pages are used to separate pages for different words in Chinese-speaking countries, the word differences are '資訊' and '信息', '連結' and '链接', or '檔案' and '文件', for example. They are useless if they do not differ, so please do not create such pages. Thank you. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 01:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

@TKsdik8900I've slowed down the creation of these pages for now. Q28 (talk) 05:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

SpBot存档所有使用

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 05:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

标记满1天的段落。档案概览请查看User talk:Q28/。最新档案位于/0。 Q28 (talk) 05:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Tu Zi.gif

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tu Zi.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tu Zi.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, RZuo (talk) 11:29, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately, these pictures were eventually deleted. Q28 (talk) 07:52, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 04:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Randpm.org z z v p.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Randpm.org z z v p.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Randpm.org z z v p.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. The report due to the damage has now been repaired.--Q28 (talk) 11:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Meaning of "Discuss" status at Com:Qic

Latest comment: 1 year ago13 comments2 people in discussion

It's a really annoyingly misleading status. It normally should not be used just because a discussion is taking place! Normally, the only good reason to use this status for QIC nominations is when there is a disagreement about whether a nomination should be promoted or declined. I have argued for changing this misleading status, but people didn't agree! Anyway, thanks.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek, thanks to your reminder, I have reduced the abuse of this status at present. Q28 (talk) 01:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Like I said, it's not your fault. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Do YOU mean I can continue to abuse this template? Q28 (talk) 10:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

What an odd question! I'm saying I didn't think it was your fault for taking the meaning of "Discuss" at face value, but your odd question has me wondering... Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek, I mean, as long as I think each nomination is worth discussing, I can let him become a discussion state, right? Q28 (talk) 08:31, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

I think you really are having trouble understanding what I'm trying to say to you. When you change the status of a Com:Qic nomination to "Discuss", it moves the nomination to Consensual Review for additional votes. Merely having a discussion should not involve a change in the nomination's status. Just leave your comment and leave the status as it is. Is that clear? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek, Thank you for your quick reply. Therefore, even if the discussion is very long, as long as there is no disagreement, there must not to enter the state of discussion and on the contrary, when an image has both supporting and opposing opinions, it must be moved to the discussion area, is it right? Q28 (talk) 08:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Exactly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek Oh, OK, I see. In the future, I will only go into discussion mode when I have an opinion that is contrary to that of other users. Is this correct? Q28 (talk) 08:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes. I'm sorry it's so confusing; as I said, I've repeatedly suggested renaming this status and been outvoted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ikan KekekNow do you think this topic should stop here? Q28 (talk) 06:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

I had totally forgotten about this thread. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. 由于这些天我的讨论页话题数量大量增多，故决定存档。Q28 (talk) 12:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RS Puppis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

This should be one of my few nominations and wins the VIC. Q28 (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Messier83 - Heic1403a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Messier83 - Heic1403a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

うーん、いいよ。 Q28 (talk) 05:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 13:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Randpm.org z z v p.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Randpm.org z z v p.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lemonaka (talk) 09:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

I have decided not to upload pictures here in the future.

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 13:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

File:OnlineHelpButton.png

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:OnlineHelpButton.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lemonaka (talk) 10:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

There are many clearer pictures of swimming rings, so we don't need to use a fuzzy one.

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 03:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Random-art.org v.jpg

And also:

File:Random-art.org vs.jpg

Yours sincerely, Lemonaka (talk) 10:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

It's still deleted, and we don't have any solution for it.

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 00:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Logo yes!.png

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Logo yes!.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lemonaka (talk) 17:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Yesline.jpg is the HD version of this file.

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Q28 (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Template:Motd/2023-05-13

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Sorry, I meant May 23, 2023 (Template:Motd/2023-05-23). The same file was posted (Wikipe-tanCrazy-my.gif) only under a different name (Wikipe-tanCrazy.gif). --ValeriySh (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

@ValeriyShBut the reality is that the content of the presentation on May 13 and July 15 this year is the same. Should you deal with this? Q28 (talk) 11:11, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Since I can no longer edit such pages, I had to archive.Q28 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Warning

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Do not add files of obviously poor quality (i.e. File:Chaai seth transparent Logo.gif) as Media of the Day. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Since I'm not sure which images are bad, I'm using a template ({{Low quality}}) to distinguish them for the time being, and if they don't have this template, I'll add them to the POTD-list. Q28 (talk) 07:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Since I can no longer edit such pages, I had to archive.Q28 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Motd

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Please add an English description when you propose a file for MOTD. Usually you just have to copy the description provided in the file page. Otherwise, you can use Google Translate if you find difficult to write a description in English. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:48, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

@Yann: At present, most of the files I recommend are public screen files, and most of these files correspond to The national anthem of a country whose day is Independence Day. Because most of the daily templates are consistent, I only write special descriptions at certain nodes, such as October 1. I don't want to copy others, so I don't add them. In fact, you can easily add them. Q28 (talk) 10:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Well, adding descriptions take a lot of time, so it is important that whoever adds a file should also add a description. Yann (talk) 11:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

@Yann According to my observation, most of the additions to the current file description are added before the file is displayed. Q28 (talk) 08:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Since I can no longer edit such pages, I had to archive.Q28 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)