|(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)|
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 03:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Bonsecours Market postcardEdit
Hi. Image:Bonsecours Market Montreal Quebec Old Postcard.jpg looks like a useful image very likely to be in the public domain. However I note that you listed the author as "unknown" and that the "author died more than 70 years ago". That doesn't seem to make much sense-- you don't know who it was, but you know when they died? Puzzled, -- Infrogmation 03:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, right. It was fixed, thanks. RedAndr 18:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Library and Archives Canada non-public domain imagesEdit
You have uploaded one or more images from Library and Archives Canada which is tagged as "copyrighted free use". Since Library and Archives Canada has made it clear they have not granted permission for free use of its photo catalogue, I have nominated all non-public domain images for deletion. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Library and Archives Canada non-PD images. Thanks - some day, when your image(s) enter(s) the public domain, it can return to Commons! --Padraic 15:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
|Pay attention to copyright||Image:Cosmos-954 debris.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
- [[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.
BotMultichillT 06:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Atmosphere composition diagram.svg is uncategorized since 1 May 2009.
- Image:Westmount Park.jpg is uncategorized since 16 June 2009.
- Image:The Tour de l'Ile de Montreal 2009.jpg is uncategorized since 17 June 2009.
- Image:Cosmos-954 scheme.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
|File:PiratesVsTemp.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
File source is not properly indicated: File:Millie_and_Barbara_Bush.jpgEdit
|This media was probably deleted.|
|A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Millie_and_Barbara_Bush.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
If you created the content yourself, enter
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.
Hi RedAndr, do you happen to know what species of Magnolia is depicted in your file File:Magnolia Bud.jpg? The bud (especially the scales) is so atypical for a Magnolia that I won't believe it is one until you can provide us with a proper species name (must be an exotic one, if it is a Magnolia in the first place). - Wikiklaas (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Ozonolysis CarbonylOxide Formation.svg is disputedEdit
|Dispute notification||The chemical structure File:Ozonolysis CarbonylOxide Formation.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.
In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 16:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
What do the colours of the arrow tell?
- There are no other streams on the map and there is nothing to compare with Golfstream. So, the color gradient just reflects the fact it become cooler at North. --RedAndr (talk) 15:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- I did not suppose you have drawn differnt streams, but if you look at Norwegian hydrology, you see, that in the Norwegian Sea there are the Golfstream and cold streams.
- Ulamm (talk) 23:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)