User talk:Renardo la vulpo/Archive 2

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2 eŭroj Slovenio, 10 jaroj da kontanta eŭromono, 3.jpeg

And also:

• File:2 eŭroj Slovenio, 10 jaroj da kontanta eŭromono.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2 eŭroj, Elizea Kontrakto 50-jara, 1.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Euro-Gedenkmünzen

Hello, Renardo la vulpo. You have new messages on another wiki at [[Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (Germany)#{{{2}}}]]. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

De728631 (talk) 19:08, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Correction

Thanks for your comments. Will try to fix the problem as soon as I get a better Internet connection. It is quite slowwwwwww right now or most of the time disappear altogether. Or if you'd like, you can remove the picture. Cheers --Mattis (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

@Mattis: Danke, ich habe das Bild durch ein Bild des Kastulusmünsters ersetzt. -- Aisano (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bukareŝto, parlamentejo de sudo 1 retuŝita.jpeg

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Esperanto

Hallo Aisano, eine kleine Frage in sprachlicher Angelegenheit: Spricht man in Esperanto das "j" als "i" oder als "sch" aus? Ich hätte letzteres in Erinnerung, kommt mir aber jetzt oft eigenartig vor. Gruß --Eweht (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

@Eweht: Genauso wie auf Deutsch, also als "i", nur dass es keine Silbe bildet. Du meinst eventuell ĵ (mit Zirkumflex oben drauf), das spricht man aus wie in "Journal". darkweasel94 10:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Ah, danke, alles klar. --Eweht (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Da bleibt nichts hinzuzufügen. -- Aisano (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Neuer Haltepunkt auf der Mangfalltalbahn

Es wäre sinnvoller, wenn du die alte Karte überschreiben würdest, statt eine neue Datei anzulegen mit zu 99% gleichem Inhalt. Das verwirrt nur. Trotzdem Danke für den Hinweis. --Vuxi (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@Vuxi: Danke, das habe ich mir natürlich überlegt. Aber es ist nun mal eine andere Karte, und die Richtlinien von Commons sagen zum Beispiel, dass man ein altes Firmenlogo nicht überschreiben soll, wenn eine Firma ein neues annimmt. Es könnte ja jemand die bisherige Karte verwenden, um die Entwicklung der Mangfallbahn zu illustrieren. Aber Du kannst die neue Karte gerne als neue Version der bisherigen hochladen, und wenn Du für die neue einen LA stellst, widerspreche ich nicht. -- Aisano (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Sollte jemand wirklich mal die alte Version brauchen, dann kann er sich die ja immer noch aus der Versionshistorie rausholen. --Vuxi (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Mangfalltalbahn, Karte Dezember 2014.png

File:Mangfalltalbahn, Karte Dezember 2014.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vuxi (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Fotomapping in OpenStreetMap

Hallo, dürfen deine Bilder zum Fotomapping in OpenStreetMap verwendet werden, d.h. die dargestellten Dinge werden mit Hilfe von Satellitenbilder eingezeichnet und ihre Eigenschaften erfasst? --Rolf Eike Beer (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

@Rolf Eike Beer: Hallo, was ist denn dieses Fotomapping? Ich kenne das "Dieses und weitere Bilder auf OpenStreetMap" (über tools.wmflabs.com), aber dazu braucht man ja nur Koordinaten anzugeben (was ich nach Möglichkeit tue). Du meinst anscheinend etwas anderes? Was müsste ich da tun? Gibt es einen Beschreibungstext? -- Aisano (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

@Aisano: Du müsstest gar nichts tun außer ja sagen ;) Ich (oder jemand anderes) würde sich ein Bild nehmen, von dem er die ungefähre Position kennt, und die abgebildeten Dinge in OSM taggen. Also z.B. die Eigenschaften dieses Signals eintragen, das würde dann am Ende etwa so aussehen. --Rolf Eike Beer (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

@Rolf Eike Beer: Ich habe gar nichts dagegen. Ich mache die Fotos ja, damit vielleicht jemand was damit anfangen kann, und das sieht ganz nützlich aus. Also nur zu.

Wenn Du mir auf meiner Seite schreibst, brauchst du übrigens kein {{Reply to}}. -- Aisano (talk) 20:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Danke! --Rolf Eike Beer (talk) 21:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Detaliu1.jpg

Bon soir,

la 2013-04-19 tu as ajouté l'image Detaliu1.jpg à la catégorie Bridge of Lies, Sibiu,

J'ai vue le pont des mensonges beaucoup de fois mais je n'y ai jamais remarqué une pièce de bois (il est fait de fer de fonte). Est-ce que tu es sur? Où se trouverait ce meneau bien formidable?

-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Guten Abend,

Entschuldigt meine Deutsch, aber mein Esperanto ist noch schlimmer.

Ich bin nicht der Autor von Detaliu1.jpg, ich habe gerade von der rumänischen wikipedia übertragen. Ich hielt die Beschreibung des originalen Fotografen.

Ich bin damit einverstanden, ein Stück aus Holz auf einer Brücke aus Eisen bizarr scheint. In meiner Erinnerung ist diese Skulptur auf dem Platz auf der anderen Seite des "hala a macelarilor" befindet.

Sie können den Hintergrund des Bildes mit dem roten Haus oben auf diesem Bild zu vergleichen. Wann ich sicher bin, würde ich sagen, dass es das Ziel ist, die hinter dem Zelt überschreitet ...

Keine Problem fur mich, ob Sie die Kategorie ändern.

--Zeugma fr (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

PS:Félicitation pour ton français, qui, même si il n'est pas complètement parfait, est parfaitement compréhensible !

@Zeugma fr: Salut, et merci de m'écrire en allemand. Comme mon français est « compréhensible » pour toi je continue de t'ecrire dans cette langue; je suis bien conscient que je suis loin d'être parfait mais, selon mon expérience, l'espéranto aide beaucoup pour s'exprimer de manière compréhensible (pas toujours correcte) dans des autres langues, avec un répertoire bien limité.

Evidemment tu n'es pas l'auteur de la photo mais il est interessant que c'était l'auteur original qui l'a déclaré «pont des mensonges». C'est une théorie interessante que la sculpture soit l'objet vertical derriere du parasol sur cette photo de la maison des arts (casa artelor) mais je crois que ce soit seulement un autre parasol, celui-ci fermé.

Je vais changer la catégorie, et peut-être quelqu'un va identifier la sculpture tôt ou tard…

-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

{{Monument istoric}}

Hi. This template should only be added in the category completely matching the monument, since a robot uses the data to add the category in the lists (which in turn means that new images uploaded from the lists already have the correct category). For instance, Category:Castra Apulum, porta principalis dextra is a subcategory of Category:Castra Apulum, which has the code AB-I-m-A-00001.01 , so it shouldn't have the same code itself.--Strainu (talk) 06:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

@Strainu: Bine, înțeleg. Mulțumesc -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:GPS-Verbot, 1.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GPS-Verbot, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Thanks for pointing this out but I do not understand what is missing or contradictory. Just in case the objects depicted are under somebody's copyright I mentioned {{FoP-Austria}}. But since the image is not just a 2D copy of a 2D object it also contains a (marginal) contribution from myself as photographer, so I gave it

• {{Self-photographed}}, and
• {{cc-zero}}.

What else can/should I do?

-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Sorry. I just noticed that I added cc-zero only after your warning. The system somehow still showed me your message as unread, and after six weeks I had forgotten. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Weilheim, Münchner Straße 30, 1.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Weilheim, Münchner Straße 30, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 11:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Geiselgasteig, Robert-Koch-Str 34, 1.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Geiselgasteig, Robert-Koch-Str 34, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Geiselgasteig, Gabriel-von-Seidl-Str 41a (Larisch), 1.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bregenz, Kirche Maria Hilf vom Gebhardsberg, 1.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bregenz, Kirche Maria Hilf vom Gebhardsberg, 1.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Máte to v kapse.jpeg

http://www.itesco.cz/cs/qr ist Dekodierung des QR-Codes. (QR Droid auf meinem Handy liest es. Online-Dekoder scheinen nicht zu wirken.) BartekChom (talk) 21:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

@BartekChom: Dziękuję! -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Linz, Kremsmünsterer Stifthaus, 15.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Linz, Kremsmünsterer Stifthaus, 15.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Linz, Turm der Landhauskirche, 1.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montegiardino, blazono, 1.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Amoklauf in München am 22. Juli 2016, 4.png

File:Amoklauf in München am 22. Juli 2016, 4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Charmbook (talk) 17:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)