User talk:Robert Flogaus-Faust/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxalis pes-caprae RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvia fruticosa 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 13:53, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cytinus ruber RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 19:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traunsteinera globosa RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Very small, but ok --Poco a poco 13:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamium maculatum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abutilon theophrasti RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Sumpf-Kratzdistel

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis und Danke fürs Verschieben!--Rosa-Maria Rinkl (talk) 16:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veratrum album RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 08:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus corniculatus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reseda lutea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atractylis cancellata 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedicularis rostratospicata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support GQ --Palauenc05 22:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silene dioica RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amaranthus blitoides RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduus personata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main part of the photo --Michielverbeek 20:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plantago media RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 22:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:31, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linaria dalmatica 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taraxacum spec RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cornus sanguinea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality Rodhullandemu 18:30, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Robert - do you have an exact location for File:Pinus contorta var contorta RF.jpg, please? If it is growing naturally, it will be subsp. contorta, except for uniquely on the banks of the Fraser River, where some subsp. latifolia growing from seed washed downstream from the interior occurs. If it is a planted tree, then it is probably subsp. contorta (from the relatively slender needles), though not identifiable with complete certainty; it should be moved to Category:Pinus contorta (cultivated)‎. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

I have no idea whether the tree was planted or whether it was not, but the photograph is from Richmond Nature Park. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 13:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Excellent, thanks! That places it as a natural site, not planted, and part of the 'infamous' Lulu Island provenance, which turned out to be subsp. latifolia, unlike other coastal origins. Infamous, as it was heavily sourced for seed (readily accessible, so cheap to harvest!) for forestry planting in UK in the period 1950-1970, and resulted in failed crops as it was so ill-adapted to the UK's oceanic climate. I'll add some notes to the photo page. - MPF (talk) 20:39, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viola canina RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 23:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamium album RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I like the bee in the flower! --Rodhullandemu 12:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heracleum austriacum subsp siifolium RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments small photo, but good quality --Michielverbeek 13:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussilago farfara 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 00:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrysosplenium alternifolium 5 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamium purpureum 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:36, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ficaria verna 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysichiton americanus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 21:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulsatilla alpina subsp alba RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ajuga pyramidalis 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arctium tomentosum 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daphne striata 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arctium tomentosum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 23:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirsium eriophorum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aruncus dioicus 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment It seems a bit underexposed to me. Can you make it a bit brighter? --Domob 15:15, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
  Done dark background is somwwhat brighter now --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:12, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
  Support Thanks, good quality to me now. --Domob 08:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fraxinus ornus 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 23:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Fehlbestimmung

Hallo, danke für die Nachricht! Ich bin keine Biologin. Somit wird Ihre Einschätzung vermutlich stimmen.--Rosa-Maria Rinkl (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana punctata 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxifraga oppositifolia 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primula integrifolia 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ranunculus glacialis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana punctata 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primula integrifolia RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxifraga oppositifolia 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana punctata 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geum reptans 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana orbicularis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 16:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gymnadenia conopsea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirsium heterophyllum 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirsium heterophyllum 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Idaea aversata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thalictrum aquilegiifolium 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lacerta bilineata male RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corydalis solida 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lathyrus vernus 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea triumfettii RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful composition and good quality -- Spurzem 12:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Horseshoe vetch

Hallo Robert, Dein Foto "Horseshoe vetch", das Du soeben bei den QI vorgestellt hast, muss wahrscheinlich um 90° gegen den Uhrzeigersinn gedreht werden. Jedenfalls sieht es auf meinem Monitor so aus. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Spurzem, vielen Dank für Deine Meinung! Allerdings war dieser Hufeisenklee eine nahezu niederliegende Pflanze auf felsigem Untergrund. Ich habe ihn im Querformat fotografiert und finde, dass dies die Art des Wuchses dieser Pflanze besser ausdrückt als ein (natürlich ebenso mögliches) Hochformat, bei dem die Blüten in der gewohnten Weise oben dargestellt werden. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:40, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Interessant! Ich hätte gewettet, das Bild liege auf der Seite, und die Wette wahrscheinlich verloren. Trotzdem: Dass sich die Blüte nicht ein wenig nach der Sonne richtet, ist erstaunlich. -- Spurzem (talk) 22:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
PS: Ich habe mir das Bild noch mal angeschaut und glaube, ich würde die Wette doch gewinnen. Ich riskiere es aber nicht. ;-) -- Spurzem (talk) 22:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chamaecytisus hirsutus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhodothamnus chamaecistus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussilago farfara 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 00:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scirpus sylvaticus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alnus alnobetula subsp alnobetula RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium pyrenaicum 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium robertianum 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhamnus pumila RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chelidonium majus 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 01:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamium maculatum 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adoxa moschatellina RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:50, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arum maculatum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxalis acetosella RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 20:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Neottia nidus-avis

@Robert Flogaus-Faust:
Guten Abend Robert Flogaus-Faust, ich möchte Dir eine kurze Erklärung zukommen lassen, warum ich bei Neottia nidus-avis die "hässliche" Überschrift bei den Kapselfrüchten wiederhergestellt habe.
Die alte Überschrift ist, wie bei Blüten etc. auf dieser Seite, ein Link zu einer Unterkategorie, in der weitere Bilder vorhanden sind.
Außerdem möchte ich erwähnen, dass ich stets mit viel Freude Deine ausgezeichneten Bilder betrachte.
Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 21:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo @Orchi: , danke für die Mitteilung. Leider wurde (wenigstens bei mir) der Link zur gewünschten Kategorie im Klartext angezeigt und der einzige funktionierende Link ging zu englischen Wikipedia. Eigentlich sah Deine Überschrift auf den ersten Blick konsequent aus, verglichen mit den anderen Überschriften, die funktionieren. Nur führt leider das verwendete Templat {{LanSwFruits}} (von Dir als {{LanSwfruit}} benutzt, was ebenso klappt) üblicherweise selbst zu einem Link, vgl. Template:LanSwFruits, und zwar auf en:Capsule_(botany). Ich hoffe, dass ich das jetzt endlich wirklich verbessert habe und nicht nochmals verschlimmbessert. Meine vorschnelle erste "Lösung" sah zwar richtig aus, hat aber immer noch nur auf die Seite aus der englischen Wikipedia verlinkt. Bitte überprüfe, ob Überschrift und Link bei Dir jetzt auch korrekt sind. Mit freundlichen Grüßen (und bestem Dank für den Hinweis und das Lob für meine Bilder) --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Hallo @Robert Flogaus-Faust: , bei der von einigen Usern gewünschten und vollzogenen Umbenennung von "- fruits" zu "(fruit)" war Neottia wohl vergessen worden. Mir hat es den Vorteil gebracht, dass ich durch Deine letzte Änderung dazu lernen konnte, so dass ich mein neu erworbenes Wissen heute bei der Erstellung der Unterkategorie zu den "roots" anwenden konnte. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 17:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Setaria verticillata 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Setaria verticillata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium pyrenaicum 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 17:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papaver alpinum subsp rhaeticum 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality, beautiful flower --Zcebeci 18:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armeria alpina RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linaria alpina RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium martagon 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium martagon 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherleria sedoides 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:01, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leontopodium nivale subsp alpinum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Misopates orontium RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echium vulgare RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Robert, zuerst sorry für die Nominierung, ich hatte nicht gesehen, dass die ID noch ein Thema war. Ich habe ein bisschen Recherche gemacht und bin doch zum Ergebnis gekommen, dass es sich um Buddleja davidii 'fortune' handeln muss. Meine Kenntnisse in dem Umfeld sind aber extrem überschaubar. Wieso hast du ausgeschlossen, dass es um Buddleja davidii gehen könnte? Viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 07:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Hallo @Poco a poco: , ich kann meine Vorbehalte gegen eine Zuordnung zu Buddleja davidii leider auch nicht mehr nachvollziehen. Ich hatte mir bei der letzten Nominierung des Bildes mal [1] angesehen. Ich habe meine Vorbehalte gegen eine Zuordnung zu Buddleja davidii daher auf Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list durchgestrichen. User:Salicyna hat bereits im März das Bild in Category:Unidentified Buddleja geschoben und die Pflanze für eine mögliche Buddleja alternifolia erklärt (vgl. den Eintrag im "Edit summary" des Edits von User:Salicyna gemäß [2]. Für meinen Kenntnisstand sieht man einfach zu wenig von der Pflanze für eine sichere Bestimmung über die Gattung hinaus. Buddleja davidii ist aber sicher die häufigste verwilderte Buddleja-Art in Deutschland. In einem Garten hat das natürlich wenig zu besagen. Auf keinen Fall würde ich das Bild ohne triftigen Grund einer Kulturvarietät zuordnen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 09:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collomia grandiflora RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primula latifolia 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tofieldia calyculata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments That's really good! Is that a focus stack or a single shot? -- Ikan Kekek 02:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
It is a single shot. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 06:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
  Comment I'm impressed! -- Ikan Kekek 10:57, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gonepteryx rhamni on Cirsium arvense RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvia nemorosa RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anchusa officinalis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anchusa officinalis 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduus nutans RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 23:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduus nutans 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduus nutans 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Filipendula vulgaris 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamium purpureum 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alliaria petiolata 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamum purpureum 5 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellaria media 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cucullia lactucae 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allium carinatum subsp carinatum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea nervosa RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support A bit unbalanced (I'd crop a bit more on the left) but ok --Poco a poco 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea nervosa 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirsium vulgare RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirsium vulgare 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 12:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acer platanoides 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orobanche flava RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia carniolica 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 18:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teucrium chamaedrys RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO link in "other versions" not correct, otherwise OK. --F. Riedelio 09:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Why is this wrong? The linked image is derived from the very same photograph. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
  Comment AFAIK "other versions" means: Links to other files with very similar content or derived files. --F. Riedelio 10:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
  Done Thanks for pointing this out. You are most probably right. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anacamptis pyramidalis 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good DOF and color. --Discostu 22:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trifolium campestre RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Favratia zoysii RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 12:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teucrium montanum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 21:42, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primula spectabilis 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cotinus coggygria RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coronilla coronata 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:14, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bunias orientalis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 02:04, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anemone pulsatilla RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anemone pulsatilla 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamium album 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tremella mesenterica RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stachys officinalis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araneus diadematus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cornus sanguinea 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chelidonium majus 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:05, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Renaming File:Aнемо́на дібро́вна (Anemone nemorosa).jpg

I have a problem with this name (with combining-diacritical-marks) :( I don't know how to resolve it :( Wieralee (talk) 08:12, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maniola jurtina RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality Lmbuga 17:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reseda phyteuma RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veronica prostrata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leopoldia comosa 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orchis militaris 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ophrys holosericea 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris pseudacorus 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cuscuta europaea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula glomerata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dryas octopetala 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 14:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium pratense 5 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 14:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arctostaphylos uva-ursi 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dryas octopetala RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erica carnea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salix reticulata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hepatica nobilis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Slightly too dark IMO. --Ermell 13:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Globularia nudicaulis

Image I took the photo in the Botanical Garden in Krakow. It was signed Globularia nudicaulis. Maybe someone changed the inscription? But there was no other Globularia Selso (talk) 15:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

I accept your decision. It is bad with the inscriptions in the botanical garden in Krakow. I already had a few problems with the inscriptions in this garden. Selso (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulicaria dysenterica RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 14:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euphorbia cyparissias RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jasione montana RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 15:00, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus vernus subsp albiflorus 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus vernus subsp albiflorus 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leucojum vernum 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ajuga chamaepitys RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saturnia pavoniella male RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality --LexKurochkin 17:38, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostrya carpinifolia 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. (According to the period and the camera used, IMO, it is a QI even if the image is less than 2MP) --Terragio67 15:37, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hepatica nobilis 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hepatica nobilis 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anacridium aegyptium RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parietaria judaica 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:16, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parietaria judaica RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK --Peulle 09:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hippocrepis emerus 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maniola jurtina 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malva neglecta RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cymbalaria muralis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anemone sylvestris RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primula vulgaris 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daphne cneorum 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carlina acaulis 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carlina acaulis 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erica carnea 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamium purpureum 7 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 19:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanguisorba officinalis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acer monspessulanum 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 13:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odontites luteus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gymnadenia conopsea 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cirsium arvense RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oedipoda caerulescens 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berberis vulgaris 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula excisa 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula excisa 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:52, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hyssopus officinalis 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula scheuchzeri RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula scheuchzeri 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --MVmath20 10:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carlina acaulis 5 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea cyanus RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduus acanthoides 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 22:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phyteuma globulariifolium subsp pedemontanum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 22:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduus acanthoides 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GoldenArtists 22:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
User:GoldenArtists has much less than 50 edits. Therefore, their vote is invalid. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carduus acanthoides RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:44, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2023

Hallo Robert Flogaus-Faust, ich habe bemerkt, dass du Bilder von und über Österreich hochgeladen hast, etwa Melampyrum arvense 2 RF.jpg, die wunderbar in unseren jährlichen Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim 2023 passen würden. Ich finde es schade, dass du deine Bilder nicht für den Wettbewerb nominiert hast, es würde den Wettbewerb bunter und breiter gestalten und deinen Bildern mehr Sichtbarkeit geben. Bilder nehmen automatisch am Wettbewerb teil, wenn du sie über Wikidaheim.at oder über eine der vielen Listen (Denkmallisten, Naturdenkmäler, Public Art, Immaterielles Kulturerbe, etc.) hochladest. Bilder, die nach dem 1. Juli hochgeladen wurden, können nachträglich mit dem Baustein {{WikiDaheim}} im passenden Themenbereich nominiert werden. Zu Regeln und Preisen siehe bitte WikiDaheim 2023. Der Wettbewerb läuft noch bis 8. Oktober.

Wir suchen auch noch Juror*innen für die Vorjury. Die Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb und die Tätigkeit in der Vorjury schließen sich nicht aus, da du deine eigenen Bilder nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt bekommst. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Hallo User:Herzi Pinki, danke für die Hinweise. Ich werde eine Teilnahme über den Baustein in Erwägung ziehen, falls ich für ein neu hochgeladenes Bild aus einem österreichischen Schutzgebiet den Qualitätsbild-Status erhalte. Die bisher hochgeladenen Bilder kommen da wohl leider nicht in Frage. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Umbenennung von Anchusa arvensis in Lycopsis arvensis?

Hallo @Robert Flogaus-Faust, findest Du es für angebracht, alle Bilder aus Benutzer:AnRo0002/Boraginaceae umzubenennen und auch aus der Kategorie Anchusa herauszunehmen? Gruß anro (talk) 13:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Hallo anro, die Galerieseite ist derzeit ja noch bei Anchusa arvensis und etliche Wikipedien (z. B. die englische und die polnische) verwenden ebenfalls noch Anchusa arvensis als gültigen Namen. Da aber die deutsche Wikipedia und Commons aus molekulargenetischen Gründen zu Linnés altem Namen Lycopsis arvensis zurückgekehrt sind, würde ich beide Namen in der Description aufführen und die Bilder aus den Unterkategorien von Category:Anchusa herausnehmen, also z. B. aus Category:Anchusa in Hockenheim und aus Category:Anchusa in the Northern Hemisphere in January. Du machst ja außerdem mit "|taxon" eine große Überschrift hinein. Da diese auf die Kategorie verlinkt, wäre es natürlich schöner, "|taxon = Anchusa arvensis" durch "|taxon = Lycopsis arvensis" zu ersetzen, um bei einem Klick darauf nicht gleich auf einer Weiterleitung zu landen. Ich persönlich lasse nie Bilder umbenennen, nur weil da ein verständliches Synonym des gültigen Artnamens steht. Der alte Name ist doch auch verständlich, auch wenn die Molekulargenetiker es mal wieder etwas anders haben wollen als bisher. Auf Deiner persönlichen Seite Benutzer:AnRo0002/Boraginaceae sollte es sehr einfach sein, die Bilder ebenfalls aus der Gattung Anchusa zu nehmen. Viele Grüße --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astragalus cicer RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papaver rhoeas RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality --Tagooty 02:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chondrilla juncea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 21:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Robert Flogaus-Faust/Archive 2".