User talk:Tobias ToMar Maier/Archive 1

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Typical basic sewing patterns of tights (hosiery).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Headbands brown with comb and red with dots.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Useful pic, but DoF too shallow and too much noise for a studio shot, sorry --Kreuzschnabel 21:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
  Done Reshoot with f/18. Had to add graduated filter in post to compensate the very uneven light wich by accindet brought out more detail on the red. Also bumped up the Luminance to 50 on the Noise Reduction. --GMLSX 02:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
New version OK now --Kreuzschnabel 05:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaclava 3 hole black rolled up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments So who is this terrorist? --Mattbuck 23:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaclava 3 hole black.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Concord Eye-Q 1M Camera front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Concord Eye-Q 1M Camera rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Concord Eye-Q 1M Camera card slot usb rs232 view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Re: 2014-08-23 NADT Josh Phillips Mpact 1.JPG

Hey, it's fine. Why would you have struck your oppose, out of curiosity? <3 Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 02:34, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Because of your explanation. Would not have thought of the change of direction without reading it. You should still extend the image description with it. Besides what is \o/ supposed to mean? Google can't find it.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 11:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
As in I should explain the blur towards the rear of the car in the description? If you think I should do that then I will. :) Also "\o/" means someone with their arms up in the air (the slashes as arms, the "o" as the head); it's an expression of being very happy. :) Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 15:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Sure. Will add to the educational value and may prevent people from being scared of submit images of identical situations.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 15:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon Zoom Lens EF 35-70mm 1to3.5-4.5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support God quality--Lmbuga 01:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iller water stair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A nice motif. There is some chromatic noise to remove. Also a lot of blurry birdspots in the sky. --Cccefalon 17:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  Done--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Excuse me, the chromatic noise is still not handled. --Cccefalon 05:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  Done If you think there is still heavy noise in the water: look at what is being reflected--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 12:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations for your latest version! You tackled the problem. Very good now! --Cccefalon 13:46, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catholic parish church St. Agatha in Kimratshofen - Altusried - Bavaria - Germany. West view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok. --Cccefalon 03:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Late 1980s thong leotard gusset detail soft shadow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much better! Works for me. --Cccefalon 03:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

QIC

Hallo Tobias, would you look for the "Fountain in the spa garden of Bad Wörishofen, Germany -- Spurzem 22:04, 3 November 2014" once more please? The CAs are removed. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done--Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuggerweiher 20150207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. A very, very fine work! --Hubertl 17:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Nürnberg

Kannst du dich bitte bei Commons:15. Fotoworkshop/Anmeldung eintragen? --Ralf Roleček 13:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspenkapelle Babenhausen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedhofskirche St. Maria-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedhofskirche St. Maria-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality;--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:54, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspenkapelle Babenhausen-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Johann Jaritz 06:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspenkapelle Babenhausen-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspenkapelle Babenhausen-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:07, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andreas Babenhausen Taube.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality. The left side is leaning out a bit. Do you think, you can improve that more? --Cccefalon 09:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
  Done--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:48, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fürstliche Gruft für Karl Fugger Babenhausen-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Light panel inserted into the walkway - made by hess-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 11:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fürstliche Gruft für Karl Fugger Babenhausen-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak   Support --Hubertl 11:39, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle (Weinried)-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 04:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche St Andreas Babenhausen Schwaben 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be a bit sharper at the top, but acceptable for QI --DXR 13:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle (Weinried) Painting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality --Halavar 09:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Babenhausen (Swabia) Stadtgasse view down.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cosplayer of Kurumi Tokisaki, Date A Live in Augsburg 20150418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality --Halavar 16:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Brauhaus Riegele.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pity about the top crop, but still QI for me. --Baresi franco 20:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brechtbühne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justizvollzugsanstalt Memmingen-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle (Weinried)-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Code 18:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaierberghof 2015 04 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Code 18:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justizvollzugsanstalt Memmingen-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle (Weinried) Inside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough detail and well-composed --Daniel Case 23:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Andreas (Babenhausen) Chandelier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but crop a bit tight --Moroder 06:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Deine Blitze

Moin "ToMar" , kannst Du mir bitte noch mal schreiben was Du für Blitze bzw. Zubehör benutzt und was Du an Deinem Zubehör noch verbessern würdest? Es eilt nicht, Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 11:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Ralf. Das werden in Zukunft 3 oder mehr manuelle Yongnuo YN560 III Aufsteckblitze, 1 Yongnuo 560-TX Funkfernsteuerung und 1 Yongnuo YN560 IV mit eigebeauter Funkfernsteuerung als Backup. Bei den Softboxen muss noch was besseres her als die kleine 20x20cm Universalsoftbox.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 06:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Moin Tobi, schau mal bei mir auf der Diskussion, welche Rat hast Du für mich. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 07:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tram in Augsburg waiting at traffic light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 22:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justizvollzugsanstalt Memmingen-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedestrian-related regulatory road sign Fußgänger in Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stair leading into the Iller but promising heaven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Altenschönegg 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. Crop at the bottom could be better. --XRay 05:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Large Iller water stair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Please have a look to the right. There are CAs.--XRay 05:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  Done--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 06:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sexodrom (Linz)-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Done--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 06:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Good quality. --Hubertl 22:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sexodrom (Linz)-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment Strong CA at the top and according to the rules the verticals have to be rectilinear. --Code 18:09, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  Done--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 06:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  Support Good quality now. --Code 07:24, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Andreas (Babenhausen) - Stair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Andreas (Babenhausen) - rear hallway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Andreas (Babenhausen) Lights pointing towards the ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Andreas (Babenhausen) - cross hanging from the ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Andreas (Babenhausen) view into the Apse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Andreas (Babenhausen) - rear storage room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 16:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unser Lieben Frauen (Lauben) last supper wood carving.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 20:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unser Lieben Frauen (Lauben) Chandelier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 01:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Simon und Judas Thaddäus (Holzgünz) Dove within the coffering.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Simon und Judas Thaddäus (Holzgünz) Organ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Simon und Judas Thaddäus (Holzgünz) - cross hanging from the ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 01:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justizanstalt Linz - Pochestraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--663highland 15:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Simon und Judas Thaddäus (Holzgünz) view into the Apse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Simon und Judas Thaddäus (Holzgünz) - eternal flame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Simon und Judas Thaddäus (Holzgünz) - Details on the left altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adalbert-Stifter-Gymnasium (Linz) - Facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtpfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt (Linz) - Chandelier 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Unusual, therefore not immediately promoted, but good for QI.--Jebulon 19:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Nachfrage zu Sony Alpha 7

Hallo Tobias,

Danke für Deine Antwort zu meiner Kamera-Nachfrage! Ich habe sie ebenfalls auf meiner Discussion-Seite beantwortet und schlage vor, dass wir das Gespräch (wie von Dir begonnen) dort fortführen. (Dies hier also nur als Hinweis.) Viele Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeppelintribüne - ceiling light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Code 21:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buick 1956 Special emblems.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haley Davidson Electra Glide Ultra Classic emblems front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Mustang Fastback 2015 Model.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harley-Davidson Electra Glide dashboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice all around --Daniel Case 05:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Ursus (Klosterbeuren) Noth-west side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Ursus (Klosterbeuren) corridor to pulpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Ursus (Klosterbeuren) war memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Lorean DMC-12 Back to the Future replica Mr. Fusion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:28, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Basilica - high altar - 20150808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspenkapelle Babenhausen 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City limit sign of Fucking, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caterpillar of European Peacock spotted near Fucking Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support OK. --C messier 10:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Andreas (Babenhausen) main high altar details with standig crucifix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compact fluorescent light bulbs 105W 36W 11W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crinkle dress stored away.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone Cross in Klosterbeuren Germany (Close up).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lomax 223 in Babenhausen (Swabia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Ursus (Klosterbeuren) view towards high altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 21:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Ursus (Klosterbeuren) view towards ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 21:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Ursus (Klosterbeuren) view towards high altar - close up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamingo Bar Linz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --Hubertl 23:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West wing of the former cloister in Klosterbeuren - north west side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! West wing of the former cloister in Klosterbeuren - west side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment IMO perspective correctio necessary. The building is leaning in. --XRay 06:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)   Comment Rotate and straightening done.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 09:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
  Support OK now. --XRay 12:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspenkapelle Babenhausen 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --C messier 00:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspenkapelle Babenhausen 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparda-Bank Augsburg - Main entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparda-Bank Augsburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cows grazing on the steep side of a mountain in bavaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American and Austrian muscle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Small group of Arion rufus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --SAplants 07:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Small group of Arion rufus - good view on the side hole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --SAplants 07:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Group of Arion rufus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --SAplants 07:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Searchlights - 113211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Ich war ja da... ;-) --Hubertl 20:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned cargo handling hall - structural detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catholic Parish Church St. Agatha- view towards the high altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is some motion blur on the woman at the back but in my opinion this image is OK for a QI. --Basotxerri 20:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residenz Kempten Kanzlei (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trike - decorated with printed foil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mobile bank branch - sparkasse - germany - NU HK 257 - side rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mobile bank branch - sparkasse - germany - NU HK 257 - side front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fürstäbtliche Residenz - Hallway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fürstäbtliche Residenz - Tagzimmer - Ceiling detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment IMHO, crop a bit too tight to the left (bow) and top (fire horn ?) Otherwise good. --C messier 15:20, 27 May 2016 (UTC)   Comment Tried a diffent crop. This is as far as I can go to the right.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:08, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
  Support Acceptable, IMHO. QI. --C messier 08:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kempten - Orgel über Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Peulle 16:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kempten - Decke über den beiden Orgeln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kempten - Blick zur Kuppel Richtung Hochaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kempten - Blick in die Kuppel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Christian Ferrer 07:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kempten - Openings in the architecture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kempten - Rechter Altar - Rechte Seite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justizvollzugsanstalt Augsburg-Gablingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archäologischer Garten (Augsburg) - JVA Augsburg Institution I - Kapelle St. Severin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schranne am Moritzplatz - Seitentür der Moritzkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schranne am Moritzplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me, but not perfect.. 3m back would have been good - if it has been possible) --Hubertl 03:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schienenreinigung in Augsburg - Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JVA Augsburg Institution II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 05:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justizvollzugsanstalt Augsburg-Gablingen - Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archäologischer Garten (Augsburg) - JVA Augsburg Institution I - Kapelle St. Severin - Hochformat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is ok, composition so so la la...third opinion appreciated --Hubertl 09:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)   Comment May there exist different opinions about compositions. In the end what counts is the quality. And that`s O.K. --Johann Jaritz 13:47, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unter der Schranne am Moritzplatz - Blick auf die Seitentür der Moritzkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door frame leading into the greenery behind the city walls of Augsburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunsthalle Kempten - Treppe Aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 06:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Mang (Kempten) - Sicht zur Decke Richtung Orgel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Code 05:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostern sculpture in Augsburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostern sculpture in front of the Großes Haus (Augsburg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Musketiere 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Königsplatz Augsburg - Meet me half way.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Section of a building inserted into the city walls of Augsburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwörmontag 2016-18-07 Menschen vor dem Schwörhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. W.carter 10:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Marauder Portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Kauffrau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fischerbrunnen in Memmingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Bevölkerung 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Bevölkerung 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reiterstandbild Welf VI - Fuggergarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Fahrendes Volk 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Margrit Holzinger Portrait.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Margrit Holzinger Portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Oberbürgermeister 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Größte Kanone mit Mensch als Vergleich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments At first I thought there was some weird perspective going on here! The man's face is a little blurred, but he is just there for comparion to the cannon which is nice and sharp, so QI for me. --W.carter 21:58, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Margrit Holzinger.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Margrit Holzinger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support OK. --C messier 10:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Musketiere 12 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Musketiere 11 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Since the motion blur is restricted to the drum stick (where the action is) I think that is ok. Over all a QI. W.carter 09:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Scots Brigade 4 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Scots Brigade 5 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Scots Brigade 1 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Musketiere 9 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment That Canon can shoot 20mpx and this is only just above 2. Any specific reason for this?--Peulle 08:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment  you ethier shoot what's far away or what's passing by the stairs.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 16:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Now that's a good reason for cropping if ever I saw one. It get s my vote.--Peulle 19:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
  Comment Excellent shot for the "Raincoat" article though. ;) W.carter 13:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostern sculpture on the morning of Easter Sunday 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 17:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

My butterfly images

I've just noticed you opposed two of my images on 9 May - one for what you say is 'diffraction blur' and one for 'focus miss'. By all means oppose my images, but please don't make innaccurate comments that imply a superior knowledge of macro photography. Charles (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

So what was it than? Those terms and causes are nothing new on QI review.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 22:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Just viewed some of your images. Awesome stuff. All well below the aperture limit of what your camera set up allows and you hit the animals instead of the dirt. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche (Augsburg) - view from the minstrels' gallery towards the apse (HDRI).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche (Augsburg) view into the apse (HDRI).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche (Augsburg) - view into the nave (HDRI).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche (Augsburg) - view towards the main entrance and pipe organ (HDRI).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herz-Jesu-Kirche (Augsburg) - view in front of the main altar upwards (HDRI).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 mid range pc in late 1990s case.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments An easy photo to make but it is a very sharp one. Also the light to the pc is well done with an excellent contrast. No doubts, a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 16:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Header connectors for USB3 and its forerunner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:35, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Gaukler 4 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Gaukler - Feuerschlucker - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Adel 6 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Gaukler 7 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Kaufleute 5 - Umzug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Gaukler 5 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Gaukler - Tanzlehrerin - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Gaukler 6 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memmingen - Wallenstein 2016 - Gaukler 12 - Auszug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Left crop is too tight, IMO, and I'd like an explanation as to why the resolution is so low.--Peulle 14:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 
That's why.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 18:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)  Support Accepted.--Peulle 13:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Return to the user page of "Tobias ToMar Maier/Archive 1".