Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Tokfo/arĥivo/2021

< User talk:Tokfo
Latest comment: 2 years ago by OgreBot in topic Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Tokfo/Clocks

File:Dsc 0271-panorama (49258423292).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Geh, es hat doch wenig Sinn, Bilder zu kopieren, wenn keinerlei Beschreibungsinformation vorhanden ist. Was ist auf dem Bild zu sehen? Neben dem Markuspalast vermutlich sind da im Hintergrund genug bemerkenswerte Gebäude, die du mittels Annotationen beschreiben könntest. Spezifischere Kategorien wären halt auch ein Hit. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

  • File:DSC 0667 (49258019236).jpg da wirds spannender. Was ist da auf dem Bild drauf? Bitte überprüfe alle deine Uploads vom 3. April zu Venedig auf sinnvolle Beschreibung und Annotierung.

Was ist der Mehrwert dieser Bilder? Im Vergleich zu einem? --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Unter anderem deshalb sind die Fotos ja auch in einer cleanup-Kategorie. Tokfo (talk) 05:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
wenn du eine Menge beinahe identer Fotos hochladest, wie schaut dann der Cleanup aus? Außerdem sind die Bilder schon fast eine Woche hochgeladen und du hast dich inzwischen ja wieder anderen Tätigkeiten zugewandt. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Es gibt hier keine Deadlines, ich kann mich damit beschäftigen, wann immer ich dafür Zeit habe (ich denke, mein bisheriges Verhalten über Jahre hinweg zeigt, dass ich meine Uploads sehr wohl kategorisiere). Wenn dich bestimmte Redundanzen stören, dann stell halt Löschanträge drauf, ich sehe Löschanträge nämlich nicht als persönliche Kränkungen an und habe auch nicht vor, als Reaktion darauf die Uploads von deren Antragstellern durchzugehen und dort nach Problemen zu suchen. Tokfo (talk) 15:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Du weißt so gut wie ich, dass Bilder nur dann gelöscht werden, wenn es exakte Duplikate sind (nebst den anderen Löschgründen, Zumüllen mit ähnlichen Bildern zählt nicht zu den Löschgründen). Solche Fastduplikate einfach nicht hochzuladen, ist die einfachste Art und Weise, um den Rattenschwanz an Kategorisierungen, Beschreibungen, zweitweise fehlenden Kategorisierungen und Beschreibungen und wenig erfolgversprechenden Löschanträgen zu vermeiden. Für die Welt und das Freie Wissen ist nix gewonnen, wenn solche Bilder nach Commons kopiert werden, bloß weil sie da sind, statt sie einer intelligenten Auswahl zu unterziehen und nur die sinnvolle Auswahl hochzuladen, JMHO. Deshalb haben die Bilder eine Cleanup-Kategorie legt nahe, dass du dich um die Löschung kümmmern wirst. Ist auch einfacher, wenn du das als Uploader zeitnah anstößt. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

File:DSC0798 (29615164944).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:DSC0798 (29615164944).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: acc. to exif: Viking owns all rights to images for unlimited time and usage/media, worldwide, for all images. Photographer retains right to use images for self-promo on own website, but may not refer to "Viking Cruises" as client without specific prior written permission. Photographer agrees not to share imagery for other self-promo in any media, including social media or online, without permission from Viking Cruises.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2013 Wien 0049 (8394415679).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2013 Wien 0049 (8394415679).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Tokfo (talk) 06:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2013 Wien 0373 (10387243305).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2013 Wien 0373 (10387243305).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Tokfo (talk) 06:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

File:2001 12 09 Wien 003 (50972482241).jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, du könntest doch die Dateien vor meinem Kategorisieren für das Löschen vorschlagen, würde mir viel Arbeit ersparen. z.B. [1]. Seit dem 1. Mai kugelt das File unbeachtet von dir herum, kaum greif ich es an, stellst du einen LA. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

File:2004 04 30 Wien 008 (51048731107).jpg ist doch sicher geschützt, was meinst du? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Ich reagiere auf das, was ich auf meiner Beobachtungsliste sehe. Wenn jemand (völlig egal wer, ich folge sicher nicht spezifisch deinen Bearbeitungen) Dateien in Kategorien einsortiert, die ich beobachte (das trifft auf die meisten zu, die ich irgendwann einmal bearbeitet habe), dann fallen sie mir auf und ich korrigiere die Kategorien evtl. nach oder evtl. schlage ich sie zur Löschung vor, aber ich habe heute definitiv nicht mehr die Zeit, proaktiv nach irgendetwas zu suchen. Was das Foto von der Weihnachtsbeleuchtung betrifft, glaubst du wirklich, dass da Schöpfungshöhe besteht? Bin mir da nicht so sicher. Tokfo (talk) 06:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Du könntest Category:All media needing categories as of 2021 auf deine BEO setzen, dann würde dein System trotzdem funktionieren.
Die Weihnachtsbeleuchtung ist von April. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Rollendes Material in Graz

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Tokfo, in [2] gibt es viele unkategorisierte Bilder von Grazer Straßenbahnen. Du kennst dich mit dem rollenden Material aus, magst du dich darum kümmern? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Mache ich beizeiten, wenn ich dazu komme und es niemand anderer vor mir macht. Tokfo (talk) 10:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

CityShuttle-Kategorien

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Tokfo, ich wollte dich fragen, ob es schlau wäre, alle Bilder aus der Überkategorie Category:Inlandsreisezugwagen der ÖBB in die Unterkategorien zu ordnen (zum Beispiel Category:ÖBB 80-73 oder Category:ÖBB 84-73). LG --Öffis Graz (talk) 18:15, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Hallo! Wo es spezifischere Kategorien gibt und wir uns sicher sind, welche davon auf eine Datei passt, sollten sie natürlich verwendet werden, dafür sind sie ja da. Ich kenne mich aber bei ÖBB-Waggontypen nicht ausreichend aus, dass ich Fotos, wo ich keine Typenbezeichnung lesen kann, danach kategorisieren könnte. Tokfo (talk) 18:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Kategorisierung File:Pfannbauernquelle.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Info: Habe die Kategorisierung zurückgenommen da nicht korrekt, alle Quellen in der gewählten Kat. gehören zur 2. Hochquellenwasserleitung, die Pfannbauernquelle jedoch zur 1.

Gruß --Geoprofi (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Pfk Gratkorn Fastenkreuze Corona2020.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bezüglich Special:Diff/594112994.

Ich hab das Bild zwar unscharf gemacht, aber die erste Version muss noch gelöscht werden. Bevor ich die Version lösche hätte ich aber mehr Konsens/Eindeutigkeit über die Rechtsauslegung gewunschen, bzw auch was alles unscharf gemacht werden soll. Sollte die DR abgeschlossen sein oder Einigkeit/Konsens (unter denen die "genug" Rechtswissen haben) über das Bild herrschen, bitte ich dich mich an die Versionslöschung zu erinnern.

Siehst du die Urheberrechtsverletzung nur bei dem Bild, nur bei dem Text oder bei beiden?

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 07:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Ich bin mir da auch nicht so sicher, wie du dir das wahrscheinlich wünschen würdest, hätte aber zur Sicherheit beides unscharf gemacht. Ist ja kein völliger Allerweltstext ohne jegliche Kreativität. Tokfo (talk) 09:26, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

File:DSC 0232 (49251276311).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:DSC 0232 (49251276311).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Munf (talk) 10:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

File:DSC 0222 (49250808408).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:DSC 0222 (49250808408).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Munf (talk) 10:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Hong Kong Trams, September 2009-UKNqZzl2cu8.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Tokfo/Transport in Austria, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 4041 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC))

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Tokfo/Vienna, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 4079 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC))

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Tokfo/Transport in Austria, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 1638 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 18:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC))

Kann ich nicht nachvollziehen

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Da sieht man an sich den ganzen Opernring und du schmeißt diese Kategorie raus? Sorry, das kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. Gruß - Bwag (talk) 00:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Ist COM:OVERCAT zu Category:Oper, Karlsplatz tram stop. Du hast das Foto ursprünglich in Category:Tram track Ring–Kai–Ring und Category:Tram stops in Vienna kategorisiert, was ich etwas zweifelhaft gefunden habe, denn wirklich gut sieht man ja weder die Gleise noch die Straßenbahnhaltestelle, aber wenn, dann gehört das Foto natürlich in die Kategorie für die konkrete Straßenbahnhaltestelle, wo es aufgenommen wurde, nicht in diese allgemeinen Kategorien. Vorschlag: Wir entfernen Category:Oper, Karlsplatz tram stop und fügen Category:Opernring, Vienna wieder hinzu, aber lassen Category:Tram track Ring–Kai–Ring und Category:Tram stops in Vienna weg. Tokfo (talk) 09:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Passt! Gruß - Bwag (talk) 09:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
PS: Eventuell Kärntner Straße dazu, denn der eigentliche Standort ist ja Kärntner Straße/Kärntner Ring.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Tokfo/Clocks, has failed. Your gallery has a hard upper-limit of about 8000 files per day, while your gallery would have had 21543 files (including files already on the page).

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 02:09, 24 December 2021 (UTC))

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tokfo/arĥivo/2021&oldid=617864125"
Return to the user page of "Tokfo/arĥivo/2021".