Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, TommyMurf!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Bellurgan 1777.png

edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Bellurgan 1777.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Uploader asserts "own work". However, unless the uploader is more than 250 years old, and authored this work in 1777, how is that the case?

Guliolopez (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Dundalk Bellurgan Greenore Newry Railway.png

edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Dundalk Bellurgan Greenore Newry Railway.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Uploader asserts "own work". And that it can be released as "self/cc-by-sa-4.0". However, this image appears to be a republication of a 19th century or 20th century railway route map - likely authored/published by someone associated with the railway. How does "own work" apply?

Guliolopez (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @TommyMurf. I have attempted to correct the licence/authorship/etc for this railway map. As the original/source image also appears to be on Commons. Can you look at the others please? Guliolopez (talk) 13:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
How can I change this, do I need to delete the photos and attach them again? I cant see how to delete them either? TommyMurf (talk) 11:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
As on Wikipedia, if you need to edit the details of content on Wikimedia, just click the "edit" button at the top of the page/entry. For example, for the File:Bellurgan 1777.png file, you'd just click into the page, click the "edit" button. And perhaps change the licence header from {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} to something more accurate. Maybe {{PD-Art|PD-old-100-expired}} or similar. As with other old maps in the category Category:18th-century maps of Ireland. If there is no valid alternative licence, and you believe an image you uploaded shouldn't be on Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted, tag it with {{SD|G7}}. Guliolopez (talk) 15:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Bellurgan comparison 2023.png

edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Bellurgan comparison 2023.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Uploader asserts "own work". However, this is clearly a work derived from a mapping source/software of some kind. How does "own work" apply?

Guliolopez (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Old Faughart Grave yard Map.png

edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Old Faughart Grave yard Map.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Uploader asserts "own work". However, this map is clearly taken from a scan of an earlier book/work. Did the uploader author that original book/work? How so?

Guliolopez (talk) 12:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply