Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Вайдагубский маяк.jpg

File:Вайдагубский маяк.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2022 at 20:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 20:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me nothing that special, DoF is shallow, sorry. --A.Savin 10:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the mood here but A. Savin is correct that the depth of field is just too shallow Cmao20 (talk) 12:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The tension between the two red objects is interesting. The foreground does not have to be sharp for me.--Ermell (talk) 22:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support like Ermell --Stepro (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ermell. And very atmospheric. --Aristeas (talk) 05:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Depth of field seems correct, otherwise the bushes would mess up the composition. Additionally it is a difficult condition and low light.--Wilfredor (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Correct use of selective focus. Great subject and moment. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- It has an atmospheric quality. Dinkum (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice compo and atmospheric image indeed, I also think the DoF is ok here for that kind of compo, but the sign on left prevent me to support. Nice though. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin. -- Karelj (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Christian Ferrer. -- Wolf im Wald 23:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Savin. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me as an atmospheric shot. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks like the establishing shot of some arctic thriller. I don't mind the DoF -- it's on the objects, and the shallowness comes close to a tilt-shift effect, which I find interesting to look at. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 11:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia