Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Almabtrieb der Schafe 2014 in Schoppernau 04.JPG

File:Almabtrieb der Schafe 2014 in Schoppernau 04.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2014 at 11:35:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Almabtrieb der Schafe 2014 in Schoppernau c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 11:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 11:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Superb scene! ArionEstar (talk) 11:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support We want more like this. Yann (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:10, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral nice but not very sharp.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice, but IMO too noisy (ISO 2.000) and too unsharp (f/2.8)--XRay ^talk 07:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. I actually appreciate the f/2.8 aperture as it helps to give focus on the four people in the front and separate them from the background. It gives a sense of depth to the herd. Quite noisy and not that sharp in full resolution, but it is also a pic of very high resolution. I find that in a more modest 4 Mpixel review size, the four persons are sharp and no noise is apparent. The exposure time of 1/1600 s and ISO 2000 is a rather odd combination though for this shot. -- Slaunger (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 11:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The exposure choice certainly doesn't seem optimal but I guess that was a mistake made in the rush to grab the scene. There is too much tree above for my taste, and I think at 2:1 aspect crop would improve the image. -- Colin (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- A 2:1 aspect ratio is a good idea. I can support that. -- Slaunger (talk) 18:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jiel (talk) 10:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 18:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough and too noisy for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Focus too far behind the people in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 12:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a great scene! --Plani (talk) 09:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice scene, but sharpness is not good enough for me. --Ivar (talk) 14:56, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree the scene is worth catching but the composition isn't great and the sharpness issues -- all the hallmarks of a hurried shot that didn't work out 100%. -- Colin (talk) 15:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per the other opposers.--Jebulon (talk) 09:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /J e e 08:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]