Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cologne Germany Kranhaus-03.jpg

File:Cologne Germany Kranhaus-03.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2016 at 21:39:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created - uploaded by Cccefalon - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Striking vista, and well-taken, but the colors look so unappealing. Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors of a night (0:31). EXIF data should be fixed. --XRay ^talk 06:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are we sure about those being "night" colors? Cologne is at 50º N ... certainly far enough north to have short nights that time of year, but not white nights (and even if it does, I doubt they are this bright at 12:30 a.m.) Daniel Case (talk) 07:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Irony. --A.Savin 09:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info It's Malaysia time in the EXIF. I often forget to switch my cam back to German time when coming back from Asia. For the same reason, I always tag my uploads only with the date and not with the time. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (weak) I think the view (+light) is a bit too ordinary. Also, the sharpness is below Ccefaloin's usual high level. Sorry --A.Savin 09:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose great view but dull colors, sorry --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info The colors are exactly as they are in the new harbour quarter. The crane houses are just concrete grey. Severinsbruecke is in light green as it should be. The photo was taken from a ship after a rain shower when sky was still partly covered with clouds. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I know and I don't blame you. A sunny morning might have been better though. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support very good work. Great composition (the architecture, the Rhine, the boat, the cathedral). 70% of the day weather- and lightconditions are like this one. --Hubertl 10:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Flat colors IMO. A pity, the rest is good.--Jebulon (talk) 16:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Hubertl. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Jebulon. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I doubt that the “dull colours” are a shortcoming of the photo; quite the contrary, they are a virtue of the photo for the desired “vivid colours” do not distract attention away from interesting forms. I even think that these “vivid colours” can spoil the photo. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Support as per others. --Yann (talk) 12:04, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, unfortunately. I've seen too many photos of this place in much better light. — Julian H.^✈ 14:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great! What about nominating one of them in FPC?

--CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks, Christian, for nomination. I still think, that the colours are exactly as they should be. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]