Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Machecoul - Abbaye Notre-Dame-de-la-Chaume (1).jpg
File:Machecoul - Abbaye Notre-Dame-de-la-Chaume (1).jpg, not featured
editVoting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2012 at 21:04:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Selbymay (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Selbymay (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support I like it. Tomer T (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Isn't it a bit soft ? --MAURILBERT (discuter) 04:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- SupportGood -- Raghith 08:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Nice, good composition. TrebleSeven (talk) 11:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Isn't it a bit yellow ?--Jebulon (talk) 11:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp (out of focus) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Carschten. I am suprised this made it through QI. Saffron Blaze (talk) 10:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose nice, but I see too many unsharp areas at the main object. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose unnatural colours, not really sharp. --Berthold Werner (talk)
- Oppose Colors not ok. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support - color of the clouds and sky is perfectly plausible and natural, so I don't doubt the rest of the image is very similar in color to the actual scene at the time –Juliancolton | Talk 05:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support Colors OK for me. Yann (talk) 07:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Neutral The picture looks good when filling my full screen, but in full resolution it's not sharp. -- Achird (talk) 13:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose unfortunate composition, seems to be blurry in full resolution. --LC-de (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)