Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Reichstagsgebäude mit Weihnachtsbaum bei Nacht, Berlin, 151223, ako.jpg
File:Reichstagsgebäude mit Weihnachtsbaum bei Nacht, Berlin, 151223, ako.jpg, featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2016 at 20:46:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Info The Reichstag building in Berlin at night with a Christmas tree in front of it. Left of the Reichstag, the International Trade Centre (Friedrichstrasse) and the television tower (Alexanderplatz) can be seen. The bright thing above the television tower is the moon. The cupola of the Reichstag building was designed by Norman Foster. All by me. -- Code (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Code (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Support- I find the composition good enough to feature. I predict that someone will object to the inclusion of the poles in the right foreground, but I not only find it fine to include them but value them as helping my eyes to move laterally to the left. One of my favorite living painters, Stanley Lewis, likes to paint things like fences and construction materials and makes beautiful compositions with them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, I know what you mean. First I thought I should clone the poles out but on the other hand - well, they really exist. I made some other pictures from different perspectives but this one was the best, even with the poles. But of course I could understand if someone would object them. --Code (talk) 08:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support wirklich sehr gut! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry: I appreciate your effort, because it is not easy nowadays to get the Reichstag on a photo the way that those ugly containers at the right do not disturb. But for an FP, the highlights are too blown for me and the crop too generous. I think that for an extremely widely photographed building like that, we need something really outstanding for an FP. --A.Savin 13:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 13:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support Merry Xmas! --Hubertl 15:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support Nice detail and mood. Not without some imperfections, but most can be chalked up to being inevitable with the long exposure necessary to capture the building in this light. Daniel Case (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Fine quality image, but too much foreground for me. Charles (talk) 14:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with A.Savin. This is FP. We need the best of the best.--Jebulon (talk) 00:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: @PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ: @Charlesjsharp: @Daniel Case: @Hubertl: @Medium69: @A.Savin: @Pudelek: @Martin Falbisoner: @Llez: @Ikan Kekek: Thank you all for your votes and comments which help me a lot to improve my photographic skills. I made a different crop and cloned out the poles. I don't know if this version is better, it would be nice if you would give me some feedback on this. If you like the old version better, I'll revert the changes. Thank you again. --Code (talk) 06:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Thanks for pinging me. I much prefer the original version. This one has a lot of what seems to me to be empty dark space that isn't doing anything. If you really want to get rid of the poles and crop the file differently, I suggest you crop it much closer to the Reichstag building, so that there's much less dark grass and such. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- for me this version is OK --Pudelek (talk) 09:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for pinging me.- I prefer the first version of the December 23, 2015 which is more focused. Both version are of good quality--Pierre André (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I would crop to a panorama style - less foreground, less sky. Charles (talk) 10:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for pinging me.- I prefer the first version of the December 23, 2015 which is more focused. Both version are of good quality--Pierre André (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- for me this version is OK --Pudelek (talk) 09:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I'm fine with both versions, but maybe you should follow Charles' advice and crop to a panorama --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- I prefer the second. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 11:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Thanks for pinging me. I much prefer the original version. This one has a lot of what seems to me to be empty dark space that isn't doing anything. If you really want to get rid of the poles and crop the file differently, I suggest you crop it much closer to the Reichstag building, so that there's much less dark grass and such. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: @PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ: @Charlesjsharp: @Daniel Case: @Hubertl: @Medium69: @A.Savin: @Pudelek: @Martin Falbisoner: @Llez: @Ikan Kekek: Ok everybody, sorry for pinging you again. I made the crop suggested by Charles, Martin and Ikan. Your opinions are appreciated. If there will be no consensus that this version is better, I'll revert to the first version. --Code (talk) 21:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I told you yesterday that I would appreciate a tighter crop. So it´s now what I suggested. --Hubertl 21:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- And you were right. Thanks for your suggestion. --Code (talk) 21:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'll support if you take out half the foreground of the new version. Charles (talk) 22:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment very good now --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support visually very successful, nice perspective, I like the puddle in the foreground at left, that's a plus Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Colin (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Rillke(q?) 01:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 01:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - I'd like to see the 1st version again, as I don't completely remember what it looked like. This newest version looks OK to me, but I still feel like there is perhaps too much empty black space in front of the building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: You can find the first version here. --Code (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- CommentThank you, Code. At full page resolution, I definitely prefer the original version because it has details that help me move my eye around the picture plane, whereas the newest version lacks the poles and cuts off some of the plants, and I even like the somewhat glary stuff to the right of the building for that purpose. To me, the original is much more interesting, and I will not vote for the new version to be featured. Have a great New Year, everyone! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you, Ikan. I understand your critique. I removed your support vote above. --Code (talk) 15:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture