User:Taivo/Archive22 Apr–Jun

Metamorphosis in the Slaughterhouse poster

edit

Hello there, No, it was permission, please see these resources.

http://javaddaraei.com/en/metamorphosis-in-the-slaughterhouse-to-go-on-screen-in-toronto/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13357022/mediaviewer/rm2498156545/ https://www.facebook.com/MS.MOVIESS/photos/pcb.147205810484046/147201137151180/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMIRNAGHSHI (talk • contribs) 17:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

I see poster behind all three links, but I do not see permission behind any one. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Uncontroversial deletion discussions needing closure

edit

Dronebogus (talk) 11:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

  Done Taivo (talk) 12:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I debate how file:Nude penis pic.png is “educational”. Clarify. Dronebogus (talk) 12:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
It's just like graffiti. I do not want to explain, what kind of educational value every image in category:Graffiti has, we simply collect graffities, when it is legal. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
I don’t think that’s a good analogy. Graffiti is an important part of urban culture that’s existed since at least the Roman Empire, whereas this is just a picture of a penis with “  <—— My Penis ~c==3” written next to it on the owner’s leg. Is this really an important phenomenon we need to document? Also note this is user’s only upload: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sanhooya2019 Dronebogus (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Of course I looked that. And this is not his only, but his last remaining upload (I deleted the second). Still I think, that it's good to document this phenomenon. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

AÕ rikkumine

edit

See pilt on Äripäevast. Kruusamägi (talk) 08:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

  Kustutasin. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Siin on ka üks potentsiaalne AÕ rikkumine. Suhtled äkki üleslaadijaga? Kruusamägi (talk) 18:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Ning küsitavad on ka kasutaja Bussid üleslaadimised. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Kasutaja Bussid asju uurisid?
Ja kui juba kustutamist, siis siis siin on üks ümbersuunamine, mida vaja pole. Kruusamägi (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Kustutasin Busside kõik failid vale litsentsi tõttu, välja arvatud esimesena üleslaaditud faili, mille esitasin korraliseks kustutamiseks AÕ rikkumise kahtluse tõttu. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Ma tolle kasutaja puhul isegi ei välistaks, et ta oli ise kuidgi RB-ga seotud ja sai ülesandeks pildid üle panna :P
Aga natuke veel AÕ rikkumisi. Palun kustuta File:Oliver orro.jpg ja File:Anders Härm.jpg. Nende failide lubadega on kehvasti ja üleslaadija läheb teeb ise neist inimestest fotod. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
See fail on nähtavasti AÕ rikkumine. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Sama siin. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Renaming of files with invalid Estonian diacritics

edit

@Kruusamägi and Pikne: should we rename files like File:Tika karj22r.jpg. I think we should, because Wikimedia searching system is unable to find "tika karjäär"--Estopedist1 (talk) 11:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Alati võib ka kirjelduse lahtrit täiendada lihtsalt. Ma failide ümbernimetamist vajalikuks ei pea, kui need nimed just eksitavad pole. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Enne üleslaadijaga nõupidamist ei tahaks ma faili ümber nimetada. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Block Fahadharbi

edit

He offended File:Odion Ighalo (cropped).jpg on 11 April 2022 evening UTC. Flix11 (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

  Done. I blocked him/her for a week and nominated one upload for deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Taivo. Please check this file. It has been unsourced since it was uploaded and its public domain status is unreliable. Kensoup (talk) 14:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

  Done. I nominated it for regular deletion on 27th of April. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Possible change of block settings

edit

Hi. I know a while a go you blocked Brishzombie. A change in settings may be warranted based on this diff on the English Wikipedia and the global lock on their account. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pitzzaboy/Archive. Other sockpuppets of Pitzzaboy, for example Flopbean, are in Commons also tagged as sockpuppets of Mazum. Investigation does not rule out, that Pitzzaboy and Mazum are still the same person. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, can you restore this image please? It was tagged by User:Veverve (which you blocked on the grounds of "creating bad deletion requests after warnings"). The image was clearly tagged with a watermark "Copyright CC BY 4.0: Pakkin Leung" along with the source url in the file description. This was further reaffirmed by the author who said that all of his images are released under CC BY 4.0. Also pinging User:Yann since Yann accepted the speedy delete by Veverve which was wrong even at a glance. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:19, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

  Not done. The file is correctly deleted. The problem is not photographer's rights, but poster. Per {{FoP-Poland}}, art can be photographed in Poland only if it is permanently situated. This poster was held in hands. VRT-permission from poster creator is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Car images uploaded by EurovisionNim

edit

I need some car images uploaded by EurovisionNim. Please put all the images to the archive (ZIP/RAR) and upload to Dropbox/Google Drive so I can download all the images below.

After upload complete, give me the link via email. Thanks. Alex Neman (talk) 06.25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

@Alex Neman: I will temporarily restore them. Tomorrow morning I will re-delete them. Taivo (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Taivo, sorry to disturb... perhaps time to redelete? Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 20:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
@Ellywa: You are right. Normally I would not temporary undelete files at all, but these files I deleted with rationale "author's request on uploading week". Such files often have no copyright problems and I decided to grant temporary undeletion. I would not undelete copyvios. Taivo (talk) 21:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, clear now for me. Ellywa (talk) 05:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

do not delete my own artworks please.

edit

do not delete my own artworks please. I am illustrator, wikipedia editor on South Korea. I made my own artworks and upload some of them on wikimedia commons. There was an one misunderstanding in the process of translating Tupac Sharker's original English document into Korean Wikipedia. I will make my own article for wikimedia commons soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 구순돌 (talk • contribs) 07:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

I deleted 2 files, which were not your own work. I did not delete your own art. Taivo (talk) 07:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Okay. I'll be more careful when I leave a source next time. Be careful of COVID-19, and I hope your work goes well! 구순돌 (talk) 08:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

gusundol for you

edit
  gusundol for you
This award is to thank you for informing me about copyright and other matters. 구순돌 (talk) 08:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Denzel curry 2019.jpg

edit

Hi Taivo. Would you mind taking a look at File:Denzel curry 2019.jpg? It appears to be re-upload of File:Denzel Curry Red Rocks 06.05.19 (48012819743) (cropped) (cropped).jpg and it's not clear why there was a need to do that, especially since its a smaller version. The original was uploaded under a {{Cc-by-2.0}} license, but the upload is under a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license. Maybe all that needs to be done is for the license to be retweaked and a {{Modified}} or {{Extracted from}} template to be added to the re-upload's file page, but I'm not sure. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

You are right. It's unclear, why the file is needed. Still it's ineligible for speedy deletion due to mentioned reason. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
That's fine. Are the different licenses a problem? "CC-by-sa-4.0" seems to be a bit more restrictive than "CC-by-2.0", but perhaps it isn't. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
CC-BY-SA license is more restrictive than CC-BY license due to SA clause. You can change the source and license to match original file's source and license. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Taivo. Please check this file. It has been unsourced since it was uploaded and its public domain status is unreliable. Kensoup (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

  Not done. The file has source "own work". If you want, then you can nominate the file for regular (not speedy) deletion, but I do not want to do that. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Taivo. Is this file meant to be deleted as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images from Wiki Loves Africa 2022 in Côte d'Ivoire or not, or was it just an oversight? Thanks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

  Done. Thank you for pointing out my mistake! Taivo (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Its been more than 2 months since I started the deletion request for this file [File:Cultural Dress of Gilgit Baltistan.jpg] which I created. Why the file is not being deleted? I'm the original uploader of the file. Do I not have rights of the file? I already posted the reason of deletion and still the file is there. I request again that the file be deleted. --Kskhh (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Infrogmation answered to you in the deletion request. You have some rights, but not a right to demand deletion of the file. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Is a suspected sockpuppet of C ? See vi:Đặc biệt:Đóng góp/2405:4802::/38. Lp186 (talk) 12:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This is not a problem here, because user:C is not registered in Commons. You can ask from local checkusers in vi.wiki. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Kustutamist

edit

Kiirkorras võiks kustutada selle. Seda kasutati ühes vandalismiartiklis. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Consolidation of categories

edit

Hi! Please merge histories of Category:Riy (surname) and Category:Rii (surname). Thanks. --Бучач-Львів (talk) 14:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

  Done? Taivo (talk) 14:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Much thanks

edit

Thank you for unblock me here. Snake bgd (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Years of completion

edit

Hi Taivo, I have one useful information regarding your edits like this: there's no need that you spend precious time for inserting years of construction inside photos, because there's one unique "rule" with Iranian architecture here. If there's a particular category of building or structure (like Sepehr Tower), there's always a category with year of completion, or decade, or century, and that chronological data is supported by references under "inauguration date" property inside Wikidata. Refs are always links with reliable sources, not dubious dates imported from Wikipedias. Thousands of buildings follow that rule, as you can see on lists of 502 years & 115 decades. If there's accidentally a building without proper category & infobox ref, it means I didn't pass it yet, and that I'll do it soon. :) It's also useful to know this information because in recent months some statues (like this) were nominated to deletion, despite being properly sourced in infobox. --Orijentolog (talk) 10:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Good afternoon Taivo, I would like to inform you that Miss Mattërn (A3cb1) has been reincarnated in Serkerßrando few time ago, and he/she is reuploading some of the files that were deleted from Miss Mattërn and also uploading a lot of another paintings, drawings and photographs of European nobility, Catholic Church, and another themes. Also, I cite here my message sent to DMacks, who blocked three similar-activity accounts few time ago: Marasmieli, Antitumint4 and Kurnughy77 (the last one uploaded a serie of files of Pope Pius XII which I nominated for deletion and that I can see that you deleted the three remains, and for that thank you so much). The three accounts that I tell you are related between themselves specifically by the style of pronunciate "unknown author" for works with no kwown author: they had used "Unknow Person". With this phrase style to explain that a work is unknown I was able to investigate related accounts and I'd found Miss Mattërn. For that, after see that Miss Mattërn was also a sock, I suspect that the three related accounts blocked by DMacks are possible other socks of A3cb1 (master account of Miss Mattërn). With this, as you are also the admin who blocked Miss Mattërn, could you please block Serkerßrando too and confirm that Marasmieli, Antitumint4 and Kurnughy77 are also sockpuppets of A3cb1 please? Thank you for your help, sincerely.

83.61.237.190 01:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

  Comment, here is one of the files uploaded by Serkerßrando, in which this account uses the "unknow person" of Marasmieli, Antitumint4 and Kurnughy77. 83.61.237.190 21:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Krd blocked Serkerßrando indefinitely and also Serkerßrando is globally locked due to abusing multiple accounts, but Krd did not agree, that (s)he is sockpuppet of A3cb1 Taivo (talk) 14:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Combining

edit

Hi! Please combine the stories of these two categories: Category:Hryhoriy (given name) and Category:Hryhorii (given name). Unfortunately, there can't be 2 options on Wikidata. Thanks. --Бучач-Львів (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

  Done. Taivo (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Please combine the stories of these two categories: Category:Klymentii Sarnytskyi and Category:Klyment Sarnytskyi. Thanks. --Бучач-Львів (talk) 07:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

  Done. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Please combine the stories of these two categories: Category:Valeriy Zaluzhny and Category:Valerii Zaluzhnyi. Thanks. --Бучач-Львів (talk) 09:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

  Not done. Here is no history to merge. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

About delete requests to me

edit

About the delete request,I don't think this request is appropriate. The reason is that logos such as file:Shutoko logo.svg or other Irodos (talk · contribs)'s works has not been removed. Ramsal18 (talk) 22:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

I do not understand, which request you are talking about. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Taivo. Can you please check this file? This is a film screenshot from a 1942 copyrighted film, the classic "Casablanca." The film was produced and distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures, which owns the copyright to the film, and it does not belong to a trailer screenshot, so it's has been falsely credited as being on the public domain. Kedorra (talk) 06:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

  Not done. I cannot confirm neither that you are right nor that you are wrong. You can nominate the file for regular (not speedy) deletion. In the request please show evidence, that the film is still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Fortepan

edit

Why https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:(Voronyezsi_ter%C3%BClet,_hoholszkiji_j%C3%A1r%C3%A1s),_a_felv%C3%A9tel_a_telep%C3%BCl%C3%A9s_d%C3%A9li_hat%C3%A1r%C3%A1n%C3%A1l_k%C3%A9sz%C3%BClt._Fortepan_27219.jpg was kept? As I understand, Fortepan has amazing library of various interesting images but sadly they have no problems with lying (or they are very confused about licensing).

Is the approach to delete files only in case of confirmed/blatant lies?

I really like WC because using files is relatively safe due to treating copyright (including its idiotic parts) seriously, so I am confused why this images were not deleted given that Fortepan slaps CC on everything no matter whether they have rights or not. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Zello said, that the photos were donated by the heir of the photographer, painter Tamás Konok Jr. That case we have permission form photographer('s heir). Taivo (talk) 12:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
But can we trust this Fortepan claim given that they lie about other copyright-related claims? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 12:32, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Sometimes, sometimes not. Fortepan-related deletion requests are always difficult. Taivo (talk) 13:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
They are not lying about sources, that accusation is unsubstantiated. They used wrong licences in some cases which I think happens quite often with our users too, and in fact with everybody who is not a copyright expert. And I'm fairly sure that painter Tamás Konok was not lying on his own blog about the photographs of his father. Your approach to nominate for deletion every Fortepan image has huge implications for Commons, and goes against a previous policy where only confirmed mistakes were deleted like the Magyar Rendőr photographs. Recently you nominated a bunch of really old pictures for deletion where the donor was named as Fortepan. It was previously agreed that Fortepan as donor is not enough information (as it means the photograph has no specified donors) but the images are all qualify for PD-Hu-unkown due to their age (pre-1943) and the fact that they are works of unknown photographers. Zello (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Võimalik AÕ rikkumine

edit

See fail on suht kahtlane. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

VRT Permission received for photo you've deleted

edit

Hello,

I'm looking through Ticket:2022062010003871 now, and it appears to have valid permission for the now-deleted file previously available at file:NickyLu 2.jpg. I'm seeing that the file was deleted as a copyright violation, though we received valid permission one day before the photo was deleted as a copyright violation. Would it be possible to restore the photo to commons?

Yours sincerely,
Mhawk10 (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

  Done. AntiCompositeNumber already restored the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)