User talk:Ввласенко/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass windows in the Alcázar of Segovia - (Stained glass "Don Enriq" in the Alcázar).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Argyroneta aquatica (Diving bell spider) with prey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image; The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 3 March 2020 (UTC) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Sorry -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Question What's going on in the image, please. Who's eating who? 09:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  • The spider eats the fish that he caught.--Ввласенко (talk) 10:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
    •  Support It's a perfect image. We add with prey to the scope for further labilistion of this animal which is well worth it. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
      • Thank you! -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

QIC promoted:

• Ladiko_beach._Rhodes,_Greece.jpg

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carros de cesto do Monte with carreiros.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Maria Prymachenko. Eared beast grasped a Crustacean. 1983.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ушатка вхопила рака, та рак не дурак, як укусить буде знак (Eared beast grasped a crustacean ) - Maria Pryjmachenko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Your scope announces a self-portrait of the artist. This is not entirely the case. For a table we give: the title of the table (The title of the atbleaus are normative) they are sometimes of very long title but it is necessary to respect the choice of the artist, the name of the author and if possible the place where the work is exhibited. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done Thank you for your help. Is it done right? -- Ввласенко (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now; See the scope changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Thank you! -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - Very small edit to the scope - I think we use sentence capitalization rather than title capitalization for English-language titles on Commons, but correct me if I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bridge of San Martín, Toledo (View from the north-west).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bank of the Dnieper River in the Obolon area (Obolonskyi District).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I propose to place this scope {{C|Obolon|Bank of the Dnieper River in the Obolon area}} which is more targeted and which will allow you to place in competition other images of Obolon.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Very well! I follow your advice. -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:19, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but I could not create category Bank of the Dnieper River in the Obolon area -- Ввласенко (talk) 14:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vltava-Labe confluence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Maria Prymachenko. Ukrainian bull. 1977.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Український бик (Ukrainian bull) - Maria Pryjmachenko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Photographers in art (ArT of opEN doors - Rua de Santa Maria).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yevhen Paton Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volunteer guarding the Maidan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Is the force this man is a member of named Self-Defense of the Maidan? If so, that's a proper name and needs to be capitalized. Otherwise, the scope should include the name of the force, whatever it is. The scope should also reflect the fact that we're looking at an individual. So for example, if he is a member of a police force, the scope should be something like "Member of Such-and-Such Police Force at the Maidan". Let's discuss this and find the best phrasing for the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  • At the time of the photo shooting, the Maidan security was voluntarily. "Self-defense of the Maidan" was created later. Volunteers provided for themselves, and looked diverse - below I put a photo of man in the Papakha, taken at the same time and the same plase. The best wording for both images is "Volunteer guarding the Maidan".-- Ввласенко (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

• That scope would be good for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Done -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas Orthodox church in Dobruš of the Dekanat dobruski.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope useful & used. Buidhe (talk) 09:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Yes indeed, but you forgot to change the status to "supported". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iput River.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope (although File:Тихие воды.jpg is also quite good). Buidhe (talk) 15:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorials in Vyshhorod Raion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment This is not the only World War II memorial in the category, so I would suggest modifying the scope to include only this one. Surely this one memorial doesn't accurately portray all of them, especially since they all look different. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment In my opinion, the scope for memorials should be separated from the scope for mass graves of the times of WWII. We can use existing "Category:Mass graves of Soviet soldiers". I used this category as scope for the photo below. -- Ввласенко (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Yasnogorodka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• I would support as BIS as it shows the entire memorial. But this isn't a picture of the mass grave; it's a picture of the memorial. Scope should be changed accordingly. Buidhe (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Info The photo shows exactly the mass grave, the burial place of soldiers who died in battle, and not the cenotaph. The rectangular elevation between the monument above grave and the slab with the names is typical for the designation of burials. A monument above the grave and a list of buried soldiers were erected several years after the end of WWII. All photos of this scope shows above grave monuments installed directly at the burial site, the characteristic of rectangular grave elevations are visible in all photos. A memorial (not a mass grave) is shown in the photo with "Scope: World War II memorials in Homieĺ Region, memorial in Dobrush", which is presented below. -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

* Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorials in Homieĺ Region, memorial in Dobrush.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old part of town Dobruš, Belarus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protester Piano Extremist plays on the roof of a burned-out Berkut bus, the barricade across Hrushevskoho str., Kiev, 10 February 2014.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I made a slight correction, but are you saying the burned-out Berkut bus constituted the barricade? Please clarify for me and anyone else who's generally aware of the Euromaidan protests but unaware of these kinds of specifics. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
• Answer - Thank you for correction. Berkut blocked the Grushevsky st., using two buses. In the clashes with Protestants, buses were burned-out, and its skeletons, which blocked the street, were used to create a barricade. The barricade many times passed from hand to hand, and in one of the calm periods a piano was seted on the top of it. At the time of photo shot, Piano Extremist Bogdan played Chopin. -- Ввласенко (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

• I understand. And these were protestors. I assume most were not Protestants, though I know there are some Evangelicals in Ukraine. I will make other slight alterations to the scope. I'm  Supporting this nomination as useful historical documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
• Thank you. The word "protestants" appeared instead of "protesters" because of my mistake, religion does not appear in this case. -- Ввласенко (talk) 06:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

• Hold it: I mistook the "Info" in "reason" for the scope. The scope was way too broad. Would you accept this as the scope? Otherwise, I would have to oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

• Yes I agree. -- Ввласенко (talk) 05:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giorgio in Braida (Verona) - Remote views, view from the left bank of the Adige river.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Remote views does not make much sense it would be more judicious to add either the exposure (here - east exposure) or Campanile. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Done I changed the scope -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - The scope is fine, but aren't all the other images in scope in Category:San Giorgio in Braida (Verona) - Remote views, rather than the category you linked? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment You think that both categories should be indicated in the scope, is not it? -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support The problem is corrected: An image cannot be overcategorized. She cannot be in a mother category and in a daughter category. Now everything seems perfect to me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Rognosa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope I'm curious—is this an aerial photograph or was it taken from a nearby building? Buidhe (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
• It's view from Torre Grossa -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Retrone River in Vicenza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, in my opinion. Changed capitalization - the whole proper name is Retrone River. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
• Thank you -- Ввласенко (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

• Sure thing! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan at the Trafalgar Square.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan in the Open Garden Squares Weekend at the Trafalgar Square June 6, 2019  Support best in scope. --MB-one (talk) 11:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:04, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Andrés Laguna, Segovia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:20, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The procession of the Noble Contrada Oca (Palio di Siena).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Really useful, and thanks for nominating this photo. I spent 2 summers and part of another in Siena and have been to 2 Palios. I also can hear the drumbeats and chants by the contrade for a couple of weeks before the Palio in my mind's ear now as I write this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
• I agree with you, photos often contain more than only image. -- Ввласенко (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 03:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piazza Trento e Trieste (Ferrara).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 12:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rehearsal for the Corteo Storico parade before the Palio in the Castellare degli Ugurgieri - Contrada Civetta headquarters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I don't think this is a rehearsal of the Palio, as the Palio itself is the horse race. This would be either a procession or a rehearsal for a procession, non è vero? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
• Answer - You are right, of course it's a rehearsal of a procession for the parade Corteo Storico which passes before the start of the Palio. I fixed the scope, spero sia meglio adesso? -- Ввласенко (talk) 11:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Penso di si. I tweaked the scope slightly. Thank you for the nomination! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 10:42, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Apollinare Nuovo (Ravenna) - Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of Galla Placidia (Ravenna) - Mosaic of the Martyrdom of St. Lawrence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 13:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vesuvius from the Necropolis of Porta Nocera.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Porta Nocera is the gate itself, so the best image in scope would be a closeup of the gate. I think you mean to nominate this in a different scope, don't you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Done - O'k, I have nominate it in a different scope. -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:05, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
• I fixed the scope I think this is the only photo in this scope; can you confirm that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
• Thank you, I agree with your proposal, and I see three more photos that correspond to your proposed scope. -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

• Eh? This is your scope. I just fixed the formatting. Are the other photos in scope all in the linked gallery? We need to compare all the photos in scope to determine which is best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:52, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
• There are four photos in Category:Vesuvius from the Necropolis of Porta Nocera. -- Ввласенко (talk) 16:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Thanks. Your photo is higher-quality than File:Pompeji vesuv.jpg, but Vesuvius will be more visible in that one at review size. However, Vesuvius is partly blocked by foliage in that shot, and yours shows more of the shape of the volcano, if people can actually see it. I'm not sure this scope is optimal for your photo, but I'll consider it best in scope. However, before I can support it, please de-orphan your new gallery. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
• Orphan is adopted, sorry. -- Ввласенко (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

• Great.  Support per my remarks above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 12:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Byzantine mosaics in Sant'Apollinare Nuovo (Ravenna) - Justinian I.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Estimated image of Theodoric the Great, but not Justinian I

•  Support The image is used, useful and best in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 22:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Question How do you compare to this? --pandakekok9 13:16, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I think this one is better than the one you mentioned, pandakekok99. I was going to close this nomination, but I think I'll  Support and leave it open for a few more days. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. pandakekok9 03:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Changing VI scope

When changing the scope after some reviewers had casted their votes, please use {{VIC-scope-change}} and notify the voters by ping or their talk pages. Thanks, pandakekok9 08:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

• O'k, thank you. -- Ввласенко (talk) 13:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Photographs of flags of Ukraine during Euromaidan in Kiev - A moment of silence in memory of Heavenly Hundred.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Khreshchatyk St., in the background - burned down Trade Unions Building

•  Comment - I changed the scope. -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:42, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The top crop is a tad tight but I'm not obsessed by tiny details for a VI. In terms of showing the flag, it's complete, adequately lit and shows context well. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umbrella streets in Ferrara, Via Giuseppe Mazzini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jo (ship, 2004) in Syracuse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support the one and only. --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Best in scope. --pandakekok9 06:04, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 04:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

• Благодарю за доверие! -- Ввласенко (talk) 06:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baroncelli Chapel - Stained-glass windows by Taddeo Gaddi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I changed the scope to "by Taddeo Gaddi", because they're by him, rather than being portraits showing his likeness. Useful and a beautiful photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

• Sorry for my english, thank you. -- Ввласенко (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

• No worries! Your English is much better than my nonexistent Ukrainian! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Platform of Malostranská metro station in Prague.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I fixed (in my opinion) your scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:51, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• O'k, thank you! -- Ввласенко (talk) 14:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• Looking more closely, I think you need to specify "platform", and if there's more than one platform, which platform this is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
• There are two platforms for two directions. They are identical. -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

• OK, then just specify "platform". There are pictures of other parts of this station. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Done -- Ввласенко (talk) 13:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - I honestly don't know which photo is best in scope. It looks to me like you could make an argument for 4-5 photos. So I'll just say this is useful, and I'd welcome for others to express an opinion about whether this or another photo is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose This photo is not geocoded. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:58, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Sorry, forgot. -- Ввласенко (talk) 06:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The image is overcategorized. The scope should be linked to the appropriate subcategory and the category that is used here removed. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Did I understand you correctly: for scope must be used Malostranská (metro station), and Platform of Malostranská metro station must be deleted? -- Ввласенко (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment No, I think he meant that the scope should link to the Platform of Malostranská metro station instead of the more generic category for the whole station. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment You'd better use the subcategory "Platform of Malostranská metro station", it's more to the point. The "upper" category "Malostranská (metro station)" then is redundant, hence for your image not necessary anymore. But, on the other hand, IMO it is not a big problem, for me no reason to oppose. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• Answer In my opinion, everything is correct. The upper category is “Metro. Line A”, below the “Malostranska station”, even lower subcategories that are parts of the station: “Tram stop”, “Garden courtyard”, “Statue in the lobby”, “Escalators”, “Platform”. What would you like to fix in this sequence? -- Ввласенко (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

The correct scope would be Platform of Malostranská metro station in Prague. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Done -- Ввласенко (talk) 20:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

 Support Very fine! --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained-glass windows in the Pazzi Chapel, Stained glass of St. Andrew designed by Alesso Baldovinetti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I agree that this photo is best in scope, but please add geocoordinates. Also, some of the other photos in scope specify the artist as Alesso Baldovinetti, so why don't you do that, too? There's an article about him in Ukrainian Wikipedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done Thank you -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - BIS, as I mentioned, but I'd still like you to add the name of the artist to the file description, although it's good to also include his name in the scope, so thanks for that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

• I add the name of the artist to the file description. -- Ввласенко (talk) 11:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Vitale (Ravenna) - Mosaics of Martyr Gervasius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I consider this best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lungomare di Levante Elio Vittorini, Ortigia, Syracuse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support This seems to be best in scope to me. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dawn in Naples harbor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful, as this is considered one of the greatest views in Italy (the saying is that when you've seen Naples from the sea, you can die, with the implication that it can't get any better than that), and it's much more common to see it at sunset than at sunrise. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old olive near Temple of Hera (Agrigento).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Charterhouse of Granada, view from the east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

So far  Best in Scope until another one comes up with better lighting. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

• I was looking for a shooting point for a long time, this is the city (poles, wires, trees), and the sun has gone. Hope someone does better.-- Ввласенко (talk) 18:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

• Why not you some day? --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
• Because I'm more realistic than optimistic. -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial Irma Maria de sao Francisco Wilson in Santa Cruz, Madeira..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christopher Columbus by Henrique Moreira (bronze, 1940) in Funchal, Madeira.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:16, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Airport cafeterias - Helsinki Marken, Vantaa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 11:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Perhaps the name of this specific airport cafeteria should be added to the scope? —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would prefer the restaurant name in the scope. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kestreltail. I'll bet this is not the only eatery of this type in that airport. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: @Kestreltail: @Spurzem: - I added the cafeteria name to the scope. -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

I would like it if the scope specialists changed the wording themselves instead of torturing us with their criticism and their incomprehensible instructions. It is enough for me if it is a good and rare picture with a suitable description. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

You could change the scope, too. Your aversion to having discussions of scope on VIC, which is all about deciding which scopes are useful and which photos are useful to illustrate a scope, is bizarre. Meanwhile, I'm fine with this.  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lindt Island Chocolate shop in Zurich Airport.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Is there only one chocolate shop in that airport? Is there indeed only one Lindt shop in that airport? (I don't know; I'm just asking.) If there is, maybe that could merit a scope, though I'm not sure and would defer to others on whether there's anything visually distinctive enough or otherwise notable about it to distinguish it from other Lindt shops. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good image, useful and used, best in scope -- Spurzem (talk) 20:28, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

• Preliminary  Oppose until my questions are answered. This may be a useful scope, but I'd like that to be established before it is promoted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
• Answer - I don't know how many shops there are at the airport.-- Ввласенко (talk) 11:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I have been in this shop, but not sicne the renovation; it is not the only chocolate shop in the airport. The scope needs to be more specific. I imagine this is the Lindt Chocolate Boutique jointly operated by Lindt & Sprüngli Travel Retail and Dufry Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Info -  Done - Scope changed from Chocolate shops in Switzerland to Lindt Chocolate shop in Zurich Airport.-- Ввласенко (talk) 07:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: @Spurzem: @Charlesjsharp: -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Question - Is it indeed the only Lindt shop in that airport? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:24, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

• I think so. 09:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
• Someone forgot to put a signature? -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - There seem to be two Lindt shops in the airport, so please specify which one this is a picture of. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: I would like to have your worries too! ;-) Nevertheless: It is almost certainly to be assumed that there will be the same Lindt shop at this airport a second time. Perhaps any other but not the same. -- Spurzem (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

If you want my worries, get on a flight to New York now and sit in your hotel for a week or two without walking outside, while listening to the ambulances go by and the neighbor in the next building having horrible lung coughs every morning. Having gotten that off my chest: I'm not sure I completely understand the substance of your remarks. Are you saying all Lindt shops look exactly the same as one another? If so, that would be important to know. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: This is Lindt Island shop. It’s not difficult for me to change the scope. You want each store to have its own scope, but you are opposed to each aircarrier having its own scope. What is the difference? I do not understand the principle of assigning the scopes. -- Ввласенко (talk) 14:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Ввласенко: Because each shop may be distinguishable, whereas a plane looks the same no matter which airport it is at. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Exactly. From the pictures on the airport's site, I can easily see that the two shops look different. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Kestreltail: @Ikan Kekek: @Spurzem: @Charlesjsharp:

Thank you for your clarification. Since each scope must be detailed, I change “Category: Lindt Chocolate shop in Zurich Airport” to “Category: Lindt Island Chocolate shop in Zurich Airport”. It seems to me that a discussion of the scope about airplanes would be more appropriate in “Nominated by Ввласенко 2020-04-23 06:46 (UTC) Scope: Ukraine International aircraft at Rhodes International Airport”(above on the page), where I made the comment. I would be grateful if you want take a look at it. -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support in this scope. I kind of do think this is a useful scope - a shop by a Swiss chocolate manufacturer in a Swiss airport. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arian Baptistery (Ravenna) - Mosaic of Saint Paul.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - If this is the only picture in scope, it's certainly useful, but why is the parent category for this subcategory "Mosaics of Saint Paul" instead of "Arian Baptistery (Ravenna)" or some subcategory thereof? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• Of course, "Category: Arian Baptistery (Ravenna) - Mosaic of Saint Paul" can be made a subcategory of "Category: Arian Baptistry (Ravenna) - Details of vault mosaics". But why "Category: Arian Baptistry (Ravenna) - Details of vault mosaics" is better than "Category:Mosaics of Saint Paul"? -- Ввласенко (talk) 14:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• My point is that this category is fine but that it should be a subcategory of a category of mosaics at Arian Baptistry. "Category: Arian Baptistry (Ravenna) - Details of vault mosaics" is a fine parent category for this. Mosaics of Saint Paul can be anywhere around the world. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Again criticism of the scope! Is there really only one who knows how it is right? I see a good picture, used and useful. And obviously we have no other good or better image of this mosaic. Therefore my „supported“. -- Spurzem (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - I have no problem with the scope. Again, I think you may be having trouble understanding what I've written. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Milan. Passengers at Malpensa Airport.jpg

File:Milan. Passengers at Malpensa Airport.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Milan. Passengers at Malpensa Airport.jpg A.Savin 18:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Croce (Florence) - from Giotto's Bell Tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• I'm a little torn here, because the church is bigger at review size in File:View from Giotto IMG 4601.JPG, but that photo is undersaturated, needs its tilt corrected, and the tower behind the church is in a more distracting place on the photo, so overall, I'm saying this is  Best in Scope, although I'd welcome an argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: Look at the size of the images you are comparing (5.2 Mb vs 19 Mb), please, and you'll see where of the Basilica is bigger. -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Ввласенко, the VIC guidelines aren't about the absolute sizes of photos but how they look at review size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: Could you clarify, please, whether I understood right, what according to VIC guidelines image File:Basilica of Santa Croce from Giotto's Bell Tower 1.jpg is preferable? -- Ввласенко (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Yes, in fact that would be better in scope. I'll cross out my supporting vote here. Please nominate that photo, and thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: - Well, I'll put it as a new version of this file. -- Ввласенко (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• Ввласенко, I hope you're not overwriting this file, which is nice and has its own usefulness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
• Ikan Kekek - Both options are saved under one name. -- Ввласенко (talk) 17:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• I'd really rather you saved both separately, but regardless, this photo is  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View Bologna from the top of the Basilica di San Petronio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - I haven't been to Bologna. Which other photos are in this scope? Thanks, Ввласенко. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: - Sorry, but I did not understand your question. What photos do you mean, other than those in the Category:Panoramics in Bologna? -- Ввласенко (talk) 08:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

• The specific scope is "View from the top of the Basilica di San Petronio". In fact, that should probably be the only scope, linked from the category. Which photos are in that scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: - I made a new category and collected views from the Basilica di San Petronio. -- Ввласенко (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - Clearly best in scope, as I thought. I wasn't insisting that you create a new subcategory, but it's probably a good idea. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Agostino (Bergamo) - Cloister.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Buidhe (talk) 01:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

QIC promoted:

• Alcázar_and_its_reflection_in_the_Tagus._Toledo,_Spain.jpg

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

QIC promoted:

• Royal_Palace_in_Aranjuez_Spane.jpg

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

QIC promoted:

• View_of_Malaga_from_Castillo_Gibralfaro._Spain.jpg

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)