Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Anselmikus!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Tennis Barnstar
Your work with tennis images is appreciated. The Andrea Hlaváčková categorization was on my to-do list, but you beat me to it...   INeverCry 23:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your appreciation. I started editing on commons quite recently and it makes me happy to see that my work is acknowledged and goes in the right direction. --Anselmikus (talk) 22:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
It's nice to see some fellow tennis fans at work here. It's also nice to see that you and I, and a few other people have picked off some of the unidentified players in this cat, which looks to be about half done. INeverCry 22:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scopeEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Category:2012 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Kacir (talk) 03:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Anselmikus".