Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pjposullivan!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Cardofk!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Jezuieten Heverlee.jpg edit

 
File:Jezuieten Heverlee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blurred Lines (talk) 16:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

"Diocese of Lancaster" and "Lancashire" edit

There are parts of the Diocese of Lancaster that are not in Lancashire. There are parts of Lancashire that are not in the Diocese of Lancaster. So your recent change to the categories isn't correct. Can you please undo what you did? -- Dr Greg  talk  22:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dr Greg. Funnily enough I was just looking that up now. I think i also made the same mistake with a few other dioceses. Sure, no worries, will undo it. Pjposullivan (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! -- Dr Greg  talk  19:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


 
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:St Cuthbert's Church lady chapel window, Durham by Lawrence OP.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA),   (CC0) and   (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

   FDMS  4    17:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


 
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:St Cuthbert's Church Venerable Bede window, Durham by Lawrence OP.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA),   (CC0) and   (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

   FDMS  4    17:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you FDMS4, the owner of the photos has now changed the license for both photos:

Are they now on the right license?

Thanks for the input, Pjposullivan (talk) 21:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, great, pinging User:McZusatz who enforced the deletion.    FDMS  4    21:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Pjposullivan: File:St Cuthbert's Church Venerable Bede window, Durham by Lawrence OP.jpg is still NC-ND at the source according to flickr. --McZusatz (talk) 21:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
@FDMS4: Ever thought about RfA? ;) --McZusatz (talk) 21:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
@McZusatz: Yes, thanks, but I'm unfortunately rather busy at the moment :).    FDMS  4    21:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi McZusatz, I messaged the owner of the photos last night and I think that the Venerable Bede window (https://www.flickr.com/photos/paullew/14078019597/) has been switched to the same license as the Lady Chapel window. Thanks again for helping me with this, Pjposullivan (talk) 12:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deleted content edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Cardofk, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Immaculate Conception Church, Massey.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Hedwig in Washington, thank you, I was the one who put those pictures up for deletion. By doing so, I was trying to undo my past mistakes. Thank you for deleting them. Pjposullivan (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
No problem, no worries.   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I have just found six more and have promptly put them up for deletion. Pjposullivan (talk) 17:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Names of the Scottish dioceses edit

Hi, j'espère que tu comprend le français, qui est la seule langue étrangère que je connais. Tu a fais autrefois cette carte (Scottish Catholic Dioceses), mais sans y mettre les noms des (archi)diocèses. Tu pourrais aussi ajouter les noms dans le même style que celui utilisé dans cette carte (English and Welsh Catholic Dioceses Map)? Thank you.--Croberto68 (talk) 14:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour Croberto68, merci, je voudrais aussi utiliser le même style que les cartes de l'Angleterre et du Pays de Galles. Je n'ai pas le temps maintenant, mais j'aimerais le faire dans un avenir proche. Si vous voulez essayer, n'hésitez pas. Happy editing! Pjposullivan (talk) 12:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ciao. Je ne suis pas capable de travailler les photos... et je ne voudrais pas faire des betises. On peut attendre quant tu aura du temps.--Croberto68 (talk) 12:51, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Smaller Royal Holloway logo.jpg edit

No blame, but I don't seem how it doesn't qualify for COM:CSD F2/F3. I won't tag the other file with anything so we can discuss (on the deletion request page you created) this first without causing more issues Shadowssettle (talk) 18:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Catholic Dioceses in Greece.png edit

Hi! This map is not correct: Epirus is part of the Archdiocese of Corfu, Zakynthos, and Cephalonia, not of the Apostolic Vicariate of Thessaloniki. Is it possible to change it? Thanks! Jerus82 (talk) 08:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Jerus82. Yes, it is absolutely possible to change it, just upload a new corrected version. Thanks, Cardofk (talk) 09:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm not be able to do it, I ask you if you can. Thanks! --Jerus82 (talk) 13:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Nonsense Jerus82, the whole point of Wikipedia is that anyone can edit it. Cardofk (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply