User talk:Chabe01/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Entrée Station Métro Pyramides Paris 1.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Entrée Station Métro Pyramides Paris 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Entrée Station Métro Marcadet Poissonniers Paris 7.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Entrée Station Métro Marcadet Poissonniers Paris 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Entrée Station Métro Marcadet Poissonniers Paris 6.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Entrée Station Métro Marcadet Poissonniers Paris 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Entrée Station Métro Jules Joffrin Paris 2.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Entrée Station Métro Jules Joffrin Paris 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Entrée Station Métro Jules Joffrin Paris 1.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Entrée Station Métro Jules Joffrin Paris 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Entrée Station Métro Marcadet Poissonniers Paris 5.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Entrée Station Métro Marcadet Poissonniers Paris 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Station Vélib' Jean Moulin Paul Doumer Montreuil Seine St Denis 3.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Station Vélib' Jean Moulin Paul Doumer Montreuil Seine St Denis 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Entrée Station Métro Fourche Paris 1.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Entrée Station Métro Fourche Paris 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Entrée Station Métro Guy Môquet Paris 3.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Entrée Station Métro Guy Môquet Paris 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Square Roger Beaudoin Fontenay Bois 10.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Square Roger Beaudoin Fontenay Bois 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Grièges - Routes.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Grièges - Routes.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Crottet - Routes.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Crottet - Routes.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:St Jean Veyle - Routes.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:St Jean Veyle - Routes.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bâgé Ville Carte.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bâgé Ville Carte.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Carte Feillens.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carte Feillens.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Routes Feillens.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Routes Feillens.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Carte Replonges.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carte Replonges.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Crottet - Carte.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Crottet - Carte.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:St Jean Priche - Carte.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:St Jean Priche - Carte.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Loché - Routes.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Loché - Routes.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Carte Loché.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carte Loché.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Plan Bourg Bresse Forêt.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plan Bourg Bresse Forêt.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Tramway Lyon 1-plan.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, tu es l'auteur de ce diagramme. Pourrais-tu le mettre à jour avec une correspondance avec le T6 à Debourg en plus ? Bonne continuation et merci d'avance ! Nonopoly (talk) 14:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Salut, merci de l'information. J'ai mis à jour le diagramme ;) Chabe01 (talk) 16:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Bibliothèque Grièges 2.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bibliothèque Grièges 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Bibliothèque Grièges 4.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bibliothèque Grièges 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Panneau logo Bey 1.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Panneau logo Bey 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 12:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Panneau fibre Cruzilles Mépillat 2.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Panneau fibre Cruzilles Mépillat 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Panneau fibre Cruzilles Mépillat 1.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Panneau fibre Cruzilles Mépillat 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Panneau fibre Cruzilles Mépillat 3.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Panneau fibre Cruzilles Mépillat 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Terrain baseball Cruzilles Mépillat 1.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Terrain baseball Cruzilles Mépillat 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Station Tramway Ligne 4 Rougemont Chanteloup Sevran 5.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Station Tramway Ligne 4 Rougemont Chanteloup Sevran 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Chabe01. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Plan Paris Tramway ligne 4 2019.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour Chabe01, Bravo pour votre plan du T4. Je note cependant 2 erreurs à corriger : "Maurice Rodin" au lieu de "Maurice Audin" et "Mairie de Clichy-sous-Bois" au lieu de "Clichy-sous-Bois - Mairie". Bonne continuation. Eole99 (talk) 06:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour, merci du retour. J'ai corrigé les erreurs pour le plan Plan Paris Tramway ligne 4 2019.svg ainsi que pour Plan Paris Tramway ligne 4 2020.svg et Plan Paris Tramway ligne 4 2022.svg Chabe01 (talk) 12:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Plan des Transilien

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonsoir, je voulais quand pourras-tu faire les plans des lignes des transilien (H,J,K,L,N,P, R et U) d'Île de France qui seront similaires à ceux des liens (de la SNCF) sur les pages wikipédia qui ont besoin d'une remise en touche.

Merci d'avance.

AlexBurn44 (talk) 20:45, 04 January 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour, je fais ça dès que je peux. Chabe01 (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Arrêts de bus de Fontenay

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour ! J'ai vu que tu prenais en photo pas mal d'arrêts de bus, si tu veux j'ai fait un tableau de board des arrêts de bus RATP sur wikidata:User:Léna/RATP pour suivre lesquels ont notamment des photos :) Léna (talk) 08:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour, merci de l'information et le tableau est super pour suivre l'avancement des photos, bien que certaines des photos d'arrêts de bus que j'ai prises ont été supprimées. Chabe01 (talk) 14:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Bravo !

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Chabe01 et bravo pour tout ton travail sur Commons ! Bretwa (talk) 20:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument morts Cimetière ancien Charenton Pont Paris 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Plan T6 et T8

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour !

Tout d'abord bravo et merci pour tout le travail accompli sur les différents plans de lignes ! Cependant j'ai remarqué que les plans des lignes de tramway 6 et 8 (Plan T6 et Plan T8) ne sont pas "dans le bon sens" : l'est à gauche et l'ouest à droite, ce qui est l'inverse des plans de la RATP : T6 et T8.

Quand tu en auras le temps, pourras-tu t'occuper d'inverser le sens de ces plans ?

Merci d'avance ! Maxdemadrid (talk) 15:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau direction Maisons Alfort Centre Rue Pierre Semard Maisons Alfort 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 18:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Corbeil-Essonnes: Culture vs sports vs events.

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour Chabe01

Nous en avions déjà parlé, et je vous ai déjà donné mon point de vue. Pour moi, il n'est pas concevable d'inclure les catégories "Sports" et "Events" dans la catégorie "Culture". Je vous ai déjà présenté plusieurs fois mes arguments :

tous les événements qui ont lieu dans une ville ne sont pas tous des évènements culturels
toutes les activités sportives ne sont pas toutes des activités culturelles

Je vous prierai d'arrêter ces sous-catégorisations qui n'ont aucun sens logique. Vous pouvez éventuellement procéder à des catégorisations transversales mais pas hiérarchiques. --Poudou99 (talk) 23:38, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Bonsoir,

Je ne fais que suivre la catégorisation qui est faite au plus haut niveau, comme l'indique ce lien : Events, qui fait partie de la sous-catégorie de culture. Chabe01 (talk) 23:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Nous en avons déjà parlé, c'est du cas par cas et il n'y a pas de règles générales.

Vous intervenez dans des catégories dans lesquelles vous n'avez pas franchement contribué, je vous prierai de laisser les choix faits précédemment à partir du moment où ils obéissent aux règles de hiérarchie des catégories dans Commons.

Je vous le répète, il existe des manière de faire des catégories transversalles avec des alias. ( " ", "#", "*", "!",...). Mais de grâce, respecter le travail des personnes qui ont contribué précédemment. --Poudou99 (talk) 23:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Je viens de réaliser 2 catégorisations transversales pour "Sports in Corbeil-Essonnes" et "Events in Corbeil-Essonnes" qui demeurent des catégories filles directes de "Corbeil-Essonnes" mais aussi des catégories transverses pour "Culture of Corbeil-Essonnes" avec l'alias "*".

C'est ainsi que l'on procède pour indiquer que des catégories sont autonomes et indépendantes mais dont une partie des éléments font aussi partie d'une autre catégorie de même niveau (c'est qui est le cas des catégories "Culture" / "Events" / "Sports" . --Poudou99 (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Monument Déportés Château Thierry 1.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Monument Déportés Château Thierry 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

86.249.245.173 14:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Monument Déportés Château Thierry 2.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Statue De Gaulle Grand Palais Paris 1.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Gare Mâcon Loché TGV Mâcon 5.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Gare Mâcon Loché TGV Mâcon 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sammyday (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie Raincy 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 10:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château Chantilly 2020-02-18 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie Gouvieux 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 16:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Sts Pierre Paul Ivry Seine 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue Sainte Thérèse de l'Enfant-Jésus Église St Germain Auxerrois Fontenay Bois 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frayère Bords Menthon St Cyr Menthon 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Direction Noisy Grand D75e Gournay Marne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I was going to say that the image is a bit noisy, but ... :D --Peulle 10:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison mitoyenne Tour Moulin Marcigny 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:30, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Doublure 'Trams of Paris Tramway' et 'Trams in Paris'

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Moving a lot of files to 'Trams in Paris' is not necesary as 'Paris Tramway - Trams Line X' are already subcategories of 'Trams of Paris Tramway'. Certainly as most files have a tram material category such as 'Citadis 402 trams in Paris'.Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

To me, 'Trams of Paris Tramway' et 'Trams in Paris' are totally different. Indeed, 'Trams of Paris Tramway' category group trams which take part of Paris Tramway network which is not only located in Paris as it is mainly located in the suburbs (in French we use Île-de-France Tramway instead of Paris to make the difference). Chabe01 (talk) 12:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conteneur Sade Route Teppe Nayet St Cyr Menthon 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau A18 Route Planons St Cyr Menthon 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passerelle Parc Rives Menthon St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Photographer's shadow is a bit unfortunate but ok --MB-one 08:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immeuble 2 avenue Résistance Montreuil Seine St Denis 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
White borders (due to stitching?) --MB-one 14:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
White borders removed Chabe01 22:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie St Cyr Menthon 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frayère Bords Menthon St Cyr Menthon 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque avenue Joinville Nogent Marne 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument morts WWII Cimetière Centre Gagny 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carré militaire Cimetière Bry Marne 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immeuble 20 rue Lafayette Lons Saunier 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue Constantin 1er York 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison habitation façade sud Ferme Domaine Planons St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument morts Versonnex Ain 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mur Briques Impasse Église Fontenay Bois 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mur Briques Impasse Église Fontenay Bois 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stèle Combattants Outre Mer Morts France Carré militaire Cimetière ancien Rosny Bois 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couronne Haut Boîte Lettres Hôtel Ville Gagny 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banc Rue Neuilly Fontenay Bois 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 23:21, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parc Coteaux Avron Neuilly Plaisance 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison 3 rue Neuilly Fontenay Bois 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 22:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison 226 avenue République Fontenay Bois 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 22:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Défense Afficher Rue Commandant Jean Duhail Fontenay Bois 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 12:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Caisse Épargne Dreux 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support good contraste, good brightness, enough sharp subject on the picture Sebring12Hrs 17:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrêt bus André Tessier Fontenay Bois 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 18:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau participation citoyenne Route Mâcon St Cyr Menthon 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rives du Menthon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 01:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rives du Menthon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque avenue Pépinière Fontenay Bois 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 20:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Partie Basse Clocher Église St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église St Cyr Menthon 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Champ Maïs Chemin Cochatières St Cyr Menthon 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église St Cyr vue depuis Croix St Cyr Menthon 2017-08-12 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 01:56, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église St Cyr Menthon vue depuis Croix St Cyr Menthon 2018-04-23 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! École St Cyr Menthon 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Monument morts Nogent Marne 20.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Chabe01. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour, je pense que ce que vous appelez problème récurrent n'est pas conforme à la réalité car je pense que vous avez remarqué que le nombre de sculptures me concernant qui pouvaient poser problème selon vous ont été très fortement réduites. L'erreur est humaine et il est bien de vérifier avant de faire des demandes de suppression. Cordialement, Chabe01 (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

@Chabe01: Il ne s'agit pas d'erreurs ponctuelle mais de fainéantise récurrente à vérifier si l'oeuvre est dans le domaine public ou pas. D'ailleurs aucun de vos téléchargements ne mentionne le nom des auteurs, preuve s'il en est que vous n'avez effectué aucune recherche. De toutes manières, merci de vous exprimer dans la section idoine et non sur votre page de discussion sinon les Administrateurs risquent de ne pas tenir compte de votre argumentaire. Bien à vous, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:47, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tram Ligne 1 Tramway Rue Port St Denis Seine St Denis 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Ville St Denis Seine St Denis 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaques rue Division Leclerc avenue Raspail Gentilly Val Marne 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau entrée Arcueil 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 18:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Michelin Entrée Vincennes 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilique St Denis façade ouest St Denis Seine St Denis 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:52, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château Pont Veyle 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 00:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Interdiction Véhicules 6 Tonnes Plus Route Grapillon Perrex 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borne hectométrique 3 Ligne Mâcon Ambérieu Route Prales Perrex 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --EV Raudtee 14:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque chemin Caillat Vonnas 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --EV Raudtee 14:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panonceau PK 8,980 Route N79 Route Mâcon St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 07:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banc Poubelle Place Marché Vonnas 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 18:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument morts Tuilerie St Cyr Menthon 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Logo Fédération Ukraine Football 2016.svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Logo Fédération Ukraine Football 2016.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fma12 (talk) 10:59, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bouche Incendie 037 Route Deschamps St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 22:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Neuve Perrex 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Sharp. --Bernard Ladenthin 22:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borne 6 Rue Levée Replonges 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 23:51, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borne Hectométrique 4 Gare Mézériat 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 01:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadran analemmatique Monastère Brou Bourg Bresse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 08:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument morts Montmelard 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Ste Garadoz Aubépin Trois Châteaux 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lavoir Sept Chênes St André Désert 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 17:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Route Mâcon St Cyr Menthon 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Randonnée Rue Centre St Cyr Menthon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Champ Maïs Route Gambys St Cyr Menthon 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dindes Bresse Chemin Granges Neuves St Genis Menthon 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 01:52, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Champ Tournesols Route Planons St Cyr Menthon 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église St Julien St Julien Veyle 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Vierge Feillens 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière Replonges 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaches laitières Bécalet St Cyr Menthon 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Route Amitié St Cyr Menthon 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 18:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau entrée Trivy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lavoir St Cyr Menthon 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Statue Delmas place Berland Bordeaux 1.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Statue Delmas place Berland Bordeaux 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

92.184.97.176 17:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Mitoyenne Tour Moulin - Marcigny - 2020-08-15 - 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 12:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie Lélex Ain 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneaux Sommet Crêt Neige Lélex Ain 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sommet Crêt Neige Lélex Ain 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église St Maurice Sauverny Ain - 2020-08-16 - 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 10:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croix Cimetière - Marcigny - 2020-08-15 - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare - Marcigny - 2020-08-15 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Champ Tournesols Route Planons St Cyr Menthon 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rame TER Gare Oyonnax 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Celeda 17:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau B7 Rue Mairie Pougny Ain 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Celeda 15:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tas Bûches Chemin Montépin St Cyr Menthon 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevaux Route Montépin - Bâgé Ville - Bâgé Dommartin - 2020-08-20 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument morts Vonnas 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue Fille Raisins Place Jean Blanc Vonnas 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veyle Rue Verdemont Vonnas 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croix Cimetière Chaneins 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 11:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
SupportGood quality, existing category was specific for this cross, I added categories for grapes and ears in sculpture. --Kritzolina 09:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buste Marie Joseph Bonnat Grièges 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Ste Anne Arthurieux Neuville Ain 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque morts Beauregard Ain 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs some perspective correction. --C messier 16:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Stepro 00:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Panneaux à Paris (et Vichy)

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonsoir, je vois que tu catégorises des panneaux dans les catégories Road signs in Paris - .... Comme j'en ai discuté avec TCY qui avait fait des catégories Road signs in Vichy - ..., le dépeuplement des catégories par code, au profit de sous-catégories par code par commune, gène considérablement ma maintenance. Pour Vichy, j'ai créé et peuplé une hiérarchie parallèle de catégories dans Category:Road signs in Vichy. J'aimerais faire pareil pour Paris. Marc Mongenet (talk) 01:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Bonsoir, je comprends bien. Je tâcherai à éviter les déplacements inopportuns des images dans les catégories de Paris. Chabe01 (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Héloïse fille trois rivières Parc Hôtel Ville Fontenay Bois 2.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 22:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Château Essertaux Bussières Saône Loire 8.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Château Essertaux Bussières Saône Loire 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A01:CB00:3E8:D00:51C8:1DBA:48BD:9FB5 16:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vache Pré Route Platière - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2020-11-09 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vache Pré Route Platière - Saint-Cyr-sur-Menthon (FR01) - 2020-11-09 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Tracé de la ligne T ZEN 1

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour Chabe01

Il y a deux petites erreurs dans le nouveau tracé de la ligne T ZEN 1 que vous avez importé hier :

la position de la station "Carré - Trait-d'Union" n'est pas correcte. Cette station se situe sur le même axe que la station "Carré - Canal", toutes deux sur la voie nommée "Trait d'union" (axe oriental nord-sud du Carré). Vous l'avez positionnée sur la voie nommée "Point de vue" (dans l'axe méridional est-ouest du Carré). En fait, la station "Carré - Trait-d'Union" se situe en face de l'entrée Ouest du centre commercial Westfield Carré Sénart ici ;
la position de la station "Carré des Arts" n'est pas correcte non plus. Elle se situe bien sur la voie nommée "Point de vue" mais dans l'axe méridional sud-nord du Carré, en peu en face de l'entrée de l'ICAM, ici.

Le tracé importé en 2010 montre à peu près la position des deux stations, à ceci prêt que les stations Carré - Trait-d'Union" et "Carré - Canal" sont un peu trop basses sur la voie "Trait d'Union". Il faudrait les remonter un peu plus vers le nord.

A noter aussi que dans votre tracé, la voie "Trait d'Union" semble faire une légère petite déviation au niveau de la position de la station "Carré - Canal" alors que la voie T-ZEN au centre de la voie "Trait d'union" est parfaitement rectiligne. --Poudou99 (talk) 01:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour, merci de tous ces retours, j'ai corrigé la position des stations Carré des Arts et Carré Trait d'Union en les mettant sur le bon axe et j'ai déplacé la station Carré Union pour la mettre un peu plus au nord. Chabe01 (talk) 11:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Panneau Affichage Parking Domaine Planons St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Panneau Affichage Parking Domaine Planons St Cyr Menthon 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Howhontanozaz (talk) 14:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stèle Fusillés Ballufiers - Vonnas (FR01) - 2020-12-02 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie Vonnas 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Catégorie pour les bulletins municipaux

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu as créé la catégorie Symbols of Avon (Seine-et-Marne) en y ajoutant le fichier File:Avon le Journal logo.svg. Étant donné que j'ai importé certains logotypes de bulletins municipaux ces derniers temps, chose qui est nouvelle pour Commons, penses-tu que l'on peut qualifier ça en tant que symbole ? Par ailleurs, penses-tu qu'il faudrait donc créer une catégorie particulière par département ? (je doute en renvanche que j'en ajoute plus dans les temps qui viennent mais j'enverrai probablement des messages aux municipalités directement). Amicalement — Baidax ^💬 00:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour, je l'ai mis dans symbole car quand on regarde les catégories mentionnant des logos, elles sont des catégories filles de symboles (voir Logos). Je sais pas s'il est utile de créer une catégorie particulière, je n'en ai aucune opinion). Chabe01 (talk) 12:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Monuments historiques, tous des bâtiments ?

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Salut Chabe01, je me suis aperçu de cette modification. Penses-tu que l'on devrait garder bien distincts les deu catégories ? Pourtant, il existe bien des monuments historiques qui sont des bâtiments : il faudrait donc les catégoriser dans les deux, sans pour autant catégoriser les monuments historiques dans la catégories des bâtiments vu que tous ne le sont pas. Ainsi, s'agissait-il d'une erreur ou d'un réel choix et que penses-tu donc d'une organisation où l'on fait intevenir quand cela est cohérent ? En attendant ton retour. Bien à toi ! — Baidax ^💬 11:33, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Salut, la modification date d'il y a trois ans et j'ai changé d'avis concernant ces catégories : je pense qu'on doit distinguer Buildings et Monuments historiques car un monument historique n'est pas forcément un bâtiment (un site archéologique, un pont...). Il faudrait que je prenne le temps de faire ces corrections, notamment en Seine-et-Marne. Chabe01 (talk) 12:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station Tramway Ligne 3a Montsouris Paris 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you crop or clon out the leg on the left side? --Tournasol7 00:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Done File is cropped, the leg is is no longer visible. Chabe01 00:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Thank you! --Tournasol7 22:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Vue Tour Montparnasse depuis Parc St Cloud Paris 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Vue Tour Montparnasse depuis Basilique Sacré Cœur Montmartre Paris 2.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Vue Tour Montparnasse depuis Basilique Sacré Cœur Montmartre Paris 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Standardisation of Île-de-France transport icons file names

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, the icons for the transport system in Paris and the Île-de-France have recently changed. The new designs are rolling out on more publicity, such as vianavigo (source) and the Paris Métro map (source).

In preparation for updating the rail interchange icons template on the English Wikipedia Rail Interchange template, I wish to ask if you would be interested in standardising the file names of the new icons. Currently, the file naming convention varies greatly, such as Paris Metro [number].svg for the metro, Île-de-France RER [number].svg for the new RER line icons, and Logo IdFM Tram [number].svg for the new tram icons.

I think that they should all follow a single naming format of Île-de-France [Mode] # icon.svg (e.g. Île-de-France Metro 14 icon.svg), spelling out “Île-de-France” for accessibility reasons, or Paris [Mode] # icon.svg (e.g. Paris RER B icon.svg). Operator variants could follow the format Paris [Mode] # icon, [Operator] version.svg (e.g. Paris Train J icon, RATP version.svg). Mode icons could follow the format Paris [Mode] icon.svg (e.g. Paris Metro icon.svg)

Best, --Minoa (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Tramway Lyon 2 Tracé.svg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello ! Si ce n'est pas déjà fait, pourrais-tu anticiper la mise à jour provisoire du prolongement du T2 sur ce plan jusqu'à l'hôtel de région ? Bonne journée ! Nonopoly (talk) 12:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rame Métro Pont ferroviaire Ligne 8 Métro Paris Charenton Pont 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition! --Etaped 16:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panneau Michelin Rivière Marne Pont Joinville - Joinville-le-Pont (FR94) - 2021-02-03 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mairie Boissy St Léger 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and delightful symmetry. --Yitzilitt 05:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)