Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Baidax!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Categories by city edit

Hello, Baidax. Thanks for the new categories you have created. I noticed that you used the template {{Catcat}} on some of them, such as the following:

Please not that the categories whose names start with "Signs in" should be tagged with {{metacat|city}} instead of the {{Catcat}} template. The others are fine with the template you used. I have changed the ones listed here. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Auntof6: Thank you for pointing that out and letting me know! I'm taking this practice into account and will apply it next time. However, I didn't understand the difference between the two templates apart from some details in the text, if it's possible to explain. Moreover, given that the signs by department are also sorted by type, I think it would be consistent to group those by city when possible; I will thus create the remaining categories. Baidax (talk) 11:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Logo vectorisation request edit

Hi. I saw you work with svg so requesting you. de:Datei:East Bengal Club.svg in this there is a spelling mistake. Its written KolkaTTa instead of KOLKATA. It will be single T. I want too upload it on enwiki and replace the existing png logo at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Bengal_F.C. ArnabSaha (talk) 18:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

@ArnabSaha: Hi! Sorry for this late response, I should have let you know. Thank you for your request. Unfortunately, after trying, I didn't manage to fix it as it should be in the original logo. Therefore, I asked on the Discord server of the French community and another person made the change that day. Next time, I think you can post a message in the Graphic Lab, you'd find there professionals in this field. Best regards, Baidax (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I saw, it got updated. Thanks. And ok then, I will ask there from next time :) ArnabSaha (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

re: (biscuits edit

[1] OK. I'm sorry for that. SpiderMum (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@SpiderMum: Never mind, thanks for putting it back as it was. At least it helped create links between related categories. Baidax (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi Baidax, the SVG 2020 Logo is an Inkscape-reproduction of the 2016 Logo, by referenced to the PNG 2020 Version Logo in Commons. It will be glad if you can obtain an official logo from the campaign team! -- Nv7801 (talk) 13:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey edit

 
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Baidax,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horloge de l'hôtel de ville de Compiègne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Not the sharpest but OK considering the resolution --Podzemnik 00:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cour intérieure lycée François-Ier été (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful, and good enough quality for a night photo. -- Ikan Kekek 00:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Canberra logo.svg edit

 
File:Canberra logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Bidgee (talk) 03:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Bidgee: , you have asked for a speedy deletion request for an ambiguous case in view of its simplicity and should have been properly discussed on a talk page. In addition, you did not consider any possibility to at least add this file on Wikipedia pages on the principle of fair use, which I find very regrettable since it is a simple action. Do you have a copy; if so, could you please add it on those pages? — Baidax 💬 18:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
It isn't "ambiguous", the Aboriginal flag is as simple as you can get in simplicity but it is copyrighted in Australia. As what COM:L states, it must be freely licensed from the source country and COM:TOO Australia states most logos are not ok to be hosted on Commons. Not my task to upload as fair-use on Wikipedia. Bidgee (talk) 01:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mémorial de l'Escadrille La Fayette - vue globale et de face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Super, merci !   --Asticoco‎ (talk) 10:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Genshin Impact logo.svg edit

 
File:Genshin Impact logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aasim 21:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Manufacture de tapisserie Castel edit

Bonjour Baidax. La double présence des coordonnées existe depuis que Wikidata a voulu prendre le pas sur les différentes wikipédias et commons. Je mets des coordonnées le pus précises possibles depuis 2008 sur commons, bien avant que Wikidata existe. Et je continue encore puisque souvent je crée des catégories sur commons que Wikidata ne connait pas encore : cimetières, monuments aux morts, etc.

Je sais bien que j'aurais pu rectifier Wikidata directement, ce que je fais parfois, mais tu aurais alors continué ton ménage sans penser à vérifier si les coordonnées de commons étaient similaires avec celles de Wikidata. J'espère qu'ainsi tu prendras soin de le vérifier la prochaine fois. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 18:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Samois-sur-Seine - blason hôtel de ville.jpg edit

 
File:Samois-sur-Seine - blason hôtel de ville.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 17:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour @Glorious 93: , ce genre de décision doit préférentiellement passer par une procédure de suppression normale et discutée avec un avis communautaire. Je vous invite, s'il vous plaît, à changer le type de procédure. Cdlt — Baidax 💬 17:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
P.S. vous pouviez de plus, en bonne manière et voyant que je suis un contributeur actif, me laisser un message préalablement pour résoudre cette situation. Ce fichier a été importé il y a maintenant un bout de temps et je ne connais plus l'auteur ; il me semblait avoir vu le blason figurer sur d'anciennes photos, faisant de cette production une œuvre dans le domaine public. Je me charge de contacter l'administration municipale à ce sujet et je vous prie de retarder la suppression éventuelle de ce fichier, qui jusqu'à présent n'a posé de problème. Cdlt — 17:11, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Postcards edit

Hello Baidax, thanks for uploading postcards. Maybe you are interessted in COM:WPPC. Best regards --sk (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Путинские указы edit

От того, что русскоязычные пользователи Викисклада из принципа или не зная английского языка загружают файлы указов с русскоязычными названиями, совершенно не следует что все должны следовать этой практике. Тут не русский Викисклад, а интернациональный, следовательно предпочтителен английский. Никакого «стандарта для управления всеми указами» тут нет. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Sydney Opera House logo.svg edit

 
File:Sydney Opera House logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tbhotch 01:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Lauwin-Planque - Teheiura Teahui présent au centre de distribution d'Amazon LIL1 lors d'un have fun sur le thème de Koh-Lanta le 15 novembre 2021.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Sculpture de vache.jpg edit

 
File:Sculpture de vache.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Forêt de Fontainebleau - Arbonne-la-Forêt - Drone.webm edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Forêt de Fontainebleau - Arbonne-la-Forêt - Drone.webm, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Gpkp (talk) 10:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Gpkp, thank you for your notification. I have just corrected the source: the license on the video has changed in the meantime, but fortunately there is an archive which I have also specified on the file page. — Baidax 💬 10:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply